-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
From:                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent:              Wed, 9 Jun 1999 16:04:28 EDT
Subject:                VOICE OF THE GRUNT Newsletter, 1999-06-09-B
To:                     undisclosed-recipients:;

VOICE OF THE GRUNT Newsletter, 1999-06-09-B
=================================================
ARTICLE 6
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A QUESTION OF RESPECT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SUMMARY: Dr. Nebergall touches upon one of the intangibles of
military
service -- citizenship. Citizenship confers responsibilities and
obligations. To those who choose to raise their right arm and swear
an
oath of service, perhaps you need to expect more from your civilian
leadership. In Robert Heinlein's books, only those who serve their
country
are allowed to vote.
********************************************************* By Peter J.
Nebergall, PhD

 Not long ago, Madeline Albright, when confronted with the weakened,
over-committed, under-equipped condition of our ground forces, facing yet
another "peacekeeping" commitment, responded: "They'll do what they're
told; they're professionals."

 I was horrified, by the inhumanity of her statement, by its callous
indifference to the citizens who serve, and by its total disregard of
history. Perhaps other countries have had such "professionals" as Ms.
Albright conjures, a "military class" -- but we are not Prussians, no
matter how much she and her master may wish we were.

 You don't need me to talk to you of inhumanity, or of indifference
-- you know what they are. I know too -- so let's look at the "disregard
of history."

 The "Founding Fathers," George Washington and his fellows, had an
almost universal distrust of "standing armies," of military professionals
dedicated to furthering the sovereign's whimsy. They saw the "citizen
soldier" as the backbone of their freedom - - the citizen who is a soldier
-- the soldier who is a (fully integrated) citizen -- not the servant of
the state but a full member.

 Admittedly, we are beyond the days of the old militias -- fighting
is too complex to just grab the musket -- but we are NOT beyond the days
where the Founding Fathers' view has merit. I think we should reflect.

 Why do you serve? Is it the joy of obedience? Is it delight in
furthering the ambitions of your leaders? I think not. I think you serve
out of a sense of citizenship, of sharing the responsibility for living
where you live and being what you are. You certainly did not take the oath
for the power it confers or the riches it brings -- and your choice, like
your profession, is worthy of more respect than our current crop of
leaders see fit to offer.

 A leader who respects his (or her!) armed services is less likely to
commit them like chessmen to a meaningless, but lethal, gesture where only
political brownie points will be gained, and is more willing to weigh the
balance, and then commit troops wholeheartedly where it is right and
proper. A respectful leader feels the loss of life (ours and theirs both)
that is inherent -- for war is not a computer game. A respectful leader
has a sense of time and place, and thus does a better job when that time
and place arrive.

It is indeed a question of respect.
================================================
ARTICLE 7
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WHY I'M LEAVING ACTIVE DUTY
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SUMMARY: An Air Force officer let us know why he's getting out - The
Leadership and politics. It just isn't fun anymore; there's no enjoyment.
************************************************ By USAF Officer

 After a career as a Navigator, I'm leaving active duty. I can make a list
of 20 reasons to stay and 200 reasons to go. Pilots, finance officers,
Army aviators, sailors and infantrymen can all make similar lists. For me,
though--and I suspect for many others--the driving force behind my
decision is this: I hate working for idiots.

 I don't mean the civilian leadership because they come and go at the whim
of an undereducated American public. I refer instead to the senior
military "leaders" (I use that word in it's loosest sense). Thirty years
from now when historians write about the great leaders of today, they will
not profile anyone in the military or politics. They will focus on
computer companies, large multinational corporations, and athletes.

 Yet, if you review a list of great leaders from the 40s, 50s, early
60s, 80s, and early 90s you will see that it full of military men and
politicians--and most of the great politicians were former military men.
Note that I left out the mid-late 60s and the 70s. The same climate
existed then as now, and you've got the same results...abysmal military
retention, poor morale, disgust with the political establishment, decaying
morals, and a host of other problems that are ripping the heart and soul
out of the US military. Then, as now, "ticket-punching" outweighed mission
accomplishment; capitulation was preferred to courage; and the spouting
the "party line," not caring for your troops as individuals, got you
promoted.

 Doubting the leadership at IBM or Boeing won't get anybody killed.
Doubting the effectiveness of the men appointed over you in the military
might. Therefore, I have no option but to look elsewhere for employment.
================================================= ARTICLE 8
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LETTER TO MADAME JUSTICE LOUISE
ARBOUR ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

May 29, 1999
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
P.O. Box 13888
Churchillplain1
2501 EW, The Hague
Netherlands


Dear Madame Prosecutor:

I have been a lawyer in Pittsburgh, PA USA for 25 years and I am a Vietnam
era veteran of the US Army, having served from 1963 to 1966. I am writing
to request that you consider investigating the conduct of NATO leaders in
the bombings of Yugoslavia and, if the investigation shows a prima facia
case, to indict.

I believe the law is quite clear and that the conduct of NATO leaders
speaks for itself. Professor Michael Mandel and his colleagues from
Canada's Osgood Hall Law School outline well the facts and the law in the
charge sent to you and I incorporate their presentation in this letter by
this reference.

I joined the army after high school because I was very patriotic and
wanted to do the right thing. While serving in the infantry in Alaska in
1965 my outfit was placed on orders to go to Vietnam. I was 21 years old
and a Sergeant in a machine gun squad. We were told that there were two
countries, North Vietnam and South Vietnam. The South was a good country
and the North was a bad one. The South was democratic and peace loving.
The North was Communist and totalitarian. It was explained to us that the
North was attempting to force the South to accept Communism and that the
US was helping the small, weak democratic South retain its freedom.
Shortly before shipping out I was informed that I would not be going
because I had less than 90 days left in my enlistment. Reenlistment
efforts of my commanding officer were unsuccessful.

After I returned home I started to receive letters from my buddies who
were then in Vietnam. I received letter after letter depicting the
personal horrors of my friends. I was told that Bob Steele, 19 years old,
clenched a hand grenade to his stomach and bent over a bunker. None of his
nearby buddies were harmed but he was blown in half. Mac, another 19 year
old, was on point (lead man in a column) when a Viet Cong ambush was
sprung early. Only the few men (boys, actually) in the lead were hit by
the ambush. Mac was captured alive. In an attempt to lure others into the
ambush the "enemy" tortured Mac. Mac was repeatedly stabbed with his own
bayonet to make him scream and holler in pain and fear. When Mac's
mutilated body was recover, nobody could recognize him. Many more horrors
were related to me in letters. I called my dead buddies' parents and their
grief was mine and still is.

After awhile I got a letter saying, "Everybody over here hates us." I was
astonished. Why would a people whom we were unselfishly sacrificing our
own youth and treasure to save hate us? I went to the library and started
to read. I learned that after the French-Indochinese War there were to be
internationally supervised Geneva Accord elections in Vietnam. The CIA
informed the US president, Eisenhower, that if the elections were held
that 80 some percent of the South Vietnamese would vote for the Communist
North leader, Ho Chi Minh. The US was not in Vietnam to prevent the forced
imposition of a form of government but instead to impose one. My buddies
and I were duped by our own elected leaders in whom we had so much trust.
If the sacrifices of my buddies and all the millions of others who have
served in the militaries of the world's different nations in this century
(including my grandfather, parents, uncles and cousins) are not to be in
vain it is up to us to work for the type of world they were led to believe
they were fighting for. If we fail, they will have indeed died in vain.

I am now 54 years old. I see little progress towards the type of world so
many died to try to bring about. You are in a unique position, a
prestigious position of trust, where you can move us to the type of world
so many crave. Please investigate the actions of the NATO leaders and
issue comprehensive and credible findings. If the evidence warrants,
please indict. It is time for an international system of criminal justice
where not only the vanquished are held accountable for their illegal
actions but the powerful and victorious, too.

Peace loving peoples the world over are hopeful (yes, even during this
tragic war) that the International Criminal Tribunal will act credibly and
do the right thing. Help make the sacrifices of so many dead meaningful.


Very truly yours,


S.K.
Pittsburgh, PA
===========================================
ARTICLE 9
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*******Medal Of Honor*******
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DONLON, ROGER HUGH C.

Rank and organization: Captain, U.S. Army.
Place and date: Near Nam Dong, Republic of Vietnam, 6 July 1964.

Entered service at: Fort Chaffee, Ark.
Born: 30 January 1934, Saugerties, N.Y.

G.O. No.: 41, 17 December 1964.

Citation: For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his
life above and beyond the call of duty while defending a U.S. military
installation against a fierce attack by hostile forces. Capt. Donlon was
serving as the commanding officer of the U.S. Army Special Forces
Detachment A-726 at Camp Nam Dong when a reinforced Viet Cong battalion
suddenly launched a full-scale, predawn attack on the camp. During the
violent battle that ensued, lasting 5 hours and resulting in heavy
casualties on both sides, Capt. Donlon directed the defense operations in
the midst of an enemy barrage of mortar shells, falling grenades, and
extremely heavy gunfire. Upon the initial onslaught, he swiftly marshaled
his forces and ordered the removal of the needed ammunition from a blazing
building. He then dashed through a hail of small arms and exploding hand
grenades to abort a breach of the main gate. En route to this position he
detected an enemy demolition team of 3 in the proximity of the main gate
and quickly annihilated them. Although exposed to the intense grenade
attack, he then succeeded in reaching a 60mm mortar position despite
sustaining a severe stomach wound as he was within 5 yards of the gun pit.

When he discovered that most of the men in this gunpit were also wounded,
he completely disregarded his own injury, directed their withdrawal to a
location 30 meters away, and again risked his life by remaining behind and
covering the movement with the utmost effectiveness. Noticing that his
team sergeant was unable to evacuate the gun pit he crawled toward him
and, while dragging the fallen soldier out of the gunpit, an enemy mortar
exploded and inflicted a wound in Capt. Donlon's left shoulder. Although
suffering from multiple wounds, he carried the abandoned 60mm mortar
weapon to a new location 30 meters away where he found 3 wounded
defenders. After administering first aid and encouragement to these men,
he left the weapon with them, headed toward another position, and
retrieved a 57mm recoilless rifle. Then with great courage and coolness
under fire, he returned to the abandoned gun pit, evacuated ammunition for
the 2 weapons, and while crawling and dragging the urgently needed
ammunition, received a third wound on his leg by an enemy hand grenade.
Despite his critical physical condition, he again crawled 175 meters to an
81mm mortar position and directed firing operations which protected the
seriously threatened east sector of the camp. He then moved to an eastern
60mm mortar position and upon determining that the vicious enemy assault
had weakened, crawled back to the gun pit with the 60mm mortar, set it up
for defensive operations, and turned it over to 2 defenders with minor
wounds.

Without hesitation, he left this sheltered position, and moved from
position to position around the beleaguered perimeter while hurling hand
grenades at the enemy and inspiring his men to superhuman effort. As he
bravely continued to move around the perimeter, a mortar shell exploded,
wounding him in the face and body. As the long awaited daylight brought
defeat to the enemy forces and their retreat back to the jungle leaving
behind 54 of their dead, many weapons, and grenades, Capt. Donlon
immediately reorganized his defenses and administered first aid to the
wounded. His dynamic leadership, fortitude, and valiant efforts inspired
not only the American personnel but the friendly Vietnamese defenders as
well and resulted in the successful defense of the camp. Capt. Donlon's
extraordinary heroism, at the risk of his life above and beyond the call
of duty are in the highest traditions of the U.S. Army and reflect great
credit upon himself and the Armed Forces of his country.
===================================================== ARTICLE 10
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NATO'S LENGTHENING LIST OF BLUNDERS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BRUSSELS, June 1 (AFP) - NATO
confirmed Tuesday that one of its bombs had landed in a residential
neighborhood in the Serbian town of Novi Pazar, adding to the growing list
of alliance air strikes which have led to civilian casualties since the
air campaign began 10 weeks ago.

 Serb officials put the death toll from the following incidents, most of
which but not all NATO acknowledges as errors, at more than 460.

 Overall, they say, some 2,000 civilians have been killed since the
start of the air campaign on March 24.

 NATO has repeatedly denied that it deliberately attacks nonmilitary
buildings and insists that all possible precautions are taken to avoid
civilian casualties.

 - April 5: A 250-kilo (550-pound) NATO bomb aimed at Yugoslav army
barracks in Aleksinac in southern Serbia misses its target and lands in a
residential area. Serbs put death toll at 17.

 - April 9: NATO hits homes near a telephone exchange in the Kosovo
capital, Pristina. NATO said civilian casualties were possible but neither
side provided a death toll.

 - April 12: A NATO pilot fires two missiles into a train crossing a
bridge at Grdelicka Klisura in southern Serbia, killing 55 people,
according to Belgrade. NATO insists the bridge, a key supply line for
Yugoslav forces in Kosovo, was the target and that the pilot saw the train
too late.

 - April 14: NATO bombs refugee convoys in the Djakovica region of
southeast Kosovo, leaving 75 dead, according to Belgrade. NATO, without
confirming the civilian toll, said it was targeting military vehicles but
admitted hitting two convoys.

 - April 28: NATO, aiming for an army barracks in the Serb village of
Surdulica (250 kms/150 miles south of Belgrade), bombs a residential area,
leaving at least 20 civilians dead.

 - May 1: NATO bombs a bridge at Luzane near Pristina, killing 47
people aboard a bus that was traveling along it. NATO, without confirming
the figure, admitted the following day having targeted the bridge without
the intention of causing civilian casualties.

 - May 7: A NATO air raid hits central Nis in southeast Serbia,
leaving at least 15 dead and 70 injured. NATO said its planes were aiming
for a landing strip and a radio transmitter but that a cluster bomb had
missed its mark.

 - May 8: NATO mistakenly attacks the Chinese embassy in Belgrade,
killing three journalists. The United States and NATO said the intended
target was a Yugoslav building with military use, but US maps used in the
planning of the operation were old and marked the embassy at a previous
address.

 - May 13: NATO bombs the village of Korisa, leaving 87 civilians
dead according to the Serbs. The allies claim that the civilians were
being used as "human shields" and that Korisa was a legitimate military
target.

 - May 20: A Belgrade hospital is hit by a missile at around 1:00
a.m., killing three patients. NATO attributes the accident to a missile
that went astray during an attack on a nearby military barracks.

 - May 21: NATO bombs Istok prison in northwest Kosovo. Alliance
officials insist the prison was being used as an assembly point for Serb
forces in the province. Serbs say that at least 100 inmates and a prison
officer were killed.

 - May 22: NATO admits bombing by mistake positions of the Kosovo
Liberation Army at Kosare, near the border with Albania. Sources close to
the KLA say seven guerillas were killed and 15 injured.

 - May 30: NATO bombs a highway bridge at Varvarin in a daytime raid
in central Serbia. The Serbs claim 11 people died while attempting to
cross the bridge in their cars. NATO has not confirmed whether there were
cars on the bridge and insists the bridge was a legitimate military
target.

 - May 31: Missiles strike a sanatorium at Surdulica, southern
Serbia, killing at least 20 people, according to the Serb authorities.
NATO says it successfully attacked a military barracks in the town but
refuses to confirm, or categorically deny, hitting the hospital.

 - May 31: A NATO bomb aimed at a military compound strikes a
four-story apartment block in the town of Novi Pazar. NATO confirms one of
its bombs went astray and landed in a residential area. Serb authorities
report 23 dead. ===================================================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ VOICE OF THE GRUNT Volunteers:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ David H. Hackworth, Taker of Names and
Spiritual Leader Robert L. McMahon, Editor and Chief bottle-washer Barry
"Woody" Groton, Assistant Editor and Medicine Man Ed "Edgar" Schneider,
Copy Editor, Man of Letters and gentleman Larry Tahler, WebMaster Guru and
Crack-shot Judy Bowyer Martin, Administration and Brains of the Outfit
Kyle Elliott, Book List Editor and Most Over-worked
=================================================== EDITOR'S NOTE: As a
rule of thumb, please try to keep article for possible publication to 700
words or less. We do make exceptions and will not turn away an 800 to 900
word piece, but please make every editing effort not to exceed these
guidelines.

If you believe you have a story that is longer than 700 words we will
consider running it in parts. Keep the piece focused on the story you want
to express, not impress upon the reader.

Thanks to everyone for keeping the communication lines open and the ideas
flowing.

Semper Fi,
Bob McMahon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Editor
=============================================
ARCHIVED DEFENDING AMERICA COLUMNS:
You can now find copies of Hack's previous columns at:
http://www.hackworth.com. These are found in the Defending America
Section, under Archived Copies. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GLOSSARY OF MILITARY ACRONYMS: We've had numerous requests from troops in
different branches of the military to establish this link so that we will
all know how "all you others" talk that talk. Please see below:
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/acronym_index.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CONGRESSIONAL E-MAIL ADDRESSES

Congressional e-mail addresses can be found by going to
(www.hackworth.com) and accessing Congressional e-mails at the bottom of
the first page. ********************ORDERING
BOOKS*************************

 We still have Trade copies of About Face. These are exactly the same as
the hardback, except they have a soft cover. Cost for an autographed copy:
$26.00 (including handling and postage).

 If you are interested in ordering Hack's books (About Face*,
Hazardous Duty**, or The Vietnam Primer), check out the instructions at
our web page: http://www.hackworth.com.

 It takes about 3 weeks to process the book orders. Your patience is
appreciated. Please mark on outside if envelope "Book Order" and make
check out to:

 Twin Eagles Ink
 PO Box 5210
 Greenwich, CT  06831

*About Face available in trade copy.
**Hazardous Duty available in hardback.
====================================================

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to