-Caveat Lector-
An opinion only arises from resarch and obesravtion:
Any written paper work you present to the Legislative Tribunal will be
construed in the most favorable light of the “court.”
This will be construed as a motion, and a traverse. This will raise the
General Appearance.
This Legislative Tribunal is the creation not of the People, but of the General
Assembly of Nevada to adjudicate issues of commerce.
If you in any way present a statement written or oral within this tribunal, you
will have traversed.
The best form of discovery is to exhaust the administrative remedy with
statutory discovery using a public records act request to the Administrative
agency that alleges jurisdiction over the private acts of Joshua.
This premise of the non appearance is simple. It is not a tool to challenge or
defeat the Statutorily created rules for movement. It is a tool that presents
the legislative tribunal the simple point that we do not UNDERSTAND. Any words
beyond that, and one will loose. No UNDERSTANDING, no jurisdiction.
To defeat the legislative tribunal, you will need to initiate a statutory
discovery. The properly constructed public records act request will request “
the documents made for the transaction of public business.” which the Agency
will choose to ignore. That will allow you to enter the County where in the
State of Nevada does business and petition the appropriate Legislative Tribunal
under a writ, or motion of Mandamus praying upon the Statue for relief.
As the alleged “defendant” one should stand on the simple point of not
UNDERSTANDING, and ask nothing but questions. To put anything in writing or
within an oral statement will be construed as an offering to the “alter” of
justice, and the black robed administer will accept that offering and impose
the libel which attached to the rem. This libel will be charged to the
Resident Agent, which will be the alleged “defendant.”
.
The cost of liberty is eternal vigilance
"In a age of universal deceit, telling
the truth is a revolutionary act."
George Orwell
----------
> From: Christopher Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [teaparty] 14th again
> Date: Saturday, May 15, 1999 4:49 AM
>
> From: Christopher Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sorry about all the emails but my mind is racing a bit. I am working on
> Joshua's case and preparing to go to court. I am going to first use a
> variation of the notice of non appearance but knowing Nevada courts I
> have to be prepared to lose. I believe it is a great argument but I have
> been screwed four times by State courts so my lack of trust is
> justified.
>
> If Josh claims a due process violation not because he is a US citizen
> but because the state is bound by the 14th combined with a clearly
> worded statement that he is a US national and a white non 14th Nevada
> Citizen then the court would have to either rule that his claim was void
> because he was not a US citizen which would be worth its weight in gold
> or say that the he could not use the 14th because he is not a 14th
> citizen which accomplishes the same thing or rule it is applicable even
> to non 14th citizens which is useful or try to prove he isn't a 14th
> citizen.
>
> I would like any of those to occur. What is the downside to this?
>
> I will already have made an objection to the jurisdiction of the court
> so I will not be admitting their jurisdiction and will have on the
> record that Joshua is proceeding only under threat of jail.
>
> Christopher
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Looking for a new hobby? Want to make a new friend?
> http://www.onelist.com
> Come join one of the 145,000 email communities at ONElist!
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> NOTICE: Keep to the issues. Focus on solutions. The moderators of this list
have little time or patience for jokes, tirades, flaming, rambling philosophy,
religious arguments, off-topic discussions or back-slapping. You may, without
warning, be limited to READ ONLY, not being able to post to the list. Stick to
the point! CC
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
