-Caveat Lector-

 <A
HREF="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_dougherty/19990811_xnjdo_a_progun_l
.shtml">A pro-gun legal offensive  </A>
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_dougherty/19990811_xnjdo_a_progun_l.shtml

A pro-gun legal offensive
Lawsuit would challenge
1934 National Firearms Act

------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Jon E. Dougherty
© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com

A group opposed to the provisions of the 1934 National Firearms Act is
planning a lawsuit to force the federal government to amend or repeal the
65-year-old law.

According to the 1934 Group, a provision of federal firearms law known as the
CLEO, or Certified Law Enforcement Officer sign-off provision is being
challenged as an illegal unfunded federal mandate and tax requirement. The
provision requires local law enforcement officials to approve the purchase of
fully automatic weapons and, once approved, requires the purchaser to pay a
$200 tax on each weapon purchased.

That requirement, the group claims, is subject to bias against certain
dealers who sell the weapons as well as the individuals who want to buy them.
And, a spokesman for the group told WorldNetDaily, it has lent itself to
abuse for political reasons.

"We're willing to do what most other organizations are unwilling to -- help
manufacturers, dealers and consumers of NFA items exclusively," said Kel
Whelan, director of the 1934 Group. "Ultimately, we'd love to see the NFA '34
pulled down as the unconstitutional taxation sham it is."

Whelan told WorldNetDaily the proposed suit "will not center exclusively on
the Second Amendment because if it did, we don't think we'd get very far."
Instead, "there are a number of provisions and constitutional amendments,
including the Second Amendment, in question here. We just think it's time
this law went away."

"The nice part about this suit is it will have many plaintiffs, each with
their own argument," he said. "Unreasonable search and seizure, Fifth
Amendment issues, restraint of trade from a retailer's perspective, restraint
of trade from the buyer's, tax privacy issues, 10th Amendment, 14th
Amendment, Second Amendment and so on. And the Treasury Department has to win
all the arguments, while we only have to win one to succeed."

Whelan said the suit should not be misconstrued as an attempt to legalize any
weapons that are not currently legal.

"It is about helping legal manufacturers, dealers and end-users process
paperwork used in paying tax on firearms that have always been legal to
purchase," he explained. "If someone doesn't agree that these collectible and
rare firearms should be legal, then that is an entirely separate issue that
they are welcome to attempt legislation concerning, but no one should agree
to endorse harassment through abuse of law and cronyism resulting in chilling
civil rights."

One of the 1934 Group's attorneys is Stephen Halbrook, "the attorney that
argued the 'Brady' (U.S. v. Printz) case and subsequently got that piece of
poor law declared void." Another attorney, Jim Jeffries, is joining Halbrook.

"I would hope that every CL2 manufacturer and CL3 dealer, regardless of
whether their current CLEOs are friendly for now, will understand that this
suit translates into more sales," Whelan said. "Every purchaser should
understand that their purchases and the ability to leave them to an heir
should not involve having their privacy infringed upon by often-prejudiced
local law enforcement."

Whelan said the CLEO requirements have been politically motivated or
otherwise biased for years. He cited abuses documented by the group in
Alaska, Houston, and Miami, and said even the BATF has advised dealers "not
to sign off on their own requirement on their own forms."

"Often dealers find it in their interest to bribe or search out friendly
chiefs and sheriffs in order to provide signoffs for their clients," Whelan
wrote in a recent press release. "Sometimes it works out the opposite way. In
some areas, if you don't buy the item from a store that made a significant
contribution to the sheriff's re-election fund, you don't get a signoff."

"Is it not obvious that this federal requirement lends itself to local
corruption? Is it not obvious that a federal form should not require a local
signoff?" he said.

Whelan added that many pro-gun supporters have been waiting for an
organization to "go on the offensive" for years rather than simply "fight
back."

"That time is now," he said. "That group is us. It's time."

------------------------------------------------------------------------



Jon E. Dougherty is a senior writer and columnist for WorldNetDaily, as well
as a morning co-host of Daybreak America.

**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and
educational purposes only.[Ref.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to