-Caveat Lector-

Pro-Israel Group Criticizes White House Policy on Iran
At Issue Is New Stance on Tehran's Nuclear Program

By Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 25, 2005; Page A09


After years of unwavering support for the Bush administration, the powerful 
pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC has begun to sharply criticize the White 
House over its handling of Iran's nuclear program.

In lengthy news releases and talking points circulated to supporters on 
Capitol Hill, AIPAC describes the Bush administration's recent policy 
decisions on Iran as "dangerous," "disturbing" and "inappropriate." One 
background paper suggests that White House policies are actually helping 
Iran -- a sworn enemy of the Jewish state -- to acquire nuclear weapons.

     Who's Blogging?
      Read what bloggers are saying about this article.

        a.. HIT ME AGAIN
        b.. the cynic librarian
        c.. Blog Curry - Political News


       Full List of Blogs (9 links) »


      Most Blogged About Articles
       On washingtonpost.com | On the web


The tough words from one of Washington's most well-connected and influential 
lobbies come at a difficult time for President Bush, who has been struggling 
with low poll numbers and growing public discontent over the war in Iraq.

Bush raised AIPAC's concerns in a recent telephone conversation with British 
Prime Minister Tony Blair when the two discussed Iran, U.S. officials said.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee has tussled with past 
administrations -- Democratic and Republican -- but not with Bush, who has 
staked his presidency on a vow to bring democracy to a region dominated by 
Israel's enemies -- chiefly Iran, Iraq and Syria.

At issue for AIPAC is Bush's decision last month to hold off on pushing to 
report Iran's nuclear case to the U.N. Security Council. The president and 
Israel have favored reporting it for the past two years. But with little 
support from other key U.S. allies, Bush reversed course and endorsed a 
Russian offer that would allow Iran to conduct some, but not all, of the 
nuclear work it says it needs for an indigenous nuclear energy program.

Iran has not been receptive to the Russian offer. Iranian diplomats met with 
their European counterparts in Vienna on Wednesday to discuss the offer. 
Diplomats said there were no breakthroughs, but the parties agreed to meet 
again in January.

If Iran accepts the terms, it would be allowed to produce unlimited 
quantities of converted uranium. That material would be shipped to Russia 
for enrichment and then returned to Iran to fuel a nuclear power reactor.

In a statement to members of Congress, AIPAC said that it "is concerned that 
the decision not to go to the Security Council, combined with the U.S. 
decision to support the 'Russian proposal,' indicates a disturbing shift in 
the Administration's policy on Iran and poses a danger to the U.S. and our 
allies."

National security adviser Stephen J. Hadley said he hopes the plan "may 
provide a way out" of a two-year crisis over a nuclear program that Iran 
says is peaceful but was secretly built over 18 years.

Critics of the Russian plan, including some inside the administration, argue 
that it would allow Iran to master a critical component that could be 
diverted for atomic weapons work. Converted uranium, if enriched to 
bomb-grade, can be used for the core of a nuclear device.

U.N. nuclear inspectors are on the third year of an investigation of Iran's 
nuclear program. They have not found proof of a weapons program, but 
mounting evidence suggests that the Iranians have spent the past two decades 
acquiring the knowledge and technology that could be used to build an atomic 
bomb.

"This decision will facilitate Iran's quest for nuclear weapons and 
undermines international efforts to stop Iran from achieving such a 
capability," AIPAC told supporters and policymakers in a paper circulated 
after Thanksgiving. The position paper urged the Bush administration to work 
quickly toward reporting Iran's case to the Security Council, where it could 
face sanctions or an oil embargo.

AIPAC, which describes itself as nonpartisan, has criticized nearly every 
administration's Middle East policies, often speaking out when Israeli 
government officials express private frustration with U.S. policies.

But the news releases mark the first major criticism of the Bush White House 
and come as the administration is focused on problems in Iraq and has no 
clear path on Iran.

At the same time, Iran's new president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has become 
increasingly hostile toward Israel. In October, two months after he took 
office, Ahmadinejad said that Israel should be "wiped off the map." Earlier 
this month, he told Iranians in a nationally televised speech that the 
murder of 6 million Jews at the hands of the Nazis during World War II is "a 
myth."

"AIPAC is taking the public statements seriously. They're alarmed by a 
nuclear capability, and the administration appears to be adopting an 
approach that isn't changing Iranian behavior," said Dennis Ross, a U.S. 
envoy to the Middle East during the Clinton administration.

Ross said the criticisms, though serious, are unlikely to lead to an all-out 
rift between AIPAC and the administration. "At the end of the day, every 
administration does what it needs to do, but obviously they will have to pay 
attention to this," he said.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to