-Caveat Lector-

Published on Sunday, March 2, 2003 by The Free Press (Columbus, Ohio)

Bush and America's Willing Executioners Would Be Guilty at Nuremburg
by Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

If he launches an attack on Iraq without the approval of the United
Nations Security Council, George W. Bush will be guilty of crimes on par
with those committed by the infamous Nazi leaders who were tried at
Nuremburg in 1948, after World War II.

The law is clear. At Nuremburg, American, British, French and Soviet
jurists used international conventions, legal precedent and a global
moral consensus to establish a code of conduct deemed the standard for
all nations.

Key was the "crimes against humanity" prohibition stemming from the
conscious slaughter of six million Jews, leftists, gypsies and others by
the Nazi fanatics.

But also crucial was the ban on unprovoked attack by one nation against
another. The explosive fuse that set off World War II was the September
1,1939 Nazi attack on Poland, which was unprovoked by any stretch of the
military imagination. By all accounts it was an act of aggression and
conquest, which led ultimately to as many as 50 million deaths over the
next six years.

Article VI of the Nuremburg Charter defines "Crimes Against Peace" as
"planning, preparation, initiation or waging of war of aggression, or a
war in violation of international treaties . . . or participation in a
common plan or conspiracy . . . to wage an aggressive war.

A week before the unprovoked Nazi assault on Poland, Hitler promised his
generals he would provide "a propagandistic reason for starting the
war.� He then justified a "preemptive" strike based on lies about a
non-existent Polish Army attack against Germany.

The Nazi attack date had been set for more than a year. "The victor will
not be asked afterwards whether he told the truth or not," Hitler told
his generals. "In starting and waging a war it is not right that
matters, but victory."

After Hitler's deceptions were revealed at Nuremburg, the surviving
Nazis based their defense on the claim of "preventative war," claiming a
need to protect Germany from a pending Polish attack. They were the
last, until Bush, to use that rationale.

It didn't work. For this attack, ranking Nazi commandants, starting with
Hermann Goering, Hitler's Number Two, were convicted and sentenced to
death. That charge and that alone was deemed sufficient to warrant
hanging.

Unless Saddam Hussein launches an attack on the United States very soon,
any American attack on Iraq without UN approval would be on a legal par
with the Nazi attack on Poland.

A key US argument, that Iraq was somehow linked to the September 11
terror attacks, has been definitively dismissed. In the eighteen months
since, all credible evidence points to intense hostility rather than
cooperation between Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein. Colin Powell, arguing
in front of the UN, failed to prove any cooperative connection.

Iraq has been ordered to disarm by the United Nations, whose legal
legitimacy was essential to the 1991 campaign that drove Saddam Hussein
out of Kuwait.

Thus far, there is no United Nations consensus that the Iraqis have
definitively failed to comply with the terms of that defeat to an extent
that would justify a renewed military attack, one that would inevitably
involve civilian casualties.

With no claim to having been attacked, George W. Bush has instead argued
that his war on Iraq would be "preemptive," meant to prevent Saddam from
launching a future war. But Iraq has not attacked anyone in more than 12
years and two-thirds of the country is under a no-fly zone. Thus Bush is
merely resurrecting the preventative war doctrine invoked by the Nazis
before their Nuremburg hanging.

In 1953 President Dwight Eisenhower, the former Supreme Allied
Commander, dismissed the idea of a preventative war against the Soviet
Union. "All of us have heard this term 'preventive war' since the
earliest days of Hitler," he said. "I don't believe there is such a
thing; and, frankly, I wouldn't even listen to anyone seriously that
came in and talked about such a thing."

George W. Bush has now added to the list of pre-war demands a "regime
change" by which Saddam Hussein would give up power. Bush then proposes
rebuilding Iraq along democratic lines.

But Nazi functionaries at Nuremburg also received stiff sentences for
approving essentially the same totalitarian statutes that now appear in
the Homeland Security, Patriot I and Patriot II Acts authorizing secret
arrest, detention and "disappearances" of American citizens without
legal recourse or public notification. At Nuremburg, such laws were
recognized as a form of state terror.

The embrace of such laws in America casts serious doubt on the Bush
Administration's real willingness to install democracy anywhere else.

When the Nazis attacked Poland in 1939, no one envisioned that just
eight years later Germany would be leveled and its all-powerful
reichmarshalls would be tried and sentenced under international law.

Such a vision seems less far fetched today. America's current military
might has prompted the Bush Administration to frame its proposed war in
terms of a "crusade" against "evil." But military action against Iraq is
guaranteed to inflame the passions of 1.2 billion Muslims. The proposed
war is explicitly opposed by the Pope. International support is
extremely limited. The US itself is deeply divided, with its economy in
serious trouble.

The diplomatic campaign for this attack has been handled with all the
wisdom and foresight of madmen lighting matches in a room full of
gasoline. There is no reason to expect a military campaign would be
handled any better.

It is clear from the precedents at Nuremburg that any American attack on
Iraq without United Nations approval would be illegal under
international law. It is also clear that the inevitable civilian
casualties resulting from such an attack would qualify as crimes against
humanity.

And sooner or later, the American perpetrators of such an attack and
related crimes might well find themselves standing trial before some
sort of Nuremburg-style international tribunal.

Given such circumstances, the guilt of George W. Bush will not be in
doubt. But the guilt of subordinates giving supporting orders, and of
soldiers and functionaries carrying them out, will also be a given.

The Nuremburg court, including its American judges, repeatedly ruled
that those who "only followed orders" in committing atrocities were
guilty of crimes against humanity.

Those willing Americans executioners who "only follow orders" in
perpetrating this illegal attack on Iraq should understand that they
stand to be found just as guilty as the ones giving those orders.

And that one way or another, sooner or later, that guilt will demand
payment.

Bob Fitrakis is publisher of www.freepress.org and author of THE
FITRAKIS FILES: SPOOKS, NUKES & NAZIS. Read his columns here.
(http://www.freepress.org/columns.php?strFunc=display&strAuthor=3)

Harvey Wasserman is senior editor of www.freepress.org and author of THE
LAST ENERGY WAR (Seven Stories Press). Read his columns here.
(http://www.freepress.org/columns.php?strFunc=display&strAuthor=7)

http://www.freepress.org/departments.php?strFunc=display&strID=23&strYear=2003&strDept=13

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to