Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to"hurt" Women

2001-01-29 Thread Nurev Ind Research
-Caveat Lector- Nessie wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > >>>Violence against anyone is bad. > > >>>If he stalks you or breaks into your house - shot'em in the balls. > > >Make up your mind. > > >Self Defense is THE basic human right. > > >Self defense against those who commit violence is a socia

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-29 Thread Nessie
-Caveat Lector- >>>Violence against anyone is bad. >>>If he stalks you or breaks into your house - shot'em in the balls. >Make up your mind. >Self Defense is THE basic human right. >Self defense against those who commit violence is a social good. Self defense against those who commit v

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-29 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector- Well now aren't we having fun, folks. Please let us all tone down the rhetoric. Let us be civil in our discussions, who knows someone might learn something. So let's stop the "fighting talk." If someone threatens you , feel free to report their behavior to their ISP. I f anyone

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-29 Thread flw
-Caveat Lector- >Ha Ha, another Silly Geek ToughGuy!! Just one more mouth breathing girlie boy. >You're just another internet coward, mouthing off from a safe distance. >How come none of you guys ever mouth off to my face? I'm not >THAT hard to track down. Bring it on. Do you hav

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-29 Thread flw
-Caveat Lector- >Violence against anyone is bad. >If he stalks you or breaks into your house - shot'em in the balls. >Make up your mind. Self Defense is THE basic human right. Self defense against those who commit violence is a social good. flw http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org DECLARAT

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-28 Thread Nessie
-Caveat Lector- >Ha Ha, another Silly Geek ToughGuy!! Just one more mouth breathing girlie boy. You're just another internet coward, mouthing off from a safe distance. How come none of you guys ever mouth off to my face? I'm not THAT hard to track down. Bring it on. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-28 Thread Nessie
-Caveat Lector- >Violence against anyone is bad. >If he stalks you or breaks into your house - shot'em in the balls. Make up your mind. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-28 Thread flw
-Caveat Lector- >Men I cut even less slack. If you're a man, don't even look like you're >thinking about hurting me. It's the wrong move. It will precipitate a >preemptive strike. And if you pull a gun, I'll kill you on the spot. >Promise. Insult me to my face, insult my friends in front of me,

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-28 Thread flw
-Caveat Lector- >I also moderate a support list for these > women. I have nothing but the greatest contempt for men who > treat women this way even if it is just in a threat over the > internet. > Amelia Violence against anyone is bad. For too long, so called "women's groups" support policies

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-28 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld
-Caveat Lector- From: "kl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The hell it is. Stating that one doesn't know whether the contents of > > one's post is true or not does NOT say anything about if one ENDORSES > > the contents of the post. One can post something that one doesn't > > know is true or not -- or

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-28 Thread kl
-Caveat Lector- > -Caveat Lector- > > From: "Amelia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I am not saying this is true or not true. Just > > > forwarding. > > > KS > > > > > > The Real Story of Rosa Parks > > > > I have been out most of this week so today is the first > > chance I have had to go over this s

[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-27 Thread Amelia
t; To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 6:08 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women -Caveat Lector- >NESSIE, as for your threats to "hurt" the poster, I did no such thing. I merely defined the con

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-27 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld
-Caveat Lector- From: "Amelia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I am not saying this is true or not true. Just > > forwarding. > > KS > > > > The Real Story of Rosa Parks > > I have been out most of this week so today is the first > chance I have had to go over this situation with the alleged > failure to

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-27 Thread Nessie
-Caveat Lector- >NESSIE, as for your threats to "hurt" the poster, I did no such thing. I merely defined the conditions under which I would hurt the poster (or anybody else, for that matter). I did this by once again restating the by now well known fact that I require people in my physical pre

Re: [CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-27 Thread kl
-Caveat Lector- Amelia, Thanks for a great post. -- Take away the right to say 'fuck' and you take away the right to say 'fuck the government.' -- Lenny Bruce http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytiz

[CTRL] Disclaimers and Men who think they have a right to "hurt" Women

2001-01-27 Thread Amelia
-Caveat Lector- > I am not saying this is true or not true. Just > > forwarding. > > KS > > > > The Real Story of Rosa Parks I have been out most of this week so today is the first chance I have had to go over this situation with the alleged failure to use a disclaimer. The above was at the beg