Will Bush Avoid War? No Bombs Yet May Mean Break With Clinton's Ways 9/17/01 11:54:55 AM Bill White Commentary -- What a difference a president makes. Don't get me wrong -- I want to start this off by saying I am no fan of George Bush, because, frankly, I don't trust him. His father invented the New World Order and drove America knee deep into the morass of Iraq, and I'm not srue the fruit has fallen far from the tree. That said, there is already a big difference. If Bill Clinton were in office today, the United States would already be bombing every aspirin factory from the tip of Morocco to the tip of Indonesia, and everything in between. There wouldn't be a headache in Islam that would find any relief. But as I, and everyone I know, has noticed, the US has not yet dropped a single bomb. They haven't even pointed their fingers at a country they are going to bomb. And though Afghanistan is running scared, there doesn't appear to be any realistic chance that the US will launch an invasion of it any time soon. Despite the orders that have been issued to him by the warmongering Zionists of the world -- the Horowitzs and Podhoretzs and Krauthammers and Levins and Goldbergs of the world, to name a few -- George Bush has not blindly lashed out and declared a war on anyone, not to mention the entirety of Islam, as they urge. Give it another week before we're sure, but I strongly suspect that a Third World War on behalf of Israel against the entirety of the Muslim faith is not in the cards. What is happening? And what does this mean? The details of it I am not yet sure. But it may mean that George Bush, and his advisors, are actually thinking about Mid-East policy. And thinking about Mid- East policy, instead of being led by the nose by the television networks and the major newspapers, is exactly what the Zionists do not want. Now this doesn't mean that George Bush is going to give Zionists the boot, or threaten to behead the sacred cow of aid to Israel. But it may mean that he is considering not asking how high when they say jump. It may also mean, if his political strategists have any sense (which they don't), starting a "national dialogue" on the issue of whether or not Israel is worth the lives of 10,000 American civilians, and the constant fear of terrorist war against this country. Now such a discussion is not going to come on immediately. To do it immediately would get too many insults hurled at Bush for a lesser man of the financial democracy to weather all at once. But the seeds of such a discussions may get layed, and the longer we go without continuing distracting spectacles of violence, the more the American people will start to think about what is going on. Not that there is a lot of thinking going on now. I erected a large sign outside of my house over the weekend stating "This is Israel's War. Let *her* fight it." My neighbors immediately said "Oh, you must be Jewish and supporting Israel." I then went out and added the word "alone" after "Ler *her* fight it." Then I just took it down. People just weren't getting it. But the longer we go without the government whipping the people into mass hysteria, and committing the kind of violent acts needed to distract the people from thinking, the more the issue of "what exactly are we defending in the Middle East" will come forward, and the more the issue of "kill the Arabs" will fade to the background. In the moments after the attack, the Krauthammers and Podhoretzs of the world were demanding war with not just Afghanistan, but Iraq and Syria. Remarkable that this is the war that Israel is preparing to fight. Given that we have taken no action against anyone, if we keep it up, maybe that means we're going to think before we take orders from that little rogue state. In a situation like this, thinking can only be considered good. Libertarian Socialist News Post Office Box 12244 Silver Spring, MD 20908 http://www.overthrow.com (check out our messageboards -- discuss this story on-line!) (Formerly http://www.libertariansocialist.com)
