-Caveat Lector-

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 10:24:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: InterPol report:  JFK,
     Jr. was assassinated (fwd)  -- Critique from Sprunt

This should be fun -- please see some comments from me below
within brackets.

(Actually, reading the stuff below was beyond fun -- it was a
total hoot!  Unless the writer of the original piece below was
trying to be something other than humorous, he's a total
failure.)

Corrections/clairifications to any of my comments below by those
truly in the know are welcomed. . .

Warm regards,
Hugh Sprunt

<< Nature -- Suspect.
 Repeat -- Suspect.
 Case review -- Final -- notwithstanding review.
 Request open Status pending Final.

 Eyes Only -- Chief Bureaus.

 Subject, John F. Kennedy, Jr., left Essex County Airport,
 Caldwell, N.J., at 8:38 P.M. Friday, July 16, 1999 in a Piper
 Saratoga II TC.

[This is the Turbocharged version of the Saratoga.  Right or
wrong, the media accounts which are sufficiently specific refer
to the aircraft as an HP model (perhaps this marketing term by
Piper is the basis for the media comments about the plane being a
hot fast aircraft.  HP apparently means High Performance and
refers to the fact that this model has better performance than
the model with fixed landing gear.  The HP model apparently has a
tricycle landing gear but NOT a turbocharged engine a higher
cruise speed at altitude and a higher range of altitutdes can be
reached.  In each case, turbo or non-turbo, the engine is a 300
HP Continental six cylinder piston engine so far as I know.]

 Aircraft was built in 1995, purchased last year
 by subject. It has been reported to have been in excellent
 condition -- simple and comfortable to fly. Subject did NOT file
 a flight plan (?) and it is suspected he altered his route.

[At this report in such an analysis we would be told the original
route and the alteration, the reason why K would have thought the
alteration would have the result he intended, and the reason why
it did not.]

 We
 strongly suspect this to be true because subject KNEW he was
 under surveillance.

[So why didn't K tell the NYPD, etc., that he was being stalked
-- don't you think he would have gotten a substantial reaction?
If K could tell he was under surveillance, don't you think the
police could spot the same surveillance (not to meniton any PIs K
could have hired.]

 Visibility was eight (8) miles -- I say again -- visibility was
 eight (8) miles. Media reports of "hazy" or "foggy" conditions
 are untrue.

[Interesting statement, but it can be tested via a few phone
calls and faxes. Even if visibility was eight miles (which it
certainly could have been), the writer of our "report" here
apparently does not realize that eight miles visibilty is
materially restricted visibility -- the light 170 feet above the
beach at Gay's head (marine navigation light) can be seen 20
miles away at night under typical conditions of good visibility.]

 Subject's flight path took him over the Connecticut shore. After
 passing over the south-Western tip of Rhode Island aircraft
 banked and began its approach to Martha's Vineyard Airport at
 9:26 P.M. Subject was expected at airport by no later than 10:00
 P.M.

[If he altered his route as stated above, why did he take one of
the standard VFR routes to MV from his departure point -- hug the
north shore of LI sound until the point one turns right for the
short flight over Rhode Island Sound to MV.  Also, One would not
turn over the southwestern tip of Rhode Island to head to MV --
one would do that only if one were headed for Block Island.  One
would instead normally make the right turn in the vicinity of
Newport, RI.  Perhaps the writer means his reference to a turn to
the right over the SW corner of RI to be understood as the
"altered route" he previously referred to?]

 At 9:39 P.M. JFK radioed the Martha's Vineyard Airport
 giving his location. Subject was completely calm, giving no
 indication of any difficulties, stating that he was making his
 final approach,

[This shows the writer's lack of familiarity with aviation terms
-- one does not begin one's "final approach" this far from the
airport WITH a series of turns still to be made to line up with
the landing runway.  "Final Approach"  or "Final" is the last
segment of an approach to a runway -- the stright segment lined
up with the runway.  The other components (not all flown in one
approach usually) are the crosswind leg, the downwind leg, the
base leg, and (finally) the final approach leg.]

 no more than 10 miles from the shore, and 13
 miles from the airport. Subject then began his (final)

[Another give-away -- one does not get cute in reports of the
nature this one claims to be.]

 descent.
 Subject was at 5,600 feet when he headed out over the ocean. When
 he radioed at 9:39 P.M., 17-18 miles West of Martha's Vineyard,
 he was at 2,500 feet.

[If this were a real report as claimed and I was this guy's boss,
I'd fire him -- we just learned that K's plane was in two
materially different locations at the same time -- at 9:39 he was
both "10 miles from shore and 13 miles from the airport"
(geometrically, this combo results in two different geographic
positions -- one northwest of the airport and one southwest of
the airport and 13 miles from it; neither is "17-18 miles [sic]
West of Martha's Vineyard [note -- West, not NW OR SW -- and
17-18 miles west of Martha's Viineyard (the island, not the
airport, note) puts you about 28 miles west of the airport.
Whatever this guy's other problems are, he cannot read a map.]

 When detected on radar 29 seconds later, he
 was at 1,800 feet, 16 miles West of Martha's Vineyard. He was
 then lost off radar. No MAYDAY was ever heard. Tower personnel at
 Martha's Vineyard Airport verified previous data.

 Within app. 10 seconds of this final radio contact at 9:39 P.M.,
 an aircraft fitting the description of the subjects (aircraft)
 and in that same general location was identified on Radar by both
 Military personnel and Martha's Vineyard Airport tower personnel
 as descending 1,200 feet in 12 seconds -- a full, head-long dive,
 in other words.

 A reporter for the Vineyard Gazette newspaper told WCVB-TV in
 Boston that he was out walking Friday night about the time of the
 crash and saw a "big white flash in the sky" just off Philbin
 Beach.

[Guy must have had super eyesight -- the writer previous told us
visibility was 8 miles, but now says that this fellow on the
beach saw a big white flash in teh sky that was (by the writer's
own words) 16 miles or 17-18 miles (take your pick) west of the
MV beach. . . Also "just off" refers to 16-18 miles away?]

 Luggage, a tire, plexiglas, pieces of the cowling have all
 washed up on Philbin Beach. Said reported has now partially
 recanted his story by stating that "perhaps It was a bright light
 from an explosion, but he just cannot be sure". Reporter has been
 "gotten to", compromised. Unknown as to by who, at this time.
 Several local news reports initially (reported) that several
 people SAW and HEARD an explosion in the air over the ocean South
 of Martha's Vineyard towards Eastern Long Island, at the same
 time that subject's plane "went missing". We have confirmed these
 reports by speaking with 4 of the witnesses whom have asked to
 remain anonymous. Detected definite fear on their part.

 All evidence at this time indicates that aircraft was in a fiery,
 head-long crash dive within seconds after the 9:39 radio
 transmission. Aircraft was equipped with a radar transponder That
 transmit a 4-digit ID code and the altitude.

[Yes, but I question whether the 4 digit code would have been
presesnt since the A/C was operating VFR and had filed no flight
plan.  The plane would have shown as an otherwise unidientified
VFR flight, though the transponder (Mode C) would have provided
the altitude to the nearest 100 feet (subject to modest lag if
the A/C were climbing or descending more than a few 100 fpm).]

 Aircraft contained a
 406 MHz satellite distress beacon which would have notified the
 FAA of exact lat. & long. Device was NOT Activated.

[Shows a misunderstanding of the ELT -- most likely it was
destroyed by impact.  If not, guess what, it sunk with the
aircraft, and I rather doubt a 406 MHz signal will get through
one hundred feet of water, even if the ELT was functional.
Again -- looks like this guy does not know what he is talking
about to me -- and also does not know that he does not know what
he is talking about. . . ]

 Believe
 reason as aircraft disintegrated instantly.

[Well, wouldn't surprise me if it were not working!]

 Coast Guard claims of
 an Emergency beacon thought to belong to this aircraft being
 activated and heard, by the Coast Guard at 3:40 A.M., Saturday,
 in Long Island, New York, are as yet unsubstantiated.

 Subject has been reported by all interviewed, including 3 flight
 instructors, to be an excellent pilot who did not take chances.

[This doesn't matter since the data actually indicate that he DID
take many chances on this particular flight -- all laid out by me
in 9 live segments on Fox-TV (Dallas) since Saturday afternoon.]

 Subject had logged many hours and had acquired an abnormal amount
 of expertise for an individual holding a pilots license for only
 15 months.

[Support?]

 In fact, it has been reported that JFK, Jr. had logged
 enough hours, and acquired enough expertise to qualify as a
 Commercial Pilot! He had passed instrument checks with no
 reported difficulties. Although subject did not like Flying at
 night, all information indicates he did so efficiently. Media's
 reports of "pilot error", "failed instrument test and checks" and
 "scared to fly at night" are patently untrue. Standard American
 Media disinformation.

 When SK Alpha team began investigating weather anomalies and any
 possible phenomena, (weather), Radar images/data that have proven
 useful in such investigations, to include the observations of
 Electromagnetic/ radio frequency phenomena, where discovered to
 be missing from the archives for the Eastern Long Island/Martha's
 Vineyard area during the two (2) critical hours in which JFK Jr's
 Plane apparently crashed/disappeared. This is/was more than
 suspect.

 [Yes indeed.  Lunacy, IMHO.  and "SK Alpha"?  Gimme a break.]

 After demanding said data from air control personnel,
 and receiving stammering, red- faced explanations as to it's
 whereabouts, team notes data has been intentionally "misplaced",
 or in fact lost. This indicates that the subject's aircraft was
 indeed "shot out of the sky", with either a C4 charge

[Amazing job of pinpointing explosive type with no data specific
to the claimed explosive type.  This guy needs to take up another
hobby.]

 , placed aft
 the cabin

[Now he know the location on the aircraft even though his report
has no data specific to that point.]

 ,a bomb,

[a bomb is an alternative and distinct from a "C4 charge" ?
Right.]

 activated on descent by a barometric switch or
 a Particle Beam Laser

[Particle Beam Laser -- hoo-hah!  Tom Clancy could do a fantastic
job as this guy's fact-checker.]

 ,fired from Montauk Point.

[We don't know for sure if a laser did it, but if a laser DID do
it it was clearly fired from Montauk Point.  Wow -- how does that
follow.  Why not from Block Island (mcuh closer to the plane than
Montauk), why not from a boat, why not from a Russian Typhoon
Class submarine disguised as a dinner cruiser?]

 Agency is quite familiar with the evil legacy of Montauk Point.

[Um, a particle beam laser (I'm still laughing) follows a
straight line.  Montauk point is about 60 miles from the location
of the aircraft (just off the beach), at least according to the
writer, when the aircraft exploded.  He also says the A/C was at
1800 feet and Montauk Point is at sea level.  Anyone want to
calculate whether an aircraft at 1800 feet MSL is above or below
the visual horizon from Montauk Point?  If the A/C was under the
visual horizon then his laser beam could not do the job, even in
theory.]

 Technology reputed to be null and void is in fact known to be in
 existence there, and being employed against the American public.
 This includes not only this Laser, but (MK-Ultra) mind-control,
 Remote Viewing, the infamous "Montauk chair", and so on. We
 strongly suspect one of the technologies was used against
 subject's aircraft. Currently, evidence points to the Laser,
 although this cannot be completely substantiated.

[I guess I have finally decided that the writer wrote this piece as a
complete joke. . . ]

 Intrigue Assessment is based on following facts:

 A bright light, or explosion was observed by app. 10 people in
 the area of the aircraft's disappearance.

 The headrest, steering yoke, pieces of the cowling, plexiglas and
 carpeting where literally torn apart from/off the plane, floating
 up on Gay Head Beach. This indicates a mid-air explosion not a
 stall and crash.

[Guess what a >100 g impact with the water will do?]

 Debris from the crash have also been washing up
 on the West end of Martha's Vineyard, creating a very wide spread
 area of destruction (in other words, the remains of the aircraft
 are spread out over a very large area of space on the Ocean,
 indicating a mid-air explosion, not a stall and crash).

[Evidence for this statement?]

 Team has examined all recovered physical evidence and
 corroborates damage assessment. Recorded conversations with air
 traffic control all indicate a calm, relaxed pilot in full
 command of the flight, with no difficulties in the final
 approach. Seconds after the last transmission, the explosion was
 observed and contact was lost with subject's plane.

[How was plane tracked to a specific altitude AFTER the putative
explosion?  The only was altitude data comes from the radars in
use is if the transponder aboard is in Mode C.  Guess what the
transponder does (before the "final dive") when the explosion
takes place.  It, um, quits working.  Therefore it would provide
no altitude data, but yet it did (and the writer does here as
well) -- riddle me that one.]

 Previously
 mentioned weather and electromagnetic/radio frequency data has
 been lost, or misplaced.

[Baflegab pure and simple.]

 Since this typically NEVER happens, a
 cover-up of some sort is strongly suspected.

 The wings of the aircraft where NOT torn off, which they would
 have been had subject's plane gone into uncontrollable dive, as
 being reported by the American press.

[Geez, I guess the C4 or the "bomb" could not result in he loss
of the wings -- not even a possibility that if the explosion
itself did not remove them from the plane aerodynamic forces
during the break up would have done so.]

 If aircraft had had engine
 trouble, as reported, it should/could have simply gone into a
 slow glide and made a soft-water landing.

 No MAYDAY was ever heard, indicating catastrophic occurrence. No
 satellite distress beacon was activated, indicating pilot did not
 have time to do so. Forensics and physical evidence thus far in
 regards to suitcases, pieces of the aircraft, etc., indicate a
 violent explosion of some sort, but not that of a C4 type device.

[Gosh, I guess the C4 possibility that he discussed earlier has
been somehow completely discounted by th end of his piece.]

 The aircraft plummeted from the sky at Terminal Velocity. All
 reports from subjects flight instructors indicate a very good
 pilot, who did not take unnecessary chances or risks. Qualified
 for all aspects of flight for the particular aircraft being
 flown. The chances of him losing control and plummeting in the
 manner now being described by the mass media is almost
 impossible.


 We have learned that subject was preparing to either run against
 Hillary Clinton in the New York Primary, or for the Presidency in
 2000 (which we believe he would have won). Knowing Clinton's
 methods of political intrigue, and the app. 300 murders he and
 his wife are guilty of, it is possible this is three more to add
 to the tally. Also, knowing the saga of the Kennedy bloodline,
 and the Illuminati's obsession with this bloodline issue, the
 Kennedys certainly being a member of this organization, it is
 entirely possible that these murders where ordered by (the
 Illuminati) because of a reported feud between the Kennedys and
 the Rockefellers or the Cameron's. The Kennedy's have long been
 very unhappy with the (Illuminati) due to the murder of JFK, Sr.,
 having been threatened and blackmailed into silence.

 Every indicator points towards JFK, Jr. having "had enough" of
 this humiliation and planning on turning his magazine "George"
 into a true political vehicle for change. For the American
 public, not for the New World Order. In fact, he had already
 begun this process by publishing factual exposes on George
 Wallace and the Rabin assassination. This alone is enough to have
 gotten him killed.

 Subject had begun looking into his Father's murder, and had
 developed plans to slowly expose those involved (in his
 magazine). Also; subject was preparing to interview Attorney
 General Janet Reno for a fall issue of his magazine, focusing on
 women in politics. Kennedy requested the interview by telephone
 and letter several weeks ago and, to help advance his request,
 had made sure that Justice Department officials had copies of
 previous issues in which he had interviewed well-known public
 figures.

 Among those Kennedy previously interviewed were Secretary of
 State Madeleine Albright; former White House press secretary Mike
 McCurry; Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan; evangelist Billy
 Graham; and Richard Mellon Scaife, a wealthy contributor to
 conservative groups. After an introduction by Kennedy, the
 interviews were published in question-and-answer format.
 Information we have received indicates that there was concern
 over the nature and content of some of the questions subject
 intended to ask (Janet Reno). Apparently, in a change of venue,
 the format of his questions had been (changed), deciding instead
 to broach such subjects as Waco, the failed impeachment of
 Clinton, the refusal to indict Gore for campaign contribution
 abuses, Johnny Huang and so fourth. It would appear that these
 questions were too "close to home", in a sense, requiring Reno to
 either tell the truth concerning her failure to do her job and
 fulfill the oath she took to uphold the Constitution, or once
 again commit perjury in a public (format). This fits with the
 known change in political awareness and direction of the subject.

 Subject's wife may have been pregnant. Again, the bloodline
 obsession of the Illuminati, not wanting to risk another JFK (for
 the people) and his offspring, had them killed instead. There has
 long been rumors from this evil entity that it was considered a
 mistake that when in 1963 JFK, Sr. was killed, that the remaining
 family were allowed to live. Perhaps they decided to "rectify
 that mistake".

 The American Press/mass media are now releasing news reports that
 are far from factual. In fact, they can be considered, at best,
 to be (classic) disinformation, if not outright lies.

 In the initial reports that where released, the essential truth
 of the situation, the facts were there. However, what is now
 being reported is (essentially) leaving out the essence of truth
 and simply glossing over what actually occurred. Again, what we
 regard as standard American Press procedures, disinformation at
 best. This strongly indicates a cover-up, or else the truth would
 still be reported.

 Although requested onsite by Federal agencies, team has been
 coerced to "back off", albeit subtly and quietly. This particular
 tactic speaks well for itself. We have not "backed off", nor will
 we.

 Kennedy family will NOT comment, other than a prepared speech by
 Caroline. End of prepared statement definitely indicates full
 knowledge and awareness of events surrounding JFK Jr's murder. We
 attempted to interview her, but there were 6 other individuals
 surrounding her, rendering meaningful dialog almost non-existent.


 Conclusion: Subject was a qualified pilot, in control of his
 flight, flying a reasonably new aircraft, in excellent condition.
 Visibility was 8 miles. Wind, calm. All indication from Forensics
 and Physical evidence investigations lend themselves to a violent
 explosion, either from an altitude or barometric pressure device,
 or from a Particle Beam Laser. Aircraft "broke up" in mid-air, as
 evidenced by widespread debris gathered from the ocean and
 several different beaches, and the nature of collateral damage to
 recovered aircraft parts, and items on board or from (the
 aircraft) such as the headrest, foot pedals, steering yoke
 carpeting and so fourth. All showed signs of violent damage,
 having been "ripped" or blown from their normal
 positions/locations. This can only be caused by an onboard
 explosion, or an attack by a missile or Laser.

 Considering the nature of current political leanings of subject,
 and today's political atmosphere in America, and the before
 mentioned facts, there is little doubt that subject was
 assassinated. In fact, team considers this a Political
 Assassination of the highest order. It was meant to alleviate a
 potential threat to the ruling elite. And it succeeded.

 Request final authorization -- return file copy. Eyes Only.
  >>

Conclusion from Sprunt -- don't give up your day job, fella,
assuming you have one.

Warm regards,
Hugh S.

=================================================================
           Kaddish, Kaddish, Kaddish, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to