[CTRL] Kosovo crisis part II

1999-10-25 Thread earthman

 -Caveat Lector-

Eyes Wide Shut

Peter

Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 3:35 PM
Subject: Kosovo crisis part II


Hi,
My name is Milos Markovic, and most of you already know me. During the
aggression of USA and NATO on FRY I was sending e-mails about their crimes,
and now I am starting new fight against KFOR and UNMIK.



Yugoslav people was given a promise by UN, NATO and its members that
peacekeeping force will protect Kosovo, non albanian population there and
that state of Serbia will have control under that province.
Yugoslav people was given a promise by UN, NATO and its members that
Yugoslav army, Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs units will go back to
Kosovo.
All of these promises were signed by representatives of NATO countries in UN
Security Council, Russia, China, for NATO signed by Gen. Jackson.


Now we see that all of it was a big LIE. Serbs are not protected. Every day
more and more people of non albanian population are being killed,
raped.Children are being burned.
Yugoslav army and MUP(Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs) are still
waiting to go back.

Organizations that are under control of state of Serbia are in hands of
UNMIK or in most ceases in hands of Albanian terrorists. Albanians are now
able to print passports, ID..
Albanians are entering Serbian hospitals, schools.they kill people that
work there trying to clean Kosovo out of all non albanian populations


For all of this I wrote I have written facts:
MTA(Military Technical Aggrement)- signed by NATO and VJ says that border of
FRY with Albania and Macedonia will be protected by KFOR. I ask you way then
we have more and more citizens of Albania inside Kosovo and Metohija.
MTA  UNSC Resolution 1244- says that army and police of FRY will go back to
Kosovo as soon as possible. KFOR led by USA is creating situation in wich it
is not able for VJ and MUP to go back.
MTA- says that control of air space over Kosovo will be returned to
organizations of FRY. Control over our air space is still in hands of KFOR
commander.
Do I have to write more-
Media speace- by UN Resolution 1244 Serbia has control over media speace.
People from NATO with their equipment put a stop to signals of Yugoslav TV
stations.



All of these facts you can see at NATO web site!


Sincerely your

Milos Markovic


We are about to go on a Journey. All Aboard
http://sites.netscape.net/gsussnzl/homepage

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Kosovo Crisis - Special Reports 44 - NATO at Odds with Itself

1999-04-21 Thread Kris Millegan

 -Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.stratfor.com/crisis/kosovo/special45.htm
A HREF="http://www.stratfor.com/crisis/kosovo/special45.htm"Kosovo Crisis -
Special Reports 44
/A
-

NATO at Odds with Itself
21 Apr 99 - 0300 GMT

Two massive cross-currents are at work within NATO. There is, on one
hand, strong antipathy toward waging all-out war against Serbia.
Consider that the European Union today was not able to pass a resolution
barring the sale of oil to Serbia. The proposal was blocked by Greece
and Italy, who justified their position by arguing that a blockade must
be preceded by a UN resolution. Underlying the legal niceties was the
fact that neither country wants an intensification of the war. Given
that Greece and Italy are strategically essential to any ground war
because of their port facilities, their unwillingness to simply endorse
an oil embargo poses a serious challenge to any ground campaign. Equally
negative were statements today by German Bundeswehr chief-of-staff Gen
eral Hans-Peter von Kirchbach, who said today that NATO has "an option
to intensify air operations," but that "there are no plans for other
operations. We are convinced that it will not be necessary."

On the other hand, the same Greek government that voted against an oil
embargo did hint earlier today that its ports would be available for use
in a ground war, a substantial softening of its position. The United
States and Britain, at the other extreme, are trying to make it appear
that a ground war is inevitable. Indeed, there are indications of a
build-up of forces in Albania. The arrival of the 82nd Airborne
Division’s advanced guard is more than a security force for the Apaches
that have not yet arrived and the MLRS. They will be joined by other
elements of their division, indicating that a build-up of forces for a
ground war is already underway. Yet, at the very same time, NATO’s
request for an additional 300 U.S. combat aircraft has not yet been
approved, with Pentagon planners saying they are considering the impact
of such a large transfer of forces on other areas of the world.

As we come into Friday’s summit of NATO leaders in Washington, the
cross-currents are dizzying. Just as pressure dramatically increases on
Serbia due to the Greek shift on ports, the EU’s decision on an oil
embargo undermines that pressure. The creation of a deliberate sense of
mystery about the build-up of forces in Albania then encounters a public
unwillingness by the United States to commit requested aircraft.
Statements from Washington and London that NATO is prepared to do
whatever is necessary to solve the crisis is met by German officials
saying that a ground attack is not necessary.

The problem here is not public relations, but a deep split not only
within NATO, but within each individual country over the future course
of the war. There is simply no consensus emerging over what is to be
done. Without such a consensus, NATO cannot act. Each time a consensus
appears to be emerging and pressure on Milosevic builds, the consensus
cracks apart and the pressure bleeds off.

The current stalemate is less in the war than in NATO itself and even
within the U.S. military. Agreement on the next step simply isn’t
emerging. The problem is partly political within countries. But the key
problem remains military. The difficulties inherent in the ground option
are daunting. The strategic implications of a major air build-up are
similarly worrisome. Therefore, each day the world is whipped by
conflicting signals. The only constancy in the signal is what the Serbs
have clearly heard: NATO has not yet locked in a plan. Therefore Serbia
continues to have room for maneuver.
-
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Kosovo Crisis

1999-03-29 Thread Kris Millegan

 -Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.rockfordinstitute.org/
A HREF="http://www.rockfordinstitute.org/"Chronicles - A Magazine of
American Culture/A
-

Kosovo Crisis

In conducting negotiations over the future of Kosovo, the Clinton
administration has deliberately kept both the Congress and the American
people in the dark. What follows is a detailed analysis of information
that is available in the foreign press but has so far received little if
any attention in the US. Although the details are complicated, the basic
situation is very clear:

1) The Clinton administration is calling for a NATO/US solution to the
Kosovo crisis because of a massacre of civilians which allegedly took
place in the village of Racak in Kosovo.

2) A French TV crew was present when Yugoslav police took the village
and say it was a fire-fight between Yugoslav forces and heavily-armed
KLA fighters. Yugoslav forensic authorities have declared the massacre a
hoax: dead KLA soldiers, they way, were redressed in civilian clothes
and piled into a ditch they had dug.

3) The forensic case has been settled by a Finnish team of physicians
brought in by the international community. However, the Finnish team’s
report has not been made public, even though it is now more than three
weeks since the dead have been buried. What is in that report is almost
certainly a confirmation of the Yugoslav position: a) because in leaving
Yugoslavia the Finns made a statement praising the high professional
standards of the Yugoslav forensic pathologists, and b) according to the
respected German newspaper Die Welt, the report is "a hot potato" that
will undermine the US position, and c) an independent forensics team
from Belarus came to the same conclusion as the Yugoslav doctors.

The Kosovo crisis is one of the most complex that an American government
has ever faced. On one side are the claims (somewhat exaggerated) of
majority rule; on the other side are the undisputed facts that Kosovo
is, legally, only a region of Serbia and, historically, the very core of
the Serbian heartland. Whatever the US decides to do about Kosovo, the
Congress and the people have a right to get the full story from the
administration, before even considering the use of intimidation and
force.

Kosovo: The Real Story
Prepared by the editors of Chronicles and The Rockford Institute

Self-inflicted atrocities and stage-managed "massacres" have paid rich
dividends to the Muslim side in Bosnia. In May 1992 the Sarajevo
"Breadline Massacre"-–with TV crews mysteriously in attendance to film
the blood and guts-– facilitated the imposition of punitive sanctions
against Serbia, some of which are still in force. Indian General Satish
Nambiar, UN commander at the time, stated to me (March 6, 1999) that "no
UN officer in the field at the time had any doubt that the Muslims did
it to themselves in order to get political support and sympathy."

In February 1994 the show was repeated at Sarajevo’s Markale market,
with similar results: the Serbs were forced to withdraw heavy weapons
around Sarajevo, and were bombed. for the first time by NATO soon
thereafter. Subsequent UN investigation concluded that the Muslims did
it to themselves (as confirmed by Lord Owen, General Sir Michael Rose
and others), but the report was suppressed on US insistence.

In August 1995 the "Trznica Massacre" in Sarajevo was the opener for
some three weeks of massive American-led air strikes against the Bosnian
Serbs, facilitating a Croat-Muslim offensive that ethnically cleansed
western Bosnia of its Serb inhabitants. No independent investigation of
the incident – as demanded by the Serbs – was even allowed this time.

Right now the Administration is pressuring the Serbs to accept a NATO
force of 28,000 on their territory, including 4,000 US servicemen, as a
result of yet another stage-managed "massacre"-–in the village of Racak
in Kosovo--last January. That "massacre" resulted in Albright’s and
Clinton’s claim that no solution is acceptable in Kosovo unless it
included a NATO force. By now the demand for Serbia to open its borders
to some tens of thousands of foreign soldiers, or face NATO bombing, has
become an immutable tenet in Washington’s approach to the region. The
fact that the event which enabled the interventionists within the
Administration to formulate such policy was entirely bogus, while
largely known in Europe, is being actively suppressed by the US.

The facts of the case are as follows:

On January 16, 1999, from coast to coast US media went into a state of
righteous rage over the "discovery" of 45 dead Albanians at Racak,
allegedly "civilians butchered in cold blood."

The head of the OSCE observer mission in Kosovo, American diplomat
William Walker, immediately and categorically asserted that the Serbs
were to blame. Belgrade's claim that the forty five bodies were in fact
KLA guerrillas fallen during the fight in the surrounding areas was
scornfully rejected in Washington as "Serbian propaganda." Not