-Caveat Lector-

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22922

NRA: Bill of Rights' best defender


By Debbie Schlussel

© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

Few things make me prouder to be an American than the National Rifle Association.

Speaking at the NRA's 2001 Annual Meeting, Sunday in Kansas City, Mo., I've never been 
surrounded by so
many so dedicated to preserving our freedoms.

While the popular media tries to portray the NRA rank and file as right-wing wackos 
and rednecks, that's
quite a different vision from what I saw. In fact, the thousands of NRA members I met 
looked like you or me --
the average American you'd see in your hometown. Clean cut, well-groomed and 
fashionably dressed, each
one could be your neighbor -- the one you'd invite to your Fourth of July picnic.

The NRA is a lot different than Hollywood and Peter Jennings would have you believe. 
Eight of 76 members of
the NRA's governing board of directors are Jewish, for instance -- more than 10 
percent. At the convention,
there were quite a few blacks -- like conservative columnist and radio host Armstrong 
Williams, plenty of
women -- like actress Susan Howard ("Dallas") and plenty of others you wouldn't expect 
if you believe what
you hear on TV and read in conventional newspapers. The NRA is a cross-section of 
America, more
representative than many other organizations -- including the self-anointed Million 
Moms, a largely
upper-middle-class group of soccer moms and semi-celebrities who push gun control.

But what doesn't make NRA members average is their dedication to our basic civil 
rights. They recognize that
without a strong Second Amendment, Americans might as well forget the rest of the Bill 
of Rights -- especially
the First Amendment's free speech protections.

Anyone who doubts that, hasn't been following the so-called campaign finance reform 
efforts of Sen. John
McCain over the last couple of years. Make no mistake about it. McCain's claim to be 
worried about money's
alleged control over the election process is phony. This is simply a McCain attempt to 
score political
popularity points at the expense of our most precious freedom -- political speech. And 
clearly, the free speech of
the NRA is McCain's biggest target, as evidenced by the senator's comments on Sunday's 
political shows.
McCain attacked the NRA because he lost -- fair and square -- the South Carolina 
Republican Primary and did
not get to be president.

And, while campaign finance reform was the centerpiece of his campaign there, the NRA 
was his primary
target. In the battle between McCain and free speech, the NRA won.

And the NRA is still winning. The Million Moms, who never were a million, are 
faltering. Almost all of their
candidates lost the 2000 elections, and -- as reported by Independence Institute 
scholar and National Review
columnist Dave Kopel -- they laid off 30 of their 35 staffers. In contrast, the NRA is 
a record 4.3 million
members strong and growing -- one of the largest citizen organizations in America. 
Over 86 percent of
NRA-endorsed candidates won their elections, and Fortune Magazine just named the NRA 
as the most
influential lobbying group in America. Even in Hollywood, which hates the NRA and 
disdains average
Americans, shows that proudly feature guns in crime-fighting -- like Pamela Anderson's 
"VIP" and Chuck
Norris' "Walker, Texas Ranger" (which just ended a ratings-winning 9 seasons) -- are 
hits.

By comparison, Arnold Schwarzenegger's "The Sixth Day" -- for which he refused to 
appear holding a gun in
promotional posters -- was a dud. Best of all, annoying, super-sized, gun-grabbing 
loudmouth Rosie
O'Donnell, whose ratings have sunk since she attacked Tom Selleck for his NRA 
affiliation, announced she's
leaving the airwaves after next season.

Even Steven Yokich, leader of the United Auto Workers union, paid backhanded respects 
to the NRA's positive
influence on his own members, when he frantically used union members' forced dues to 
fund dual attacks on
the NRA and campaign pushes for Al Gore, last fall. He recognized, as did the NRA, 
that many union
members believe in the Second Amendment. The NRA brought President Charlton Heston and 
Vice President
Wayne LaPierre on speaking tours of swing states with heavy union populations. That's 
why, last year,
traditionally Democratic, union-dominated states like Arkansas and West Virginia, 
voted for a Republican
presidential candidate.

But the NRA's popularity is not about guns or hunting or big money. It's about freedom.

The average NRA member is not a wealthy person. He or she is not like Denise and Marc 
Rich or Peter
Buttenweiser -- one of the Democrats' largest soft-money donors. Many of them are 
Yokich's working-class
union members, working the assembly line, like my late cousin Marc -- a target of 
union-paid gun-related
propaganda supporting Al Gore. Or moms raising children at home. They want the same 
freedom as the
wealthy to protect themselves -- and to support or oppose politicians who want to 
preserve or attack,
respectively, that right. And since they cannot individually afford costly television 
advertising, they join the
NRA, which represents them collectively and runs ads reflecting their desire to 
preserve their constitutional
rights.

John McCain wants to take those rights away. His McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance 
Reform Act would
reform free political speech -- the basis for the very establishment of this nation -- 
out of existence. It prohibits
issue ads mentioning a candidate's name in the crucial 60 days prior to an election. 
Just imagine the Boston
Tea Party or Paul Revere's ride under McCain-Feingold.

"No taxation without. ... We now pre-empt this protest of the British Stamp Act for 60 
days due to the
proclamation of Lord John McCain."

"One if by land, two if by -- oops, Landholder McCain says we can't mention the King's 
name right now. See
ya in 60 days."

McCain's bill is not a question of "Big Brother" vs. "Big Money." It will not restrict 
the wealthy who can find
ways around campaign finance reform, like buying offshore broadcasters. But it will 
protect the jobs of
incumbents, like Sen. McCain, and other members of the Senate -- at least two-thirds 
of whom are millionaires.
Competition, as American as apple pie, will be a thing of the past in elections. Think 
Senatrix Hillary for life.
If you run your own small website attacking, say, Teddy Kennedy, imagine having to 
take it offline for 60
days before an election. The Wall Street Journal recently ran an article about one 
such website operator. The
Federal Election Commission told him he'd have to file "independent expenditure 
reports." And under
McCain's fascist bill, he'd have to shut down.

There's only one possible benefit of McCain's anti-democratic legislation. He recently 
began appearing in
annoying, unnecessary, pro-trigger-lock "public service" ads at a theater near you. 
Bankrolled to the tune of
$250,000 by pro-gun control "Americans for Gun Safety" -- which is funded by 
Monster.com's billionaire
founder -- they are nothing more than McCain for president ads, which would be 
proscribed under his bill.

Or maybe not.

Hollywood and public service ads are not included in McCain's campaign finance 
restrictions. And union
actions, like Yokich's anti-NRA leaflets, were specifically excluded and allowed.

In the NRA forum in which I spoke, pollster Kellyanne Fitzpatrick Conway, president of 
The Polling
Company, pointed out that campaign finance reform is unimportant to voters. A recent 
ABC
News/Washington Post poll confirmed this, with campaign finance reform ranking 16th 
out of 18 issues in
importance to Americans. Even in the New Hampshire Primary, only 9 percent of McCain 
voters cited it as
their reason for voting McCain.

So why is it so important to McCain? As someone once said, "Truth is hate to those who 
hate the truth." To
John McCain, truth is a campaign commercial, and those who hate it push for 
anti-democratic campaign
finance reform.



Debbie Schlussel is a political commentator and attorney. She is a frequent guest on 
ABC's "Politically Incorrect with Bill
Maher" and Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes" in addition to being a daily 
political commentator on the
nationally syndicated morning radio show, "Mancow's Morning Madhouse." Click here to 
participate in an online
discussion group of Debbie's commentary.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to