-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

http://www.latimes.com/print/opinion/20000123/t000007103.html

Sunday, January 23, 2000

Outfitting China's Military--Again

Commerce Dept. works to allow the export of a tool like the ones
that prompted a Justice Dept. indictment.

By GARY MILHOLLIN

     Just over two months ago, CATIC, the Chinese military and
aviation giant, was indicted for diverting American machine tools
to a Chinese cruise missile and military aircraft plant. The
powerful machines had produced parts for the B-1 strategic bomber
and the MX nuclear missile, and CATIC was charged with lying to
get the machines out of the U.S. in 1995 by promising to restrict
them to civilian use.

     Yet with the ink barely dry on the indictment, the Clinton
administration has begun to undermine it. According to U.S.
officials, the Commerce Department wants to allow one of CATIC's
sister companies to buy the same kind of American machine tool
that CATIC is accused of diverting. "Even in the face of an
indictment," said one government official familiar with the case,
"there is no behavior change. It is still business as usual." If
the deal goes through, it will show that there are no real limits
on high-tech exports to China.

     The export in question is a five-axis milling machine, a
computer-controlled marvel similar to the machines listed in
CATIC's indictment. It is capable of making high-precision parts
for China's next generation of fighters, bombers and missiles.

     A company in Milford, Mass., named Bostomatic has requested
permission to sell the machine to China's Xian Aero Engine Co.,
which makes engines for China's military aircraft, including the
nuclear-capable H-6 strategic bomber. Bostomatic was purchased
last year by the Agie Charmilles Group, a Swiss concern.
According to U.N. inspectors, 11 of Agie's machine tools were
found at five of Saddam Hussein's leading nuclear weapon and
missile sites in 1992. And in January 1999, Gen. Alexander
Zdanovich, a spokesman for Russia's foreign intelligence
services, said that Agie also had supplied Iran with equipment
for making liquid-fueled ballistic missiles.

     Why does the Commerce Department want to allow a suspect
Swiss conglomerate to sell a sensitive American product to a
Chinese military aircraft plant? The Commerce Department is
supposed to protect the American public from such risks but,
instead, is trying to promote trade no matter what the cost to
national security.

     The Pentagon is fighting the export license. The same
officials who tried to block the export of the machines that
CATIC diverted in 1995 are objecting to this one. The officials
were right the last time, but got overruled. Xian Aero Engine is
pledging to use the milling machine only to make civilian
aircraft. That is what CATIC promised. Since Xian and CATIC are
part of the same state-owned organization, no one should be
fooled.

     Nor should anyone be fooled by the CATIC indictment. It took
more than four years for the Justice Department to get around to
it, and Justice is dragging its feet in a string of other
apparently illegal exports of U.S. high technology.

     In 1996, Silicon Graphics Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.,
sold four supercomputers to one of Russia's leading nuclear
weapon laboratories without the required export license. The U.S.
computers were 10 times more powerful than anything the Russians
had. After the deal was done, Russia's nuclear chief told the
press that Russia would start designing its warheads with
simulated explosions using the American computers. There is
considerable evidence that Silicon Graphics broke the law. It
knew it needed a U.S. export license and did not get one. The
case was sent to a a federal grand jury in 1997, where it has
languished.

     Also in 1996, Silicon Graphics sold a powerful supercomputer
to China's Academy of Sciences, which develops nuclear warheads
and long-range missiles, and IBM sold an equally powerful
supercomputer in 1997 to the Indian Institute of Science, India's
leading missile research site. Neither Silicon Graphics nor IBM
bothered to obtain the required export licenses.

     The Cox committee on Chinese spying found that Hughes
Electronics and Loral Space and Communications, two big American
satellite makers, "deliberately acted without the legally
required licenses and violated U.S. export control laws" when
they helped China improve its rockets in 1995 and 1996. To boost
their profits, these U.S. firms gave China technology that could,
in the committee's words, increase "the reliability of all PRC
ballistic missiles." A federal grand jury has had these cases for
more than a year and a half.

     The message from these cases is the same: Get the exports
out, and don't worry about the law. The Justice Department
probably won't indict you, and even if it does, the Commerce
Department will help you get what you need.

- - -

Gary Milhollin Is Director of the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear
Arms Control, a Washington-based Group That Works Against Arms
Proliferation

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to