-Caveat Lector-
WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!
Satellites pinpoint Russian nuclear arms in Baltics
By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
U.S. spy satellites have located the exact position of Russian
tactical nuclear weapons in the Baltic enclave of Kaliningrad,
contradicting Moscow's contention that it had not transferred the
battlefield arms. Top Stories
• U.S. opens inquiry into Rich gifts
• Visitors on sub guests of admiral
• Russian forces conduct massive war-games exercise
• Military finds refreshing change with new commander in chief
• Palestinian driver uses bus as a weapon, kills eight
Satellite photographs first revealed the transfers June 3 when
the weapons were spotted aboard a Russian military train at a seaport
near St. Petersburg, according to U.S. intelligence officials.
A second intelligence breakthrough took place June 6 when spy
satellites detected the arrival of the nuclear arms in Kaliningrad,
said officials familiar with intelligence reports who spoke on the
condition of anonymity.
The weapons were moved by ship from the Russian port to a
special nuclear storage bunker near a military airfield in
Kaliningrad, a small Russian enclave between Poland and Lithuania on
the Baltic Sea.
The satellite photographs have refuted Russian government
denials about the transfer or deployment of nuclear arms in
Kaliningrad. The transfers were first reported by The Washington
Times on Jan. 3.
"The Russians are denying it, but we know better," said one
defense official. Debate within the U.S. government has ceased on the
nuclear transfers.
The disclosure of the tactical nuclear arms transfers prompted
statements of concern by the governments of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia
and Estonia. Moscow has refused inspections of all military
facilities in Kaliningrad by those governments.
Polish Defense Minister Bronislaw Komorowski called for
inspections of Kaliningrad to determine whether the nuclear arms were
deployed there. The State Department did not support the call for
inspections, even though Poland is now a member of the NATO alliance.
Under an informal agreement reached between the United States
and Russia in 1992, Moscow was to remove all tactical nuclear weapons
from forward-deployed areas and said they had done so.
Russian President Vladimir Putin last month dismissed reports of
the nuclear arms in Kaliningrad as "rubbish."
U.S. intelligence is still trying to determine the exact type of
the nuclear arms. They were described in reports as either nuclear
naval, ground forces or air-delivered weapons.
The weapons in Kaliningrad are based in what the Pentagon calls
a nuclear storage site, a special facility used to house nuclear arms.
The intelligence photographs, gathered by the Pentagon's array
of reconnaissance satellites, confirmed suspicions dating back to
1998 about the deployment of tactical nuclear arms in Kaliningrad,
the officials said.
Russia has between 4,000 and 15,000 tactical nuclear weapons,
none of which is covered by formal U.S.-Russian arms control
agreements. They include short-range missile warheads, nuclear-armed
torpedoes and air-dropped nuclear bombs.
A Pentagon spokesman told The Washington Times last month that
the deployment of tactical nuclear arms to Kaliningrad violates
Moscow's pledge to keep the Baltic region a "nuclear-free" zone.
The nuclear transfers were not reported in formal Pentagon
intelligence reports until December, fueling speculation among some
officials that the information was withheld from U.S. government
policy-makers for diplomatic reasons. Intelligence officials denied
the information was withheld.
After the disclosures last month, the State Department sent a
formal diplomatic note to the Russians asking for an explanation of
the deployment.
The Russian government replied by repeating Moscow's public
denials insisting that there were no nuclear arms in Kaliningrad,
U.S. officials said.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser during the Carter
administration, said the nuclear arms in Kaliningrad are a political
problem more than a serious strategic worry.
"It tells us something about the dogged attitudes of the Russian
military and political leaders," Mr. Brzezinski said in an interview.
"It's conduct you would not expect from a responsible government
that generally wants to be part of the partnership of the European
community, as Putin has indicated," Mr. Brzezinski said.
"No one likes to be sitting next to nuclear weapons, stored or
unstored," he said.
But efforts by Polish and Baltic-nation governments to seek
nuclear inspections will be difficult because there are no formal
agreements allowing such reviews, Mr. Brzezinski said.
As for Russian government denials, Mr. Brzezinski said: "The
fact that the Russian government denies it . . . is probably an
affirmation that it is true."
Richard Perle, a senior defense official in the Reagan
administration, said the movement of the weapons would be a concern
if it is part of a Russian strategy against NATO.
Moscow said in 1998 that it would deploy nuclear weapons into
forward areas of Europe in response to the expansion of the NATO
alliance. The 1999 expansion brought in Poland, Hungary and the Czech
Republic. Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia have expressed an interest in
joining the alliance.
As for the weapons themselves, Mr. Perle said, they are "not a
deep concern."
"The movement of nuclear weapons from one location to another
might have troubled me in the Cold War, but not now," said Mr. Perle,
an adviser to George W. Bush during the presidential campaign.
*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]
Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
