-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/11/2002 6:25:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why isn't the government calling this a
terrorist act?
They don't think the shooter is a Moslem Prudy
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/12/02 4:54:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They don't think the shooter is a Moslem Prudy
I don't know if that line will hold up or not. The gunman at the El Al ticket
counter in Los Angeles on the 4th of July was a Moslem and the FBI refused to
-Caveat Lector-
Because they know who it
is!
The Mermaid
xx
- Original Message -
From:
Prudy L
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 12:54
PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Why don't they call
the DC sniper a terrorist?
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: Bill Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 10/10/02 10:04:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it because it might not be a Muslim?
Yup, remember the Egyptian who killed two people at the EL AL counter in Los
Angeles? The FBI told us
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/11/02 2:26:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As much as I don't like the idea of government trying to placate people,
not
calling it a terrorist act did have the effect of making it less terrifying
than if they had.
Here's a thought. Why, if the
-Caveat Lector-
Not at all
They want hysteria, but they want carefully directed hysteria. They want you
afraid of the kind of terrorists that have cells and meetings and leaders
and things you can bomb. And a weird foreign name helps. Also oil if
possible. Anything to keep the hatred pointed in
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/10/02 10:04:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it because it might not be a Muslim?
Yup, remember the Egyptian who killed two people at the EL AL counter in Los
Angeles? The FBI told us that wasn't a Terrorist act, also. The government
won't lie to us
-Caveat Lector-
As I said then
The govt. wants to rewrite the definition of terrorist to only include
those who can be fought by armies.
If terrorism is something that an individual can do, without warring or
planning, then the war on terrorism is seen as the joke it is.
on 10/11/02 11:47
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/11/02 9:54:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The govt. wants to rewrite the definition of terrorist to only include
those who can be fought by armies.
You may have stumbled onto something here.
A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION
-Caveat Lector-
That and pressure from the gun lobby to have terrorism involve explosives
while this is just a good ol' American shootin'
on 10/11/02 1:51 PM, Bill Howard at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/11/02 9:54:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/11/02 12:57:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That and pressure from the gun lobby to have terrorism involve explosives
while this is just a good ol' American shootin'
Haven't heard much about bio-terrorism or chem-terrorism beyond the middle
easterners
-Caveat Lector-
That is really a cheap shot!
JR
- Original Message -
From: thew
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Why don't they call the DC sniper a
terrorist?
-Caveat Lector-That and pressure from the gun lobby to
have "terrorism"
Title: Why don't they call the DC sniper a terrorist?
-Caveat Lector-
Is it because it might not be a Muslim?
-- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- --- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- -
We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is
13 matches
Mail list logo
