-Caveat Lector-

>From http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/comment/0,10551,721188,00.html

}}}>Begin
Comment



Was Barak telling the truth?

The ex-PM's disparagement of the Palestinians began long ago

Yoav Peled
Friday May 24, 2002
The Guardian

Astute observers of Israeli politics have been wondering, ever since Ehud Barak was
elected prime minister in 1999, whether his "peace offensive" was a real effort to
achieve peace with Israel's neighbours or only an attempt to "expose" the Arabs'
intention of destroying Israel.

The debate intensified when the failure of the Camp David II summit in the summer
of 2000 was almost universally interpreted as a rejection by Yasser Arafat of Barak's
"generous" offer to end Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and enable
the Palestinians to establish an independent state.

An interview Barak recently gave to Benny Morris - a convert to the cause of the
Israeli rightwing - which was published in the New York Review of Books (and
reprinted in this newspaper yesterday) allows a glimpse into some of his underlying
assumptions.

The controversy over what actually transpired at Camp David is well known by now,
and Barak's version of events is disputed (yet again) in the same issue of the New
York Review by Robert Malley and Hussein Agha. What is more revealing is Barak's
view of the people with whom he was purportedly trying to reach a peace agreement.

"Repeatedly during [the] interview," Morris reports, Barak spoke of the Palestinians
as products of a culture "in which to tell a lie ... creates no dissonance. They don't
suffer from the problem of telling lies that exists in Judaeo-Christian culture. Truth 
is
seen as an irrelevant category. There is only that which serves your purpose and that
which doesn't." Curiously, Morris, who did more than anybody to dispel official Israeli
lies about the war of 1948, does not record his own reaction to these racist
stereotypes.

Polite western society no longer tolerates such characterisations of entire cultures,
although I suspect things may have changed, at least in the US, since September 11.
But in Israel the public denigration of Arab culture was historically acceptable, 
since,
like all colonial movements, Zionism had to dehumanise the indigenous inhabitants
of its country of settlement in order to legitimise their displacement. Thus, as many
studies have shown, depictions of the Arabs as conniving, dishonest, lazy,
treacherous and murderous were commonplace in Israeli school textbooks, as in
much of Israeli literature in general.

For the past two decades, however, Israeli society has been going through a
profound and wide-ranging process of liberalisation. A great deal of effort was
invested, by the upper-middle strata of Jewish Israeli society (the people who voted
for Barak in 1999), in the struggle against the mutual stereotyping of Jews and
Palestinians.

A whole industry of "dialogue and coexistence" groups sprouted up. As a result,
generalisations such as the ones used by Barak were delegitimised to the point
where it became difficult, in classroom situations for example, to make any general
statement about a particular group in society. Tragically, all of this was halted by 
the
breakdown of the peace process and the onset of the second intifada.

The question, then, is whether Barak's statements reflect a genuine frustration over
the Palestinians' response to his peace efforts; are an effort to cater to changing
public opinion; or whether he held this view of the Palestinians all along.

As chief of staff of the Israeli Defence Force, he opposed the Oslo accords, and as
minister of the interior in Yitzhak Rabin's cabinet he abstained in the crucial vote on
the Oslo II agreement. When he took office as prime minister he reneged on the
commitments undertaken by his predecessor, Benjamin Netanyahu, in the Wye
Plantation agreement, to further withdraw from occupied Palestinian territory. And
throughout his tenure as prime minister he refused to abide by any clause of the Oslo
agreements that mandated further Israeli "concessions" to the Palestinians. This
behaviour is perfectly understandable if the Palestinians are all pathological liars 
and
agreements signed by them are not to be trusted.

During Barak's year and a half in office as prime minister, he kept warning that Israel
was like a ship heading towards certain collision with an iceberg, and that his peace
efforts were crucial for avoiding a catastrophe. Unfortunately, what is revealed in the
Morris interview is that the captain of the ship may have been blinded by prejudice,
so that instead of avoiding the iceberg he sailed full steam ahead right into it.

Yoav Peled teaches political science at Tel Aviv University. He is co-author, with
Gershon Shafir, of Being Israeli: The Dynamics of Multiple Citizenship (CUP).

· Israel/Palestine: The Way Forward, a Guardian discussion with Yasser Abed Rabbo
and Yossi Beilin takes place at Church House, Dean's Yard, Westminster, London
SW1 on Wednesday May 29 at 2pm. Entrance by ticket only (£10); call 020-7494
5551

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
End<{{{

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to