-Caveat Lector-
from an email:
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc.
4000 Steeles Avenue, West # 221
Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada L4L 4V9
Telecopier : 905.851.5108
PLEASE FILE AT ONCE
EMBARGO until December 04, 1998 ñ 12:01am
Dossier No. : JAN/48/95
Distribution:
Judicial Court Exhibit
United States of America Government Attn: The
Honorable,
U. S. President William Jefferson Clinton
Jacques ANTENEN
U. S. Vice President Albert Gore, Jr.
U. S. Attorney General Janet Reno CANTON DE
VAUD
United States Senate
Juge DíInstruction
United States House of Representatives Du Canton
De Vaud
U. S. Department of State
Valentin 34
United States Department of the Treasury 1014 Lausanne
Internal Revenue Service
Switzerland
Central Intelligence Agency
U. S. Federal Bureau of Investigation
New Republic/USA Financial Group, Ltd Gesellschaft (Austria)
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc. / AmeriTrust (Suisse) Societe
WhiteCloud Petroleum Corporation (Delaware)
To: Carrard, Paschoud, Heim & Associes
Avocats au Barreau
8, rue de la Grotte
1003, Lausanne, Switzerland
Telefon : 41 21 341 90.40
Telefax : 41 21 341.90.50
Attention of :- Monsieur Felix Paschoud, Avocat
In the matter of: AmeriTrust Corporation account / Ambassador Leo
Emil Wanta, SDR Diplomatic Passport No. 04362 /
Ambassador Giovanni Ferro, dated November 23,
1998, received November 27, 1998 ñ as to Suisse
Court Examination, scheduled for 04 December 1998
with The Honorable, J Antenen, under the Dossier
No.
JAN/48/95, Canton de Vaud, Juge DíInstruction,
Valentin 34, 1014 Lausanne, Switzerland,
regarding
the following pertinent classified and
sensitive
USGovernment (USG) information Ö..
1/20
Our corporate response, however, will be pursuant to the United States of
America, U. S. House of Representatives H. R. 3723 law as shown below:-
WHEREAS, The President of the United States of America, having signed
H. R. 3723 on October 11, 1996, has protected this transaction by allowing
Corporations the right to declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal
Procedures
and Information, and the transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade
Secret fully protected under the Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of
the United States of America and the International Economic Community.
INASMUCH, the names, identities, bank coordinates and other identifying
information of persons or entities that are party to this transaction,
contained
herein, or learned hereafter, shall be a Corporate Trade Secret that shall
not
be disseminated other than as provided for herein, or as allowed under
applicable law. Any unauthorized Disclosure of this Private Transaction,
parties to, or other material fact of, shall subject the violator(s) to
Criminal
Prosecution.
HAVING SAID THAT, I have obtained a limited release to protect the
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc. and its Corporate Officers named above, as
this particular USA Corporation ñ with other USG corporations
to be
named later ñ was duly organized under U.S.C.A. Title 18,
Section 6,
which reads:-
USCA Title 18 ~ Sec 6 ñ Department and Agency defined
includes any department, independent establishment, commission,
administration, authority, board or bureau of the United States or
any
corporation in which United States has a proprietary interest, Ö..
June
25, 1948, c. 645, 62 Stat 685)
11) [ the phrase ì corporationî in which the United States has a
proprietary interest is intended to include those governmental
corporations in which stock is not actually issued, as well as
those in which stock is owned by the United States.]
5. Defenses
if a department or agency has colorable authority to
do what
it is doing, constitutionality of statute or order requiring
keeping of
records, furnishing of information ---------- (Humble Oil &
Refinery
Co. vs SCA NM 1952, 198F 2d 753, certiorari denied 73 Sct 328,
344 US 909, 97 Ed 701)
2/20
Per my original United States Government directives and Oath ÖÖ.
We must learn to subvert, sabotage, and destroy our enemies
by more sophisticated, and more effective methods than those
used against us ÖÖÖ.
As we are facing an implacable enemy whose avowed objective
is world domination by whatever means and at whatever cost Ö
Points of truthful information :
The USGovernment and AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc. entered into a
Buy/Sell Contract with Humewood Enterprises of London and Dublin to
facilitate the bank to bank delivery of Credit-Worthy Bank Guarantees
with
Rothschild Bank, Banque Paribas, Lloyds Bank, et al with USG / AmeriTrust
retaining Credit Suisse Bank Senior Management and FGI Fiduciarie-conseil of
Lasaunne as the corporate fiduciary agent with Credit Suisse Groupe, on
behalf
of AmeriTrust; and per Vincent Foster, Jr., Deputy White House Counsel
to
corporately organize the Suisse Holding Groupe - registered AmeriTr
ust
(Suisse) Societe, Geneve, Switzerland and our Suisse residency per
USG
directives, and we can not assist your court with highly confidential data
relative to
Attorney Fosterís Irrevocable Bank Payment Orders in the aggregate USDollar
amount of US$250,000,000.00, and issued in favour of The Childrenís Defense
Fund, Washington, DC, USA ñ as We, AmeriTrust, have no working and/or
personal knowledge of any Money Laundering schemes, as falsely alleged ñ but,
We can advise this Suisse Judicial Court that under a certain
Commercial
Contract, L H Finance (Mossah) agreed to issue a Surety Bond for
US$250,000.00 as a condition of said contract; and then advised AmeriTrust
that
they would release US$375,000.00 as a Cash Deposit Performance Guarantee,
allowing US$125,000.00 to cover Introduction Fees to Deputy White House
Counsel Vince Foster, Jr., but only through the Suisse Fiduciary Agent ñ
Ms
Elaine Guiraud, at the Union Bank of Switzerland, Account No. 320.904.60W
on or about June 22, 1993 prior to Mr Fosterís scheduled arrival at Hotel
de la
Paix, Geneve on July 7, 1993 per previous financial arrangements.
As the monetary disbursal was arranged through a Ms Lorrayne Fine, Principal
of
L H Finance, as the required Performance Bond was submitted in the event of
their
Non-Performance per the Commercial Contract, prepared with Mr Foster ñ and
presently in the Courtís possession - allowing due to their non-performance
the
USDollar amounts to be disbursed as follows:
Mr Vincent Foster, Jr., Esq. USDollars 125,000.00
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc. USDollars 250,000.00
3/20
As the USDollar funding was obtained through L H Finance in conjunction with
our
corporate fiduciary agent, Ms Elaine Guiraud of Lausanne, I would have no
idea the
original origin of the Cash Performance Bond funding, as we were advised
it was
certified by Union de Banques Suisses as good, clean, clear,
freely-transferable and
of non-criminal origin. It was at the insistence of Credit Suisse Banque
that AmeriTrust
Corporation, Inc. retain FGI Fiduciaire-conseil and Ms Millie Ferrus, as our
AmeriTrust Corporation Suisse Counsel, to meet the Suisse banking
requirements
which was subsequently authorized and approved by the USGovernment
authorities.
Why at this late date [ since I have been vigorously complaining since my
False Arrest
on July 7, 1993 enroute to meet Counsel Foster in Geneve ] is the Suisse
Government
investigating the alleged Murder of Vince Foster and inquiring of the
contracted origin of
the USDollar transfers, and now causing lawless court action and potential
RICO
substantial recovery damages, as well as Civil damages in favour of
AmeriTrust, its
Corporate Officers and the American People; whereby USDollar Seventy
Billion
(US$70,000,000,000.00) was illegally diverted from the United States
Treasury during my HOSTAGE STAY in Switzerland and the State of
Wisconsin, USA ; from the retained / contracted earnings obtainable
through the
AmeriTrust/Humewood Contract, et al. [ see exhibit ìPower of Attorneyî]
As your advocacy office is fully aware, based on the illegally seized USGovn
and
Somali documents that National Security violations were unlawfully discussed
and copied
in the present of by the Suisse and State of Wisconsin ñ Department of
Revenue
provocateurs, and in direct violation of the Vienna Convention as listed:-
Article 29 ñ Personal Inviolability
The person of a diplomatic agent shall be inviolable. He shall not be liable
to any form of
arrest or detention. The receiving State shall treat him with due respect
and shall take all
appropriate steps to prevent any attack on his person, freedom or dignity.
Article 31 ñ Immunity from Jurisdiction
4/20
A diplomatic agent shall enjoy immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of
the receiving State. He shall also enjoy immunity from its civil and
administrative jurisdiction.. (See Diplomatic papers enclosed)
Furthermore, Diplomatic personal baggage were unlawfully seized, and
never
returned under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention.
Article 40 ñ Duties of Third States
1. If a diplomatic agent passes through or is in the territory of a
third state,
which has granted him a passport visa if such visa was
necessary, while
proceeding to take up or to return to his post, or when returning to
his own
country, the third state shall accord him inviolability and such
other
immunities as may be required to ensure his transit or return.
See exhibits, which include the diplomatic correspondence of :-
U. S. President William Jefferson Clinton to Ambassador Leo Wanta, dated
20 December 20, 1994,
U. S. Vice President Albert Gore, Jr. to Ambassador Leo Wanta, dated
January 3, 1995,
State of Israel, Ministry of Internal Affairs INVITATION dated July 31, 1997
and addressed to The Honorable, Ambassador Leo E Wanta to discuss Israeli
matters of State and the Region.
Please take Special Notice Ö..
On November 03, 1993, the Prime Minister of the State of Israel ñ The
Honorable, Yitzhak Rabin after several Israeli demands of the Suisse
Federation to release Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta, The Executive
Chairman/Director of AmeriTrust, Inc.
presently occupying Suisse Dungeon Cell No. 130, within Prison du Bois ñ
Mermet, CH du Bois ñ Gentil, 1018 Lausanne, Switzerland, relative to
AmeriTrust to release the negotiated deposits to the Prime Ministerís Bureau,
Jerusalem, Israel, as USG
authorizations for the existing Israeli / Palestinian Peace Programme Funding
and Development Projects, in the Suisse Courtís possession and / or
concealment.
It is interesting to note that the very day the Israeli Government sends me a
coded message on 16 November 1993; I am immediately taken by Suisse
gunpoint and physical body restraints to Swiss Air for immediate
extradition departure to New York, yet another U. S. Federal and
International violation in your court records.
JUST HOW MANY INNOCENT HUMAN LIVES MUST BE SACRIFICED FOR THE PERSONAL,
MONETARY AND POLITICAL GAINS AND INTERNATIONAL POWER PLAYS AGAINST GLOBAL
HUMANITY WITH TOTAL FREEDOM AND LIBERTY BY
5/20
INTERNATIONAL BIRTHRIGHT. YOUR SUISSE COURTíS INTEGRITY TO MEET THE
PROVOCATEURS ìHEAD ONî IS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH EQUALITY AND
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE BASED ON SEEKING THE WHOLE TRUTH NOWÖ.
The United States Internal Revenue Service addresses me for Corporate
Income Tax purposes, as ìAttn: Ambassador L Wantaî no legitimate Court
has ever lawfully revoked my Diplomatic status, nor as the Somali Democratic
Government ñ Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
In my personal case ñ I was unlawfully arrested for failure to pay Wisconsin
ìnon-residency taxesî while working as the Ambassador to Switzerland and
Chairman-designate to the Somali Central Bank, while in the Sovereign Country
of Switzerland, unlawfully detained in a Suisse dungeon ñ for 134 days
without a U.S. Constitutional îSPEEDY TRIALî, forcibly drugged which
developed into a serious HEART condition diagnosed as RBBB ñ Right Bundle
Branch (Electrical) Block, as the State of Wisconsin refuses to release
certain illegally seized USDollar corporate funds to obtain a very needed
Pacemaker and imprisoned me to unlawfully pay under state extortion and
intimidation with CIA/Corporate funding for the third time, a State of
Wisconsin civil tax assessment for 1982 and non-residency year of 1988, [see
Original Certificate of Divorce or Annulment, Court Case No. 95FA445,
adjudicating that my last day of legal residence in the Sovereign State of
Wisconsin was prior to July, 1988] - as the alleged state civil tax
assessments were legally paid and settled in full satisfaction TWICE in 1992
for USDollar 14,129.00 each, as a Central Intelligence Agency/Corporate
nuisance tax assessment, resulting I personally believe in the Murder of
White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster and Freddie Woodruff, a CIA Case
Officer involved with AmeriTrust and New Republic/USA Financial Group,
Gessellschaft Ltd, Wien, Austria and with full working knowledge of certain
Intel operations/surveillance funded by AmeriTrust, Aneko Credit Pte Limited,
Asian-Europa Development Group, Ltd, and other USCA 18 / Sec 6 USG operations:
USG sanctioned interference in the ìDomestic Affairsî of the former
Soviet
Union (USSR) ruble (SUR) currency, Gold currency certificates and delivery
of 2,000 metric tonnes of Soviet gold bullion via USSR Central Bank directly
to New Republic/USA Financial Group Ltd Ges.m.b.H. for smelting to 12.5 kgs
Gold bars in order to:-
De-stabilize the USSR Military Establishment, KGB/Stasi operations
and the Soviet Union economy, in favour of Boris Yeltsin Groupe,
Control and identify the Soviet Union FUSION BOMB development,
6/20
3. AFGHAN / USSR traffic of General Dynamics ìSurface to Airî
Stinger Missiles with Soviet / CIA International sales and delivery
activities, via our USGovn targets John Taylor and Scott Partridge,
USG sanctioned Intel findings by New Republic/USA (Austria) of
Iraqi purchases and deliveries of USSR/Bulgaria RED MERCURY (RM 2020)
through T. A. Trace Lab Analysis of Morges, Switzerland
coordinated by Suisse Dr. John Lutz, et al; and in conjunction with
USSR Envoy Millie Ferrus of Lausanne, Switzerland, resulting in Suisse
Cooperation and funding AGAINST THE AMERICAN / FOREIGN COALITION involved
in the Iraq / Kuwait conflict, inter alia,
Meccanotechnia Industries (Singapore) of Fiat-Valsella ( Italia ) military
Production of LANDMINES, delivered to the Iraqi Military for defense against
the American Coalition Armed Forces, as discovered by INTEL operations of
Aneko Credit Pte Limited (Singapore)/USCA18 / 6 ops.,
USG Intel.ops discovering ìBLUE MOONî operation, under Blue
Moon Bags of Thailand and approval for our INTEL.ops to target for
Full field investigation [ but later to learn that their drug
operation was
Known and protected by U. S. Customs Attache assigned to U.S.
Embassy in the Republic of Singapore ñ working in association with
our previous U. S Treasury / U. S. Customs Internal Affairs target
within the Little Rock / Mena Night Flight operations] ñ as to
illegal distribution of controlled substances of Heroin and Cocaine,
etc. VIA Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapura railway operations
with Blue Moon operatives / mules; for covert international delivery
to Europa / North American distribution. This INTEL.ops was
coordinated by U. S. Treasury Department INTEL Field Operatives ñ
a. Frank B Ingram, SA32NV;
b. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS;
c. Lee E Wanta, Falconbird / Stillpoint
with assistance of Sector V Operations and Internal
Affairs under
S - 31 - IANO USGovernment authority and control,
Unlawful U. S. Treasury Certificate traffic investigation in South East
Asia, coordinated by SA233MS and SA32NV, with U. S. Secret Service Agents Bob
Twohig and Rick Zainos, et al - in Bangkok, Thailand,
USG Intel.ops coordinated by New Republic/USA (Austria) expose of
Italia/Soviet Mafiosa, thwarted by Austrian/Singapura INTEL.ops, as
listed in Thieves World, Simon & Schuster (1994) demonstrating the
7/20
AmeriTrust/New Republic surveillance operations to force out known
crime enterprises with our working association with a Italia Chief Judge
listed in book, as well as ìillegal money laundering operationsî of
COMEXPO s.r.l. Import-Export Consulting & Promotion ñ situated in Verona,
Italia and under our authorized U.S. Treasury / Customs case number
w/exhibits readily available.. We have never laundered any money, since
we are authorized to receive ten (10%) percent of any and all USGovernment
lawful seizures under our United States Agreements, as we are
definitely not the alleged criminals as falsely stated by unknown State
and Suisse provocateurs in some shadow, without truthful facts and
Counter-Intelligence knowledge and related USG responsibilities; my
partner and brother Kok Howe Kwong, and my associates, like Freddie
Woodruff, Francois de Grosseurve and Vince Foster died strangely for
their personal belief in our Great Nation, by BETRAYAL of others
with falsehoods and malice,
USG ìSecurity Code ñ NEW REPUBLICî of USCA 18 / 6 Jackson,
Mississippi, INTEL.ops legally organized as New Republic / USA
Financial Group, Ltd. to coordinate U. S. Vice President George
Herbert Walker Bush implementation of:-
Contra funding v Boland Amendment, with canal barge deliveries;
POM (Arkansas) sub-assemblies and covert production and related
parts to COLAS (Honduras) final assembly operations; Arkansas
Development Finance Authority (ADFA) with Chairman Bob Nash
under Operation: DEALROOM with Bank of China FOREX of
Japanese Yen and USDollars with Arkansas Pension Funding to the
Peopleís Republic of China (PRC.ops), with US Attorney General
Bill Barr / CIA.ops / DOD.ops (see field reports of RAC Wm Lecates
and Frank B Ingram (Sector 5), as copied to USSS Director John Magaw
and SAC Glen Speedy, et al, ; including the Browning Arms Sale and
Delivery of certain weapons through Arab Associates and Ronald Arab,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada to the Panama Groupe protected by
then Vice President Bush, per USGovernment STING operation headed and
coordinated by USG INTEL operative Leo Wanta and SA32NV - Frank B Ingram
via Corpus Christi U. S. Customs Operations, under USGovn Case numbers
relative to Boland Amendment and other U. S. Federal arms and smuggling
violations; ref: USGovn case numbers in Wanta/Ingram/Lecates USGovernment
authorized Field reports, and U. S. Federal Court records in Corpus
Christi, Texas Region.
MX Mobile Missile mobilization / deployment activities of New
Republic/USA (Mississippi.ops) to purchase the Santa Fe / Southern
8/20
Pacific Railroad in U. S. Bankruptcy proceedings with BLACK.ops/
New Republic/USA funding as authorized ( documents available )..
New Republic/USA purchase of USSR Mig 29 FULCRUM
maintenance manuals for U. S. Air Force OSI operations, like a true
copy, certainly qualified this writer as an American operative once
again, as well as the Soviet HIND aircraft recovery operations,
Aneko Credit Pte Ltd covert investigation of Motorola SECTEL
Sales and delivery to Iran Security Operations via Singapura/Malaysia,
Yongbyon, North Korea ìnuclear chipî manufacturing, developed by
Singapore Technologies for sister plants in North Korea & Singapura,
as financed by VIOLA TRADING LIMITED, Andras Szasz and
George Soros Groupe of Sovereign House, Station Road, St John, Isle
of Man ñ Registration No. 41992, Isle of Man, as well as diesel oil and
other procurement of previously EMBARGOED commodities.
Kuwait Dinar FOREX as sanctioned by USGovernment programmes
Utilizing the INSLAW, Inc. PROMIS software, inter alia, and much
much more for absolute proof that, We, AmeriTrust and our
corporate officers are real victims of Criminal Conspiracy by others,
enjoying their current freedom at our expense and displeasure, but
certainly for their PERSONAL GAIN and Abuse / Misuse of Power
without merit,
Recovery of stolen / cancelled Chase Manhattan Bank and Citibank Bank
Guarantees by unknown persons being negotiated within the
Suisse Banking Community, and AmeriTrust finderís fee for recovery
of said Bank Instruments and lawful prosecution of the alleged criminal
perpetrators under USGovernment Security code : Chaselet.
Based on my diplomatic situation, I was kidnapped in
Switzerland and taken to New York at gunpoint, and appeared in the United
States District Court, Eastern District of New York, USA, Docket No.
93-M-2072; whereas the Court dismissed any and all unlawful / alleged
complaints of the State of Wisconsin, based on USGovernment Motion as
to Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta ñ whereas the State of Wisconsin ñ Department
of Revenue DEFIED said U. S. Federal Order and
had me re-arrested in New York City with only my Diplomatic
Entry / VISA without any valid ARREST WARRANT, for continuous REFUSAL to
pay a WISCONSIN CIVIL TAX ASSESSMENT of a STATE NON-RESIDENT.
( see enclosed New York exhibits for verification of
diplomatic status)
However, the State of New York unlawfully held me
incognito within their Department of Corrections, and listed
immediately as an AMBASSADOR
after United States Secret Service notification and confirmation.
9/20
[ see United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No.
97-3888, USA v Elton Howard Silkman, filed September 16, 1998]
The State of Wisconsin clearly violated 26 U.S.C. , Sec 7201 as to illegally
extraditing Ambassador Wanta, to his ìnon-residentî State of Wisconsin, USA ñ
since June 30, 1988 - for alleged civil state tax deficiencies for 1982 and
1988, per the defective Arrest Warrant served in Switzerland by the U.S.
State Department Vice Consul Carlos Medina, Berne, contrary to the Suisse/USA
Treaty provisions, among other things, which include:-
Excluded court evidence in favour of Ambassador Wanta
Excluded evidence of USGovernment liability
Excluded proof that a legitimate tax deficiency lawfully existed
No exclusive proof that a real tax crime ever existed
Please note : An American taxpayer-defendant has a right to establish as a
defense that he owed no tax in addition to what he had paid, (see
United States v Moody, 339 F.2d 161, 162 (6th Cir. 1964).
Quote ñ The government has no authority for its startling contention that an
IRS assessment is conclusive proof in a criminal trial that taxes were in
fact owing.
As the Supreme Court said in United States Martin Linen Supply Co., 430 U.S.
564, 572-733 1977), the juryís overriding responsibility is to stand
between the accused and a potentially arbitrary or abusive government that is
in command of the criminal sanction. For this reason, a trial judge is
prohibited from entering a judgment of conviction or directing a jury to
come forward with such a verdict,
regardless of how overwhelming the evidence may point in that direction.
This conclusion is consistent with United States v England, where the
government conceded that proof of a valid assessment was essential to its
evasion case, an he court held it was in error to instruct the jury the
assessment was valid as a matter of law. 347 F. 2d at 430. England was
followed in United States v Goetz, 746 F. 2d 705, 708-10 (11th Cir. 1984).
[The Courtís] Our conclusion is also consistent with decisions that the
taxpayer may defend a charge of willfully evading the assessment of taxes by
proving there was no tax due and owing, for example, by evidence of
unclaimed deductions and expenses. See, e.. Clark v United States, 211 F 2d
100, 13 (8th Cir. 1954), ÖÖ But conclusive presumptions are invalid in
criminal cases because they ìconflict with the overriding presumption of
innocence with which extends to every element of the crime, and would invade
10/20
the factfinding function which in a criminal case the law assigns solely to
the jury.î
Sandstrom v Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 523 (1979) Ö. It is not rational to make
the assessment conclusive proof f the deficiency, particularly because in the
absence of a tax return an assessment is based upon a ìsubstituteî return
prepared by the IRS without the benefit of factual input from the taxpayer.
For the foregoing reasons, [the court] we conclude that one accused of tax
evasion must have the opportunity to prove, however unlikely the proposition
may be, that an administratively final tax assessment does not accurately
reflect the existence of a tax deficiency. Therefore, [defendant] is entitled
to a new trial at which he may introduce evidence relevant to whether there
was in fact a tax deficiency in one or more of the tax years in question.
However, [the court] we agree with cases holding that, while an assessment
may be used to prove a tax deficiency in a payment evasion case, an
assessment is nota necessary element of a payment evasion charge. See Hogan,
861 F. 2d at 315-16; Dack, 47 F 2d at 1174, Voorhies, 658 F 2d at 714-15.
Therefore, it can be readily established that the Suisse Judicial authorities
were lawlessly mislead by the Suisse, United States and State of
Wisconsin provocateurs to unconstitutionally deny me, my personal freedom
and liberty by American Birthright, as well as the Vienna Convention
Articles, inter alia.
Please note: The State of Wisconsin of the United States of America admits
they ìuttered/alteredî the civil NON-RESIDENCY state tax returns in favor of
the Department of Revenue, in order to seek the fraudulent state arrest
warrant by illegally manipulating the Suisse Federation, Suisse Surete and
their Judicial System, U.S. State Department and the U.S. Federal Bureau of
Investigation, et al; contrary to U.S.C.A. Title 18,
Section 4 ñ Misprision of Felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by
a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make
known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority
under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not
more than three years, or both. (June 25, 1948, c. 645, 62 Stat 684)
Elements of offense ñ Generally
Ö. are concealment of something, such as suppression of the
evidence or other
positive act, and failure to disclose (Neal v U. S., cc A Minn,
1939, 102F 2d 643)
Knowledge of commission of felony
Ö. it is immaterial whether government did or did not know of crime or who
the perpetrator was ( Lacey v U. S. C. A. Cal 1966, 356F 2d 07, certiorari
denied 87 Sct 234, 385 US 922, 172 Ed 2d145)
11/20
Concealment
Ö.. such as suppression of evidence, harboring a criminal, intimidation of
witnesses, or other positive act designed to conceal from authorities
commission of the felony. (Bratton V USCCA Okl, 1934, 73 2d 795)
Indictment or Information
Indictment alleging that specified person committed offense cognizable by
courts of United States, that defendant had knowledge of actual commission
of such offense, that defendant willfully concealed crime, and that
defendant did not as soon as possible make known commission of crime to
authorities was sufficient to charge offense of misprision of a felony
notwithstanding failure to allege evidentiary details of concealment. (US v
Sullivan, DC Okl 1968, 284 Supp 574)
Venue
Ö.. was place where report of felony should have been made (Bratton v USCCA
Okl, 1934, 73 F 2d 795)
Evidence
Ö. Evidence in prosecution for misprision of a felony must establish
affirmative act of concealment, and mere silence without some affirmative act
is insufficient to authorize conviction. (US v Sullivan, DC Okl 1968, 284 F
Supp 579)
Please note : The necessary evidence is now established by this current
Suisse Court Action for the State of Wisconsin ñ Department of Revenue
suggested to the Suisse authorities that the STATE is willing to disburse
certain corporate funds to the Suisse counterparts for their participation in
this absolute Fraud on the U. S. Federal Courts, The Suisse Courts and
Wisconsin non-jurisdictional subject matter courts of record, among other
lawless activities by others, as demonstrated by the U. S. Federal Bureau of
Investigation DISCLAIMERS of their official role at the behest of the State
of Wisconsin ñ to falsely accuse this American citizen and International
Diplomat in the court records In Wisconsin,
as well as the Suisse and United States District Courts, and Media
Journalists.
Section 10 ñ Interstate Commerce and Foreign Commerce defined
Section 11 ñ Foreign Government defined
My lawless Suisse Extradition is in direct violation of my issued Somali
Diplomatic Credentials which have not been revoked by any Government,
among other things.
The term ì FOREIGN GOVERNMENTî, as used in this title, includes any
government, faction, or body of insurgents within a country with which the
United States is at peace, irrespective of recognition by the United States.
(June25, 1948, c 645, 63 Stat 686)
12/20
Therefore, the sudden and lawless notice of the State of Wisconsin
and the Suisse Federation to revoke my Diplomatic Status and Diplomatic
Passports No. 04362 and 12535 has no LEGAL STANDING, as a matter of law ñ
and I respectfully Demand the immediate return of the illegally seized
Diplomatic Passports and related documentation forthwith, as well as all
other USGovernment and Corporate documents seized under a false color of law..
Section 35 - Imparting or conveying false information
Whoever imparts or conveys or cause to be imparted or conveyed false
information, knowing the information to be false, concerning an attempt or
alleged attempt being made, to do any act which would be a crime prohibited
by this chapterÖ..
Whoever willfully and maliciously, or with reckless disregard for the safety
of human life, imparts or conveys or causes to be imparted or conveyed false
information, knowing the information to be false, concerning an attempt or
alleged attempt being made or to be made to do any act which would be a crime
prohibited.. ( Added July 14, 156, c 595, Sec 1, 70 Stat 540, and amended Oct
3, 1961, Pub L. 87-338, 75 Stat 75; July 7, 1965, Pub. L 89-64, 79 Stat
210 )
Constitutionality
This section making criminal imparting of information known to be false
concerning attempt or alleged attempt to do act which would be crime
prohibited by this chapter was not unconstitutionally vague where it clearly
applies to facts of facts of particular case. (US v Rutherford, CA,NY, 1964,
332 F2d 444, certiorari denied 84 Sct 1922, 377 US 994, 12 L Ed 2d1046)
Statements within Section
Ficticious as well as false reports were intended to be covered by this
section.
(U. S. v Allen, C. A. Conn, 1963, 317 F 2d 777)
3. Sufficiency
Evidence sustained conviction for violation of this section proscribing,
imparting or conveying false information. (US v Rutherford, CA NY 1964, 332
F 2d 444, certiorari denied 845 ct 1922, 377 US 994, 12 L Ed 2d 1046)
Section 241 ñ Conspiracy against rights of citizens
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate
any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege
secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of
his having so exercised the same;
Constitutionality
This section pertaining to conspiracy against rights of citizens encompasses
due process and equal protection clauses of USCA Const Amend 14 and is not
13/20 unconstitutional vague. (US v Guest, Ga, 1966, 86 Sct 1170, 383 US
745, 16 L Ed 2d 239)
CONGRESS HAS THE POWER TO PROTECT THE CITIZEN IN THE EXERCISE OF RIGHTS
CONFERRED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
(Ex parte Yarborough, Ga 1884, 4 Sct 152, 110 US 651, 28 L Ed 274)
The word ìconspireî, as found in this section, making conspiracy against the
rights of citizens a crime, is equivalent to the word îwillfullyî, and thus
this section is not unconstitutional for being vague or failing to state as
ascertainable
standard of guilt, nor is an indictment thereunder charging that persons did
conspire for such purpose defective, on theory that it does not allege an
intent to commit offense. Id.
Rationale behind creation of crime of conspiracy to violate State and Federal
laws was belief by Congress that mere agreement among members of persons to
commit an offense was itself a danger to society demanding classification of
a crime, and although an overt act is necessary for conviction, it is not
necessary to prove that conspiracy was successful. (U. S. v Bonanno, DC NY
1960, 180 F Supp 71)
Title 18, United States Code ñ Section 1201 (Chapter 55) ñ Kidnapping
Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or
carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except
in the case of a minor by the parent thereof, when:
the person is willfully transported in interstate or foreign commerce;
any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and
territorial jurisdiction of the United States;
any such act against the person is done within the special aircraft
jurisdiction of the United States as defined in Section 101 (36) of the
Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended ( 49 USC 1301 (36)); or
the person is a foreign official, an internationally protected person, or
an official guest as those terms are defined in section 1116 (b) of this
title, shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
With respect to subsection (a) (1), above, the failure to release the victim
within twenty-four hours after he shall have been unlawfully seized,
confined,
inveigled, decoyed, kidnapped, abducted, or carried away shall create a
rebuttable presumption that such person has been transported in
interstate or
foreign commerce.
If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more such
persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each
shall be
punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
14/20
Whoever attempts to violate subsection (a) (4) shall be punished by
imprisonment for not more than twenty years,
If the victim of an offense under subsection (a) is an internationally
protected
Person, the United States may exercise jurisdiction over the offense if the
alleged offender is present within the United States, irrespective of the
place where the offense was committed or the nationality of the victim or the
alleged offender. [ See Federal Aviation Act of 1958 as to Gunpoint
Extradition on Swiss Air Commercial aircraft in United States air/marine
territory. ]
Common Law ñ At common law, ìkidnapî meant to take any act to carry
a person by force and against his will.
Constitutionality - Terms ìkidnapî and ìholds for ransom or rewardî or
otherwise in this section proscribing kidnapping of a
foreign official or
internationally protected persons, did not render
this section
unconstitutionally vague.
This section making interstate kidnapping a crime f victim
is held for ransom
or reward ì or otherwiseî was intended to reach abductions
not motivated by
ransom or reward and its provisions not unconstitutionally
vagueÖ..
situations lacking the involuntariness of seizure and
detention which is the
essence of the crime of kidnappingÖ
Word ìkidnapî has a technical meaning, is derived from the common law, and
must be interpreted in light of its technical meaning at common law, and,
both under the common law and under this section, unless clearly modified
means to take and carry away any person by unlawful force or by fraud and
against his will.
This title/section adequately expressed intention of Congress to prevent
transportation in interstate or foreign commerce of persons who were
unlawfully restrained in order that captor might secure some benefit to
himself.
Ö. was to extend federal jurisdiction under such former section to persons
who have been kidnapped and held, not only for reward, but for any other
reason,
Ö. was designed to punish one guilty of the transportation of a kidnapped
person in interstate commerce where the kidnapping was done for ransom or
otherwise.
OBJECT OF THIS SECTION AND SECTION 1202 OF THIS TITLE PROHIBITING
KIDNAPPING IS TO SECURE CITIZENíS PERSONAL LIBERTY AND TO SECURE TO THEM THE
ASSISTANCE OF THE LAW NECESSARY TO RELEASE THEM FROM UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT.
15/20
Elements of offense - Generally
To prove guilt under this section, prosecution must establish transportation
in interstate commerce of an unconsenting person who was held for ransom or
reward or otherwise, such acts being done knowingly and willfully.
Elements to be established in Federal Kidnapping charge are: (1) the
transportation in interstate commerce, (2) of an unconsented person who is
(3) held for ransom or reward, or otherwise and (4) doing such acts knowingly
and willfully.
This section prohibits transportation in interstate commerce of persons who
were being unlawfully restrained in order that captor might secure some
benefit to himself.
While ìkidnappingî at common law means to forcibly abduct a person and to
carry him from one state into another state, term involves element of seizing
victim by force or fraud and against his will.
Purpose of kidnapping need not be for reward or pecuniary gain.
(42) A state may not lawfully try, convict and punish person brought within
its territorial confines by force and violence exercised by its officers in
violation of
this section. (Collins v Frisbie, C. A., Mich 1951)
ÖÖ. was not so uncertain that those accused thereunder would not know that
the charges constituted an offense. (US v Wilson, DC Mo 1947, 72 F Supp 812,
affirmed 176 F 2d 184, certiorari denied 70 Sct 145, 2 mems, 338 US 870, 94
L Ed 533)
See, CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, USCA 42, SECTION 1981
See, ARTICLE III OF U. S. CONTITUTION
See, VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS (1961)
See, 1900 USA/SUISSE FEDERAL EXTRADICTION TREATY;
ARTICLES I THROUGH XIV
See, TITLE 18, USCA SECTION 1073 AS TO STATE OF WISCONSIN
FEDERAL VIOLATIONS AND THEIR OUTRIGHT PERJURY
See, TITLE 28 ( HOBBS ANTI-RACKETEERING ACT)
16/20
Per Wisconsin Statutes :-
s. 976.03, Note 21 ñ Foreign Countries
International extradition was based on treaties only, and thus any offense
which was not made extraditable by treaty between the nations involved was
not an extraditable offense. (14 Op.Atty.Gen 189 (1925))
The matter of extradition {of actual State of Wisconsin Non-residents} of
fugitives from {Wisconsin non-jurisdictional subject matter} justice who have
taken refuge in a foreign country is governed wholly by treaties between the
United States and such country. ( 3 Op.Atty.Gen 830 (1914))
s. 976.03, Note 25 ñ Fugitive from Justice ñ In general
Person should be fugitive from justice in order to be extradited. (10
Op.Atty.Gen 831 (1921)) See U. S. Federal Court Dismissal of fraudulently
obtained Fugitive Warrant, manipulated and issued under State of Wisconsin
as authorized by the future U. S. Presidential Candidate - Wisconsin
Governor Tommy Thompson, Subterfuge and Perjury.
Section 242 - Deprivation of rights under Color of Law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom,
willfully subjects any inhabitant of any state, territory or District to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by
the Constitution or Laws of the United States.
Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense of to defraud United States
Extortion
An agreement between state law enforcement officers and others to extort
money from inhabitants of the United States by causing their arrest and
imprisonment, without justification by such officers, and under color of
state law, constituted a ìCONSPIRACYî to commit an offense against the
United States in violation of this section of which Federal District Court
has jurisdiction. (Culp v USCA Ark 1942, 131 F 2 d 93).
As the American Populace fully aware of continuing ìmisconductî in State and
Federal Government ñ as well as Foreign Nations, the following must apply:-
Title 18, United States Code ñ Section 1116 Murder or manslaughter of
foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons.
As noted above, the State of Wisconsin refused this writer Medical Care for
my Heart* condition, that they created under the color of law and perjury,
and continuing to seize/freeze corporate and
17/20
personal assets to financially refuse medical surgery options for the
immediate hospitalization for surgical installation of the needed PACEMAKER.
Whoever kills or attempts to kill a foreign official, official guest, or
internationally protected person shall be punished as provided under section
1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title, and any such person who is guilty
of
attempted murder shall be punished for not more than twenty years.
For the purposes of this section:
ìForeign governmentî means the government of a foreign country,
irrespective of recognition by the United States.
ìForeign officialî means ñ
A Chief of State or the political equivalent, President, Vice President,
Prime Minister, Ambassador, Foreign Minister, or other officer of
Cabinet rank or above of a foreign government or the chief executive
officer of an international organization, or any person who has
previously served in such capacity, and any member of his family,
while in the United States; and,
ì Internationally protected personî means-
A Chief of State or the political equivalent, head of government, or Foreign
Minister whenever such person is in a country other than his own and any
member of his family accompanying him; or
Any other representative, officer, employee, or agent of the USG, a foreign
government, or international organization who at the time and place concerned
is entitled pursuant to international law to special protection against
attack upon his person, freedom, or dignity, and any member of his family
then forming part of his household.
If the victim of an offense under subsection (a) is an internationally
protected person, the United States may exercise jurisdiction over the
offense if the alleged offender is present within the United States,
irrespective of the place where the offense was committed or the nationality
of the victim or the alleged offender.
In the course of enforcement of this section and any other sections
prohibiting a conspiracy or attempt to violate this section, the Attorney
General may request assistance from any Federal, State, or local agency,
including the Army, Navy, and Air Force, any statute, rule, or regulation to
the contrary notwithstanding.
Purpose ñ Intention of this section was to implement fulfillment of
obligations
of United States under two treaties, and to do so completely.
4. Conspiracy ñ In prosecution for conspiracy to seize and confine a foreign
official, government was not required to prove either that all the
potential
victims were foreign officials or that defendants had the specific
intention of
seizing foreign officials.
18/20
5. NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIALS
Although regulation requires the Chief of Protocol of the State
Department
to maintain roster of names of persons who have been duly notified to
the
United States as officers or employees of foreign governments, the
maintenance of such roster is not a condition precedent to effective
notification of foreign official to the United States, for purposes of
this section.
As before your good offices is authorized to DEBIT our Suisse Corporate
Account No. 70849 at Banque SCS Alliance, Geneve, Switzerland for Suisse
francs 10,000 and CREDIT per original bank instructions, Deputy White House
Counsel Vincent Foster, Jr. fiduciary account at Credit Suisse Banque for
the amount of USDollars 125,000.00, under Ms Elaine Guiraud fiduciary
signatory control on behalf of the Suisse controlled ñ FGI Fiduciarie-conseil
operations, Lausanne.
Please prepare the suggested proxy to commence Legal Action against the
Canton of Vaud, Switzerand. Please notify the Police de Surete of the
unreturned 6í940
franc suisses, as well as other personal belongings and corporate/USGovernment
documentation.
All of my USGovernment actions, including the U.S.S.R. ruble currency affair
were carried out with the full knowledge of my superiors. I personally do
not intend to be fraudulently used as a Human Sacrifice to deny and cover-up
the working knowledge and shared responsibility of others. Now without any
doubt, we have a conscious USGovernment policy of ignoring reality.
The American Public needs to learn what is really happening in the United
States and the Sovereign State of Wisconsin, so that Civil Tax Laws can be
accountable to a large and informed public, and not just generated lawlessly
by delusional tax agents, whose judgments are colored by their personal
needs and biases, under the color of law. To forcibly DRUG and IMPRISON me
to collect unknown corporate and personal non-residency income taxes is
grossly CRIMINAL, as well as a direct violation of my United States
Constitutional, Civil and Diplomatic Rights.
Once upon a time, ì a decision which has long been regarded as the special
province of the Executive Branchî - charged by the U. S. Constitution to
ì TAKE CARE THAT THE LAWS BE FAITHFLLY EXECUTED.î
19/20
[U. S. Const., Art II, Sec 3, Id at 832, 105 S ct at 1656. See also
Powell v Katzenbach, 359 F 2d 234 (1965) cert denied 384 U. S. 906, 86 S
ct 1341,
16 L Ed 2d 359 (1966)]
The overall cost of closing your eyes to the State of Wisconsinís Corruption
and Tax Conspiracy by acts of kidnapping/abduction on foreign sovereign soil
is beyond American traditions of Due Process and Equal Protection under our
United States Constitution, certainly exposing the Clinton Administration
complicity and open endorsement.
I was led to believe that at one time, our United States of America
President William Jefferson Clinton had both the moral standing and the
Presidential
means to ì back upî our U. S. Constitution, our Civil Rights, and Guarded
Privileges, under his personal World Leadership, based on our USG
sanctioned ì De-stabilization of the Evil Empire.î
May God save our Great Nation from inner destruction and Misuse and Abuse
of Power, contrary to our Democratic Rule of Law and the U. S. Constitution.
Respectfully yours,
AmeriTrust Corporation, Inc.
By: _______________________________________________
Leo Emil Wanta, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
LEW:wien.ops/M418.end
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
