hi,
I am trying to compile libcurl.so by VC8 with libssh2 and openssl, in order to
support both SFTP and HTTPS.
My libcurl version is 7.21.3 . When I look at the src/lib/Makfile.vc8, I find
there is only option in CFG about ZLIB and SSL, but no LIBSSH2 found.
So I search the web, and
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Konstantin Miller wrote:
Do you mean that although an explicit call to curl_global_init is not thread
safe, an implicit call from, e.g., curl_easy_init is still thread safe? So
that in a multi-threaded process I would not want to explicitely call
curl_global_init but
Salisbury, Mark mark.salisb...@hp.com wrote:
[...] I think I've incorporated all suggestions. These patches
should be a little easier to read; after rebasing some of the
things I was doing have been done already.
I've just pushed the 0001-* one with some adjustments. Most notably
I've
On 6/8/2012 4:57 PM, Steve Holme wrote:
Hiya,
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
Alternatively if Daniel does mind us adding new SMTP specific error
codes we could add CURLE_SMTP_MAIL_ERROR and CURLE_SMTP_RCPT_ERROR
and change the data failed to be CURLE_SEND_ERROR.
Did we come to
Yang Tse yangs...@gmail.com wrote:
This commit alone doesn't provide yet all the WinCE stuff but should
nicely prepare code base for it while hopefully not breaking anything.
Yep, broken. Follow-up patch pushed.
--
-=[Yang]=-
Hi Dan,
Alternatively if Daniel does mind us adding new SMTP
specific error codes we could add
CURLE_SMTP_MAIL_ERROR and
CURLE_SMTP_RCPT_ERROR and change the data failed
to be CURLE_SEND_ERROR.
Did we come to any sort of consensus about what the
implementation should look like?
I
If you're referring to the if(smtpcode/100 != 2) then I would agree that
it is a broad net to catch a small fish, however, it is more efficient to do
this than have various if/else statements or a switch statement for the
possible error codes that might come back from the server. At the end of
Hi Dan,
If the response from the server is guaranteed to be 550 then we could
do if(smtpcode != 550) but I'm not sure if that is the case / nor was
Daniel when he originally wrote the function.
Since most of the code is broken down into the specific parts, wouldn't
it be fairly
