On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Rod Widdowson wrote:
Concerning the patch I did not review it however what was ultimately
proposed in 1201 [1] I think seems to make a lot of sense.
Whilst I agree that it seems to make sense, I'm not sure if I'm embarrassed
or saddened that this PR wasn't on my horizon
Ray,
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
TLDR; Some people are listening, tell me what to do next.
> . I wouldn't expect to hear anything from 99% of them
> unless it stops working, because that's usually the way it goes
I deleted my response to that - it didn't say anything you won't
On 1/30/2017 5:18 AM, Rod Widdowson wrote:
> To summarise:
>
> The proposal is to move several internal parameterizations to do with the
> names and sources of various LIBS onto the command line and document them -
> making their use "supported" in some way. This will be backwards compatible
>
