On 6/14/19, 12:12 AM, "Daniel Stenberg" wrote:
I noticed you also closed it again, but the reasoning surprised me.
- you withdrew it after you noticed the speedcheck call in the TOOFAST
state,
but in your use case surely your transfer is never in TOOFAST?
-
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Magdy, Marco wrote:
I've created a PR [2] that fixes the problem and passes the unit tests.
I noticed you also closed it again, but the reasoning surprised me.
- you withdrew it after you noticed the speedcheck call in the TOOFAST state,
but in your use case surely
