On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Isaac Boukris <ibouk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Pierre Brico <pierre.br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I see what you mean. You use the curl_multi API to wrap an easy
> handle
> > to avoid s
com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Pierre Brico wrote:
> >
> >> So my question is: is it possible to link one connection to one CURL
> >> handle (no pool usage)?
> >
wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Pierre Brico wrote:
>
> each virtual users has its own CURL handle. When the user wants to
>> communicate with the server, it uses the CURL handle. But it seems that
>> when starting a transfer, libcurl gets a connection from a pool, execute
>
Hello,
I'm currently writing a injector tool to perform benchmark on web
application. This tool is based on libcurl and libevent.
This tool creates a curl_easy handle per virtual user. The multi interface
is then used in conjunction with the libevent library to execute all
transfers.
I have
Hi Daniel and Ray,
Thanks for your reply and suggestions.
I understand why you don't want to implement such kind of feature in
libcurl but I don't like the proposed solutions:
Ray's one: customized modifications in libcurl in not a good idea
Daniel's one: the processing to generate the Cookies
Hello,
I've a question about the usage of libcurl with Secure Flag on Cookie.
I'm writing a injector tool to perform benchmark on web application. This
tool is based on libcurl and libevent.
The web application isn't exposed directly to the web but uses a F5 ASM for
security purposes. This F5
Hello,
Thanks to Yang who has fixed my first issue (I tested it under Windows and
it works). However, the behavior is different of what I was waiting for.
Indeed, I though the timeout was computed between two calls of the
write_callback function and not computed by subtracting current time from
