Re: Is it normal to the progress callback be called once again after returning non-zero value?

2014-06-14 Thread Ray Satiro
On 6/13/2014 5:45 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Ray Satiro wrote: - if(Curl_pgrsDone(conn) !result) + if((status != CURLE_ABORTED_BY_CALLBACK) Curl_pgrsDone(conn) !result) result = CURLE_ABORTED_BY_CALLBACK; Oops. I wanted that to instead be: -

[Survey] What people want us to do next

2014-06-14 Thread Daniel Stenberg
Hi I've been going through the answers people filled in to the last question in the survey: What bug/feature would you like us to work on next? We got a lot of thankyous in there and also some ramblings that really didn't contain any suggestions. I've taken the liberty of filtering out some

Re: the survey summary

2014-06-14 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Daniel Stenberg wrote: http://curl.haxx.se/docs/survey/survey2014.html One of the most surprising results (to me) is that docs was voted the most worst area in the project with a big margin. (Admittedly twice as many also voted it as one of the best areas). I'd like

Re: Is it normal to the progress callback be called once again after returning non-zero value?

2014-06-14 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Ray Satiro wrote: think we should call the progress callback again. Basically that could lead to the similar problem: return an error from another callback and yet you get the progress callback called again. Ok that works on the samples. Generally speaking though if a

Re: [Survey] What people want us to do next

2014-06-14 Thread Marc Hoersken
Daniel, thanks for gathering the feedback! On 14.06.2014 23:16, Daniel Stenberg wrote: up-to-date windows binaries by knauf If I would know which type of Windows builds are the most frequently requested ones, I could setup my Windows testing buildbots [1] to produce curl and libcurl binaries

Re: weak randomness with some TLS backends

2014-06-14 Thread Marc Hoersken
On 04.06.2014 14:55, Pierre Joye wrote: I think it is time to drop windows 2000. Maybe even xp at some point. But this function is available for xp, so it is not a issue at this point. I also suggest dropping support for Windows 2000 and Windows XP before Service Pack 3 if we want to have

Re: [Survey] What people want us to do next

2014-06-14 Thread Corey Feldman-Haim
rip out all openSSL replace with libreSSL On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Marc Hoersken i...@marc-hoersken.de wrote: Daniel, thanks for gathering the feedback! On 14.06.2014 23:16, Daniel Stenberg wrote: up-to-date windows binaries by knauf If I would know which type of Windows builds

Re: [Survey] What people want us to do next

2014-06-14 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Corey Feldman-Haim wrote: rip out all openSSL replace with libreSSL They're supposedly API compatible so what exactly are you suggesting we do? AFAIK, libressl is only for OpenBSD still too, or am I wrong? -- / daniel.haxx.se

Re: weak randomness with some TLS backends

2014-06-14 Thread Marc Hoersken
On 14.06.2014 23:56, Marc Hoersken wrote: An alternative to loading Advapi32.dll dymically using LoadLibrary could be to statically link with Advapi32.lib which takes care of it. This could also be an approach for other areas in libcurl which do currently use LoadLibrary, for example:

Re: Test 584 failures on FreeBSD after 5b2342d3772

2014-06-14 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Fabian Keil wrote: I assume that's because the info() call has the side effect of slightly delaying Curl_addHandleToPipeline(), but I haven't confirmed that. The attached patch uses wait_ms(1) instead of info() and works around the problem as well, so I consider this