Re: libssh2 optimization [was: Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?]

2018-08-26 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:09:58 +0200): >The patched version is CPU-bound on lower latencies; when the latency >goes higher, SSH window becomes the limiting factor. I read that HPN >SSH should do better on high latency links, didn't try it out. A lot of PR's for

Re: libssh2 optimization [was: Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?]

2018-08-26 Thread Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library
Daniel Jelinski via curl-library (Sun, 26 Aug 2018 09:09:58 +0200): >added 100ms: original 310kB/sec, patched 9900kB/sec Impressive results! >The patched version is CPU-bound on lower latencies; when the latency >goes higher, SSH window becomes the limiting factor. I read that HPN >SSH should do

Re: libssh2 optimization [was: Re: Windows users! Help us test upload performance tuning?]

2018-08-26 Thread Daniel Jeliński via curl-library
niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 03:36 Jan Ehrhardt via curl-library napisał(a): > Do you have any stats about the performanceimprovement? Workbench: I am running curl against openssh 7.2 shipped with Ubuntu. The server is running on the same machine as the client. I am uploading 1GB file to /dev/null on