Hello Steve and Daniel!
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Steve Holme wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> ...
> I understand your view point and I won't argue with that - its half a dozen
> of one and 6 of the other in my opinion.
Which weighs more,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:13:02PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016, Dan Fandrich wrote:
>
> >I wouldn't mind seeing CURL_STRICTER set automatically whenever
> >CURL_NO_OLDIES is set. The latter is used by people to ensure that their
> >code is forward-compatible with libcurl
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016, Dan Fandrich wrote:
I wouldn't mind seeing CURL_STRICTER set automatically whenever
CURL_NO_OLDIES is set. The latter is used by people to ensure that their
code is forward-compatible with libcurl and the CURL_STRICTER changes really
fall into the same bucket.
I agree, I
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:27:17PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Richard Gray wrote:
> >>Possibly most notable: we're reverting the change that modified the
> >>CURL, CURLM and CURLSH types and they go back to be 'void *' unless you
> >>define CURL_STRICTER before including
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> > I also appreciate this is a little subjective but I would have thought
> > adding support for NTLM with mbedTLS is also a new functionality -
> > previously NTLM wasn't supported with mbedTLS so I wouldn't class that as a
> > bug fix.
>
> That's
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016, Steve Holme wrote:
I also appreciate this is a little subjective but I would have thought
adding support for NTLM with mbedTLS is also a new functionality -
previously NTLM wasn't supported with mbedTLS so I wouldn't class that as a
bug fix.
That's of course a matter of
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> > I've already push Bill's mbedTLS NTLM addition and I'm hoping to get
> > Sergei's LDAP change pushed this weekend (although I might to step up and
> > finish the documentation side off!). Is this enough for a major bump as I
> > probably need to
2016-08-06 22:25 GMT+03:00 Daniel Stenberg :
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2016, Steve Holme wrote:
>
>> I've already push Bill's mbedTLS NTLM addition and I'm hoping to get
>> Sergei's LDAP change pushed this weekend (although I might to step up and
>> finish the documentation side off!). Is
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016, Steve Holme wrote:
I've already push Bill's mbedTLS NTLM addition and I'm hoping to get
Sergei's LDAP change pushed this weekend (although I might to step up and
finish the documentation side off!). Is this enough for a major bump as I
probably need to quote version
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> It is quite possible that the next release following 7.50.1 also will become
> a
> patch release since we don't have any particular changes queued up (that would
I've already push Bill's mbedTLS NTLM addition and I'm hoping to get Sergei's
LDAP
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Richard Gray wrote:
Possibly most notable: we're reverting the change that modified the CURL,
CURLM and CURLSH types and they go back to be 'void *' unless you define
CURL_STRICTER before including our headers.
I wonder if there's an itch that wants to be scratched in
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Ray Satiro via curl-library wrote:
I don't think that is the lesson here. I recall it has happened more than
once that a file needed by a release is missing. The lesson I think would be
to build from the planned release tarball prior to the actual release to
make sure it
dev_user wrote:
On 08/02/2016 05:18 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
Hi all!
I'll put together a 7.50.1 patch release tomorrow.
...
Possibly most notable: we're reverting the change that modified the
CURL, CURLM and CURLSH types and they go back to be 'void *' unless
> you define CURL_STRIC
On 8/2/2016 9:34 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
7.50.0 :TESTFAIL: These test cases failed: 1139 1140
So hopefully 7.50.1 reports a 100% clear on the testsuite.
We run most of our autobuild tests directly from git, so for example
these two tests 1139 and 1140 will succeed off git but fail in a
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, dev_user wrote:
Excellent. I will watch for that. As I noted on my email 27th July 2016
there seems to be a few tests that fail in various versions released over
the past little while :
7.50.0 :TESTFAIL: These test cases failed: 1139 1140
So hopefully 7.50.1 reports a
On 08/02/2016 05:18 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
Hi all!
I'll put together a 7.50.1 patch release tomorrow.
Excellent. I will watch for that. As I noted on my email 27th July 2016
there seems to be a few tests that fail in various versions released
over the past little while :
7.47.0
Hi all!
I'll put together a 7.50.1 patch release tomorrow. It'll include fixes for
three minor security problems and the set of bugfixes we've landed so far
since 7.50.0.
Possibly most notable: we're reverting the change that modified the CURL,
CURLM and CURLSH types and they go back
17 matches
Mail list logo