Re: Beast: a new HTTP library

2016-06-05 Thread dev_user
On 06/04/2016 09:02 AM, Vinnie Falco wrote: compiles on gcc, clang, and Visual Studio. So not what I would call portable at all. dc --- List admin: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette:

Re: Beast: a new HTTP library

2016-06-05 Thread dev_user
So, there is a lot to be said for Daniel's 20th-century c-hacker-ish software philosophy. I am not aware of any other acceptable approach. Based on my own experience over the past twenty years just about anything written in C++ becomes non-portable very fast and a library version nightmare.

Re: curl tshirts and hoodies

2016-06-07 Thread dev_user
On 06/07/2016 01:19 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hey, In case you're up for some good-looking curl tshirts or hoodies sporting the new logo, have a look here: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2016/06/07/curl-tshirts-and-hoodies/ 50% of the price is shipping but .. ordered ! Coffee cups in the (

Re: a new logo!

2016-05-27 Thread dev_user
On 05/27/2016 06:48 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hi friends, I'm happy to announce that we have a new logo looks sweet. Really nice. Dennis --- List admin: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette:

Re: curl user survey results 2016

2016-06-21 Thread dev_user
On 06/21/2016 08:12 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, dev_user wrote: That is one heck of a sub-title : "make SSL less of a nightmare" Not that I disagree. Haha, yeah I figured I should make it a tradition and subtitle the analysis with a quot

Re: curl user survey results 2016

2016-06-21 Thread dev_user
On 06/21/2016 05:39 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hey friends, It took me a while, but here's finally my summary of the user survey of 2016: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2016/06/21/curl-user-survey-results-2016/ That is one heck of a sub-title : "make SSL less of a nightmare" Not

Re: curl user survey results 2016

2016-06-21 Thread dev_user
On 06/21/2016 05:39 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hey friends, It took me a while, but here's finally my summary of the user survey of 2016: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2016/06/21/curl-user-survey-results-2016/ Someone said "IPv4 support" to the question "What feature/bug fix would you like

Re: curl user survey results 2016

2016-06-21 Thread dev_user
Also, just scanning top to bottom here, I am really surprised by the samset number. -e 's/samset/sample/' dc --- List admin: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html

Re: curl user survey results 2016

2016-06-21 Thread dev_user
On 06/21/2016 08:26 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, dev_user wrote: Someone said "IPv4 support" to the question "What feature/bug fix would you like to see the project REMOVE?" You may need to isolate the responses from that user and filter them out beca

Re: configure now needed in testcurl.sh for dailies ?

2016-05-21 Thread dev_user
On 05/21/2016 02:24 AM, dev_user wrote: I hate being one of those "this was working but now it isn't" reply to myself here .. with info .. node000 $ /usr/local/bin/git clone https://github.com/curl/curl.git Cloning into 'curl'... remote: Counting objects: 118642, done. remote: C

configure now needed in testcurl.sh for dailies ?

2016-05-21 Thread dev_user
I hate being one of those "this was working but now it isn't" types but my curl nightly build process came to a sudden halt with : testcurl: version = 2014-11-25 testcurl: date = Sat May 21 06:14:15 2016 UTC testcurl: curl is verified to be a fine daily source dir testcurl: build dir

Re: 7.49.0 a few stubborn tests fail on Solaris : 1139 1140

2016-05-22 Thread dev_user
On 05/22/2016 05:34 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Sun, 22 May 2016, dev_user wrote: trying to figure out why my test result email from nightly process failed : - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - <curl-autocomp...@haxx.se> Probably because the server was o

Re: 7.49.0 a few stubborn tests fail on Solaris : 1139 1140

2016-05-22 Thread dev_user
On 05/22/2016 10:42 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Sat, 21 May 2016, dev_user wrote: Thank you for the near instant reply :-) Will there be a near instant 7.49.1 release ? Just to close this hanging question. I posted separate mail about the plan: yes we intend to make a 7.49.1 release

Re: 7.49.0 a few stubborn tests fail on Solaris : 1139 1140

2016-05-20 Thread dev_user
On 05/20/2016 11:51 PM, Ray Satiro via curl-library wrote: On 5/20/2016 7:49 PM, dev_user wrote: TESTDONE: 780 tests out of 782 reported OK: 99% TESTFAIL: These test cases failed: 1139 1140 TESTDONE: 1026 tests were considered during 522 seconds. It's not specific to Solaris. It's been fixed

nightly skips a bucket of tests .. how to reduce that a bit

2016-05-21 Thread dev_user
So it looks like I have sorted out the issue with nightly builds and now I'd like to reduce the number of tests being skipped. I see this at the end of the nightly report : TESTDONE: 782 tests out of 782 reported OK: 100% TESTDONE: 1026 tests were considered during 529 seconds. TESTINFO: 244

Re: configure now needed in testcurl.sh for dailies ?

2016-05-21 Thread dev_user
On 05/21/2016 01:56 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Sat, 21 May 2016, dev_user wrote: What happens if you run buildconf there? ahhh .. sorry for my other reply .. first coffee of the day : Hehe, no worries. Glad it works. seems to be working great ! configure: Configured to build curl

Re: configure now needed in testcurl.sh for dailies ?

2016-05-21 Thread dev_user
On 05/21/2016 09:33 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Sat, 21 May 2016, dev_user wrote: node000 $ autoconf configure.ac:41: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation

Re: configure now needed in testcurl.sh for dailies ?

2016-05-21 Thread dev_user
What happens if you run buildconf there? ahhh .. sorry for my other reply .. first coffee of the day : node000 $ ./buildconf buildconf: autoconf version 2.69 (ok) buildconf: autom4te version 2.69 (ok) buildconf: autoheader version 2.69 (ok) buildconf: automake version 1.13 (ok) buildconf:

7.49.0 a few stubborn tests fail on Solaris : 1139 1140

2016-05-20 Thread dev_user
On 05/18/2016 02:22 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Curl and libcurl 7.49.0 Public curl releases: 154 Command line options: 185 curl_easy_setopt() options: 224 Public functions in libcurl: 61 Contributors: 1388 . . . TESTDONE: 780 tests out of 782 reported

transient test failures in curl for test 1139 and 1140

2016-07-27 Thread dev_user
Sort of strange results in a testsuite run on the same Solaris 10 server with very little or no environment changes at all : 7.45.0 :TESTDONE: 754 tests out of 754 reported OK: 100% 7.47.0 :TESTDONE: 771 tests out of 771 reported OK: 100% 7.47.1 :TESTDONE: 771 tests out of 771 reported OK:

Re: transient test failures in curl for test 1139 and 1140

2016-07-28 Thread dev_user
On 07/27/2016 02:22 PM, Ray Satiro via curl-library wrote: On 7/27/2016 1:11 PM, dev_user wrote: Sort of strange results in a testsuite run on the same Solaris 10 server with very little or no environment changes at all : 7.45.0 :TESTDONE: 754 tests out of 754 reported OK: 100% 7.47.0

Re: transient test failures in curl for test 1139 and 1140

2016-07-29 Thread dev_user
Thanks, that is a known issue with 7.50 and has been fixed [1], CURLINFO_HTTP_VERSION.3 was missing. I'll assume there will be a 7.50.1 version shortly. Dennis You can just import the missing files locally, if you are in hurry, like we did in Fedora:

Re: patch release tomorrow

2016-08-02 Thread dev_user
On 08/02/2016 05:18 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hi all! I'll put together a 7.50.1 patch release tomorrow. Excellent. I will watch for that. As I noted on my email 27th July 2016 there seems to be a few tests that fail in various versions released over the past little while : 7.47.0

Re: [RELEASE] curl and libcurl 7.50.1 is out!

2016-08-04 Thread dev_user
Curl and libcurl 7.50.1 Public curl releases: 157 Command line options: 185 curl_easy_setopt() options: 224 Public functions in libcurl: 61 Contributors: 1425 So the progress report from my side looks like : 7.47.0 :TESTDONE: 771 tests out of 771

Re: transient test failures in curl for test 1139 and 1140

2016-07-29 Thread dev_user
That is exactly why I used GitHub URLs containing the release tag in > them ;-) That is not a "release". That is a the ever changing code base. Consider ISC BIND : https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-announce/2016-July/000998.html Consider Libidn :

Re: Pruning the download page

2016-08-17 Thread dev_user
On 08/17/16 08:39, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hi friends, I've always enjoyed the fact that our downlods page is extremely extensive with links to downloads for just about everything you can imagine. Will this cause the sky to fall down? heck no .. prune it .. burn it to the ground. Will it

Re: configure finding system openssl instead of my own

2016-09-02 Thread dev_user
On 09/02/16 12:19, Linus Nordberg wrote: Hi, Trying to get configure to find and alternate openssl.. try setting a few env vars : CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/ssl/lib LD_RUN_PATH=/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/ssl/lib then

Re: Introducing 'Everything curl' - the book

2016-08-30 Thread dev_user
On 08/30/16 04:44, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hi friends! Almost a year ago I set off to write a book about curl and everything that is related to it. Yeah, I call it Everything curl. Will we be able to order an autographed copy ? Yes really. Dennis

Re: a security patch release

2016-09-09 Thread dev_user
On 09/09/2016 04:00 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hello friends, We've gotten another security problem reported that affects libcurl. This particular problem has already been discussed in public in some circles so I think it would be unfortunate to wait a whole release cycle until we ship a fix.

Re: a North American conf? (was Re: Save the date: November 19-20)

2016-09-21 Thread dev_user
On 09/21/2016 05:15 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, bch wrote: Very cool! Don't know if this thread is appropriate, or if another is warranted, but curious what interest in North American conf is. Branch this email thread appropriately, good luck with preparations for

Re: curl library 7.36.0: curl_easy_perform() function call failed when used for getting a file from Window's machine to my linux box

2016-10-19 Thread dev_user
On 10/19/2016 11:35 AM, Zhao, Joe wrote: Has this issue being reported or has it been addressed in the new curl releases? Merely a small question : Is there a good reason why you are using libcurl from years ago ? If you need to run applications with libcurl it

Re: curl library 7.36.0: curl_easy_perform() function call failed when used for getting a file from Window's machine to my linux box

2016-10-20 Thread dev_user
On 10/19/2016 08:20 PM, Zhao, Joe wrote: There is no scp.c in curl package 7.36.0 I have scp and sftp being used with libssh2 and libcurl very neatly for years also. Very stable. However I am generally doing updates of libcurl often and simply doing a recompile of libcurl as well as openssl

Re: TLS 1.3

2016-10-24 Thread dev_user
I'm pretty sure server people will appreciate being able to try out their TLS 1.3 work with curl once it starts to get more widespread adoption. Be certain of it. I use curl to test protocol compliance on systems all the time. Dennis

Re: stop shipping PDF and HTML versions in tarballs?

2016-10-17 Thread dev_user
I'm personally not that interested in that as I see no clear benefit. I think a decent package should ship with docs included - and the docs that isn't included can usually just as well be served on the web site only. So leave everything in one compressed tarball and life goes on. Bandwidth

Re: stop shipping PDF and HTML versions in tarballs?

2016-10-16 Thread dev_user
On 10/10/16 02:41, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hi friends! Do the HTML and PDF versions of our man pages that we ship in every tarball provide any value to you? Removing them from the tarballs would take away between 30-35% of the compressed file size and thus produce much smaller release packages.

Re: stop shipping PDF and HTML versions in tarballs?

2016-10-16 Thread dev_user
On 10/10/16 02:41, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Hi friends! Do the HTML and PDF versions of our man pages that we ship in every tarball provide any value to you? Removing them from the tarballs would take away between 30-35% of the compressed file size and thus produce much smaller release packages.

Re: Status of IDN support?

2017-01-10 Thread dev_user
On 01/10/2017 09:20 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: Hello, just checking, but after the switch to libidn2 it was suggested to disable IDN support because reasons (can't remember right now, but probably bugs), and so I did in the Debian packages. Is it safe to re-enable it now? Just hold on a

Re: Tests 1060, 1061 fail

2017-01-09 Thread dev_user
On 01/09/2017 10:44 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, Spork Schivago wrote: That's what I thought you were doing originally. Using the goto just as a simple fix, to see if it'd correct the problem. But then I thought I saw a post where you were going to commit it to the main

Re: [DKIM] State of CMake support?

2017-01-06 Thread dev_user
On 01/06/2017 01:08 PM, Noam Chitayat wrote: I can imagine that lack of appropriate SONAME may be problematic for you. I only need to build a static library, so perhaps that wouldn't pose as much of a problem. The only other issue, then, is that I'm having a hard time finding any documentation

Re: Tests 1060, 1061 fail

2017-01-05 Thread dev_user
On 01/04/2017 04:07 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On OpenBSD, curl 7.52.1's regression tests 1060 and 1061 fail. Exact same tests fail in Solaris 10 servers and I am convinced they are because of some minor and entirely insignificant bug. I think our OpenBSD friend has found the same.

Re: Tests 1060, 1061 fail

2017-01-08 Thread dev_user
On 01/08/2017 10:54 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Sun, 8 Jan 2017, Spork Schivago wrote: dclarke $ diff -c tests/server/sws.c_backup tests/server/sws.c *** tests/server/sws.c_backup Mon Dec 19 07:27:56 2016 --- tests/server/sws.c Mon Jan 9 01:30:25 2017 *** *** 1200,1207

Re: Tests 1060, 1061 fail

2017-01-08 Thread dev_user
On 01/08/2017 09:02 PM, Spork Schivago wrote: dev_user, I didn't know about the Pascal goto's being considered poor code. I was referring to C. I want to say when I was majoring in Computer Science up at the local college, we were told to try to avoid them and I almost remember something

Re: Tests 1060, 1061 fail

2017-01-08 Thread dev_user
On 01/08/2017 12:10 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Christian Weisgerber wrote: That's the swrite() in tests/server/sws.c line 1203 that fails. Further debugging shows the error to be EAGAIN. Shouldn't this be non-fatal and retried? Okay, so can you please apply this test

Re: Tests 1060, 1061 fail

2017-01-08 Thread dev_user
On 01/08/2017 05:38 PM, Spork Schivago wrote: Daniel, I'm sorry for butting in here, but is there no easy to way to write the code without using the goto statements? I seem to remember using goto's was frowned upon by some programmers back in the day, at least with the C programming language.

Re: [RELEASE] curl 7.52.0

2016-12-21 Thread dev_user
On 12/21/2016 08:47 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Curl and libcurl 7.52.0 Hi again, It only took 6 hours until we got a security problem reported that slipped into this release. We will now work on a quick patch release. If you're not in a hurry, you

looking at commit 3ab3c16db6a5674f53cf23d56512a405fde0b2c9

2016-12-21 Thread dev_user
at line 136 why is this here ? +/* DBL_MAX value from Linux */ +#define MAXIMIZE

Re: [RELEASE] curl 7.52.1

2016-12-23 Thread dev_user
On 12/23/2016 04:50 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote: Due to unfortunate circumstances, a bad bug managed to manifest itself in the previous release, so here's a quick follow-up with that mistake corrected. I wrote an explanation and back story on what

Re: looking at commit 3ab3c16db6a5674f53cf23d56512a405fde0b2c9

2016-12-21 Thread dev_user
C:\projects\curl\tests\libtest\lib557.c(1632): fatal error C1064: compiler limit : token overflowed internal buffer [C:\projects\curl\build.msvc2012\tests\libtest\lib557.vcxproj] Haha. I just happened to get that value as part of a conversation In conversation someone rattled off 2^1024 to