On Thu 08 Oct 2015 at 17:59:22 +, Stephan wrote:
> IMHO it would be valid to pass the value of sp as the first argument
> (mov r0, sp). However, the way how r0 is computed looks quite
> obfuscated to me:
>
>0x4621402c : mov r3, sp=> ?
>0x46214030
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.NetBSD.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2015.10.11.01.01.45.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
--- dependall-lua ---
Updating src tree:
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/mi
P src/doc/3RDPARTY
P src/doc/CHANGES
P src/etc/mtree/Makefile
U src/etc/mtree/NetBSD.dist.dtrace
P src/lib/libc/time/Makefile
P src/lib/libc/time/NEWS
P src/lib/libc/time/localtime.c
P src/lib/libc/time/private.h
P src/lib/libc/time/strftime.c
P