Updating src tree:
P src/libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c
P src/libexec/httpd/content-bozo.c
P src/libexec/mail.local/mail.local.c
P src/share/man/man9/driver.9
P src/share/misc/acronyms
P src/sys/arch/playstation2/dev/sbus.c
P src/sys/arch/playstation2/dev/spd.c
P
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, bch wrote:
Running cc(1) or cvs(1) fails with the following. My kernel/userland
is very up-to-date, but my machine did just shutdown w/ a dead
battery, too ( it usually catches the issue quickly enough and issues
a shutdown, though I'm not sure that happened in time this
Running cc(1) or cvs(1) fails with the following. My kernel/userland
is very up-to-date, but my machine did just shutdown w/ a dead
battery, too ( it usually catches the issue quickly enough and issues
a shutdown, though I'm not sure that happened in time this instance).
Anybody else
Well, I've been running a 7.99.33 kernel (sources dated 2016-07-04 at
08:34:20 UTC) for two weeks now without any further crashes. Maybe the
problem is fixed? Or maybe is has just gone into hiding, lurking,
waiting to reappear?
:)
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Takahiro Hayashi wrote:
On
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Greg Troxel wrote:
Andreas Gustafsson writes:
I can appreciate that - different people have different preferences
and workflows. I'd like to hear the opinions of other developers -
if there is a consensus that "build has been fixed" email notifications
Andreas Gustafsson writes:
> I can appreciate that - different people have different preferences
> and workflows. I'd like to hear the opinions of other developers -
> if there is a consensus that "build has been fixed" email notifications
> would be useful, I can certainly add
Date:Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:40:34 +0300
From:Andreas Gustafsson
Message-ID: <22413.62866.53313.424...@guava.gson.org>
| You don't have to screen scrape the HTML reports - you can get the
| underlying data by anonymous rsync, as described in
|
|
Robert Elz wrote:
> | If the page says "Build: OK" at the end, the issue has
> | been fixed. At least for me, this is less work overall than it would
> | be to handle twice the number of emails.
>
> I actually cannot imagine that being possible for me, one more e-mail to
> delete every few
Date:Sat, 16 Jul 2016 12:15:41 +0300
From:Andreas Gustafsson
Message-ID: <22409.64317.493648.115...@guava.gson.org>
| It would not be hard to implement, but I'm not sure it would be useful
| enough to justify doubling the number of messages to the