Updating src tree:
P src/distrib/sets/Makefile
P src/distrib/sets/mkvars.mk
P src/distrib/sets/sets.subr
P src/distrib/sets/lists/xbase/shl.mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/xcomp/mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/xcomp/shl.mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/xdebug/mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/xdebug/shl.mi
P
Hi Jaromir,
> Am 13.08.2016 um 22:06 schrieb Jaromír Doleček :
> FWIW, build of tools for both i386 and sparc64 finished without
> problems for me on Mac OS X host (10.11.6), building from clean
> sources.
Do you have the Mac OS X Command Line Tools installed?
It’s not
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 01:51:38PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>> BTW should we mark pf and ipf deprecated in netbsd-8 as they aren't
>> well maintained nowadays?
>
> While they are not maintained, PF works quite well for
On Monday 2016-08-15 17:14 +1000, Joerg Sonnenberger output:
:[] There are still quite a few issues with NPF, primarily
:documentation issues, but also some functional ones. It seems a bit
[...]
I recently ran into an NPF bug (PR 50511 from December last year).
A cursory scan suggested it was
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 09:13:46AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
|On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 01:51:38PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
|> BTW should we mark pf and ipf deprecated in netbsd-8 as they aren't
|> well maintained nowadays?
|
|While they are not maintained, PF works quite well for the
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 01:51:38PM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> BTW should we mark pf and ipf deprecated in netbsd-8 as they aren't
> well maintained nowadays?
While they are not maintained, PF works quite well for the feature set
our version has. There are still quite a few issues with NPF,
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
First of all, bpf (bpfjit) is different from the others. bpf sniffs
raw packets on rx/tx in network device drivers (grep bpf_mtap) and
also allows to send raw packets directly via ifp->if_output
(e.g., ether_output). It doesn't provide pass/block filters