daily CVS update output

2016-08-21 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/doc/CHANGES P src/external/bsd/unbound/Makefile.inc P src/external/mit/xorg/lib/libdrm_nouveau/Makefile P src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-nouveau/Makefile P src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-openchrome/Makefile P

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread Roy Marples
On 2016-08-21 15:38, chris...@zoulas.com wrote: On Aug 21, 10:28am, t...@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote: -- Subject: Re: bind -> unbound/nsd | I am strongly opposed to removing basic server functionality present | in BSD Unix for over 30 years -- and still in widespread use -- from

unbound user and group fix-hint at end of installation ./build.sh

2016-08-21 Thread bch
At the end of ./build.sh, I got a note about needing to include _unbound to user and group. Isn't that something that should just be handled by etcupdate (in fact, it looks like etcupdate does know about this)? Why would we suggest an error-prone manual update when the next step in the update

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread coypu
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 03:07:18PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote: > There are regular pullups for security issues. Thus your list > would only be correct for 6.0 itself, and not for subsequent 6.x > releases. And, if one didn't update from 6.0 at all, there would > be plenty of other issues

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread John Nemeth
On Aug 21, 9:47pm, co...@sdf.org wrote: } On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:10:18AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: } > } > The recent change of ISC/bind licensing from BSD to MPL for the } > next release has provided us with an opportunity to re-evaluate } > the preferred daemon status for NetBSD and

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread coypu
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:10:18AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > Hello, > > The recent change of ISC/bind licensing from BSD to MPL for the > next release has provided us with an opportunity to re-evaluate > the preferred daemon status for NetBSD and DNS resolution. Board/Core > have decided

re: xorg-server 1.18 ready for testing on x86 and shark

2016-08-21 Thread matthew green
> nbmake[13]: nbmake[13]: don't know how to make > /usr/obj/external/mit/xorg/server/xorg-server/glamor/libglamor.a. Stop ah, this is a simple ordering issue i had missed due to manually building this once.. please try with external/mit/xorg/server/xorg-server/Makefile rev 1.27. thanks for

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread John Nemeth
On Aug 21, 10:28am, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: } On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:13:13PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: } > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:55:48AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote: } > > For example, I would use nsd on exactly one machine in my environment, } > > my public facing DNS server which

Re: xorg-server 1.18 ready for testing on x86 and shark

2016-08-21 Thread Mike
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 05:46:01PM +0100, Dave Tyson wrote: > cvs updated current src,xsrc earlier today and just had a try at building > this > with a clean obj directory and it blows up being unable to make libglamor.a > > ===> build.sh command:./build.sh -V HAVE_XORG_SERVER_VER=118 -u -U

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:28:39AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:13:13PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:55:48AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > > > For example, I would use nsd on exactly one machine in my environment, > > > my public

Re: xorg-server 1.18 ready for testing on x86 and shark

2016-08-21 Thread Dave Tyson
cvs updated current src,xsrc earlier today and just had a try at building this with a clean obj directory and it blows up being unable to make libglamor.a ===> build.sh command:./build.sh -V HAVE_XORG_SERVER_VER=118 -u -U -x -T /usr/tools -O /usr/obj -j 2 release ===> build.sh started:

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread David Young
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:38:44AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > On Aug 21, 10:28am, t...@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: bind -> unbound/nsd > | I am strongly opposed to removing basic server functionality present > | in BSD Unix for over 30 years -- and still in

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread Christos Zoulas
On Aug 21, 10:28am, t...@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote: -- Subject: Re: bind -> unbound/nsd | I am strongly opposed to removing basic server functionality present | in BSD Unix for over 30 years -- and still in widespread use -- from NetBSD. | I don't mind replacing BIND but all its

Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

2016-08-21 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:13:13PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:55:48AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > > For example, I would use nsd on exactly one machine in my environment, > > my public facing DNS server which is exactly where it belongs. > > > > On the other

build breakage on -current (gdt.c)

2016-08-21 Thread Thomas Klausner
--- gdt.o --- /disk/6/archive/foreign/src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/gdt.c:212:1: error: 'gdt_grow' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] gdt_grow(void) ^ I think during building the xen kernels. I don't see any commit to that file. The only caller of that function is inside #if