Is NetBSD ReFUSE layer capable to do MTP?

2016-09-04 Thread Daniel Ölschlegel
Hello, i have a simple question, i worked on some packages to getting access to my smartphone(Xiaomi Mi4 with Android 6) via MTP. But all attempts ended up that i cannot see any device. So is this a problem with NetBSD ReFUSE or a problem with the port? The library libmtp(in Pkgsrc) comes with

daily CVS update output

2016-09-04 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/bin/dd/dd.c P src/bin/echo/echo.c P src/bin/expr/expr.y P src/bin/ls/main.c P src/bin/ps/ps.c P src/bin/sync/sync.c P src/bin/test/test.c P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/shl.mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/shl.mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/deb

Re: -current 7.99.36 multicast panic: trap

2016-09-04 Thread Kengo NAKAHARA
Hi, On 2016/09/05 1:00, Frank Kardel wrote: > running the -current (7.99.36) with 7.99.16 userland reliably traps at: > > src/sys/netinet/ip_mroute.c:1751 > > on an multi-homed i386 system running mrouted. > > A 7.99.16 kernel survives that fine. Do we have a userland dependency or > is this a

Re: Building on OS X - how?

2016-09-04 Thread Hubert Feyrer
Good evening, On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Hubert Feyrer wrote: I've added a bit more information below[2], but to cut a long story short - what excact build.sh options does one use these days to cross-build -current/amd64 from OS X? Did I miss any documentation[3] It seems this was resolved somewhe

-current 7.99.36 multicast panic: trap

2016-09-04 Thread Frank Kardel
Hi ! running the -current (7.99.36) with 7.99.16 userland reliably traps at: src/sys/netinet/ip_mroute.c:1751 on an multi-homed i386 system running mrouted. A 7.99.16 kernel survives that fine. Do we have a userland dependency or is this a new regression from the network stack multiprocessing