Updating src tree:
P src/doc/TODO.ptrace
P src/external/mit/xorg/lib/libICE/Makefile
P src/share/man/man4/wm.4
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/boot.c
P src/sys/arch/shark/ofw/ofw.c
P src/sys/arch/sparc64/dev/ldc.c
P src/sys/arch/sparc64/dev/vdsk.c
P src/sys/dev/marvell/mvsdio.c
P
Hi,
On 2017/03/04 4:31, Tomohiro Kusumi wrote:
> Hi
>
> Now I'm at
> $NetBSD: if_wm.c,v 1.495 2017/03/03 07:57:49
> but still hits the same assertion located at L6622.
Ahh, sorry, the newest revision is not r1.495 but r1.496...
r1.495 is not fixed yet.
The ident of r1.496 is
Hi
Now I'm at
$NetBSD: if_wm.c,v 1.495 2017/03/03 07:57:49
but still hits the same assertion located at L6622.
Btw I'm running this on a vm guest.
Haven't looked into any detail of this panic, but is this a race that
no one else is seeing ?
-
6616 4b2db683293e (msaitoh 2010-01-14
NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
> net/arp/t_dad:dad_basic
> net/ndp/t_ra:ra_multiple_routers_maxifprefixes
Please take this particular report with a grain of salt.
Netbooted a new box with this morning's -current/amd64, so its
network interface is successfully configured. ftping the sets
failed. I just typed dhcpcd to check, and:
uvm_fault(0x815a7aa0, 0x0, 1) -> e
fatal page fault in supervisor mode
trap type 6 code 0 rip 8022de45 cs 8
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/arp/t_dad:dad_basic
net/ndp/t_ra:ra_multiple_routers_maxifprefixes
The above tests failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs
Hi,
On 2017/03/04 0:29, Tomohiro Kusumi wrote:
> Yes, the source says 1.492 which is very recent.
> I guess I'll just revert to the one that was (safely)working for now.
>
> 1.492 2017/03/03 03:33:44 knakahara
Sorry, it is my mistake as you point out. I fix it r1.495 just now.
Could you try
Hi
Yes, the source says 1.492 which is very recent.
I guess I'll just revert to the one that was (safely)working for now.
1.492 2017/03/03 03:33:44 knakahara
From: Robert Elz
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 17:16
To: Tomohiro Kusumi;
Date:Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:13:36 +
From:Tomohiro Kusumi
Message-ID: <1488543216003.86...@tuxera.com>
| I'm at the below commit (don't know the CVS revision as I don't use CVS),
The cvs rev of the if_wm.c should still be available in the