daily CVS update output

Updating src tree: P src/sys/dev/pci/if_wm.c P src/sys/dev/usb/if_axe.c P src/sys/dev/usb/xhci.c P src/sys/netipsec/ipip_var.h P src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_netbsd.c P src/sys/netipsec/xform_ipip.c Updating xsrc tree: Killing core files: Updating release-6 src tree (netbsd-6): Updating

Two fatal errors with yesterday's -current

With sources built from 2018-04-20 23:11:20 UTC I encountered two fatal errors while booting: First, the system was unable to identify either of my hard drives: ... [ 6.4285988] ums0 at uhidev2: 3 buttons and Z dir [ 6.4285988] wsmouse0 at ums0 mux 0 [ 6.6787124] wd0: IDENTIFY failed [

Re: running out of file descriptors

We (NetBSD) still have a historical construct in config(5) that a bunch of system-wide limits like MAXFILES are calculated from a presumed average or median amount of those resources per user, expressed as multiples of “maxusers [n]” in config(5). We may wish to survey typical applications now

Re: current status of autofs?

On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:45:12 +0700 Robert Elz wrote: Hi, > Ignoring the typo that rhialto pointed out (perhaps just in the e-mail) those Yes, typing mistake on e-mail, not actually affecting my rc.conf > > What is needed is > > autofs=YES > > The "name" in the

Re: current status of autofs?

Date:Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:15:21 +0200 From:Edmond Dantes Message-ID: <20180422141521.8a336a3fa62a76969fc07...@gmx.us> | If I echoed automount=YES, autmountd=YES and autounmountd=YES to /etc/rc.conf, Ignoring the typo that rhialto pointed out

Re: current status of autofs?

On Sun 22 Apr 2018 at 14:15:21 +0200, Edmond Dantes wrote: > It seems that that the problem was somehow related to rc.conf: If I > echoed automount=YES, autmountd=YES and autounmountd=YES to ^ o missing? > /etc/rc.conf, this didn't result in the services being enbled at

Re: current status of autofs?

On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 18:33:27 + (UTC) chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote: > I've used it with nfs. Can you share the example that is not working > for you? > > christos Hi, thanks for the prompt reply. First of all I apologize for the multiple e-mails I ended up sending: The SSL