On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 03:22:17PM +1100, Geoff Wing wrote:
> :> > Is this a problem with my setup?
> :> Think it may be an httpd issue. Used the cert/key with postfix and tested
> :> with openssl s_client and didn't see any issues.
Notice this thread late. I have same issue with httpd
On Monday 2019-12-16 19:56 -0600, ed...@pettijohn-web.com output:
:> > Certificate/key created like so:
:> > openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 365 -sha256 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout
:> > mycert.pem -out mycert.pem
[...]
:> > Is this a problem with my setup?
:> Think it may be an httpd issue. Used the
Updating src tree:
P src/crypto/external/bsd/heimdal/Makefile.inc
P src/crypto/external/bsd/heimdal/bin/krb5-config/Makefile
P src/distrib/evbarm/instkernel/instkernel/Makefile
P src/distrib/utils/embedded/conf/arm64.conf
P src/distrib/utils/embedded/conf/armv7.conf
P
*[ 81623.3847677] panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "!cpu_intr_p()"
failed: file "/c/usr/src/sys/uvm/pmap/pmap_tlb.c", line 979[ 81623.3847677]
cpu0: Begin traceback...[ 81623.3847677] 0x9df29aac: netbsd:vpanic+0x16c[
81623.3847677] Bad frame pointer: 0x80ab79bc[ 81623.3847677] cpu0: End
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NetBSD Security Advisory 2019-006
=
Topic: Denial of service and possible privilege escallation in filemon
Version:NetBSD-current: affected up to 9.99.17
On 2019-12-15 20:09, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On 2019-12-15 18:18, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
laptop$ uname -a
NetBSD laptop.my.domain 9.99.24 NetBSD 9.99.24 (GENERIC_KASLR) #0:
Sat Dec 14 21:37:06 CST 2019
r...@laptop.my.domain:/usr/obj/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC_KASLR
amd64
Testing ssl
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2019.12.16.15.59.04.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
Hello,
with enabled DEBUG:
--- if_ena.o ---
/usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_ena.c: In function 'ena_request_io_irq':
/usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_ena.c:2089:7: error: unused variable 'irq_slot'
[-Werror=unused-variable]
int irq_slot = i + irq_off;
^~~~
Regards
Uwe
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:52:32PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Yes, but as a fallback it is good (and sometimes you have "serial console"
> and working copy & paste - though with modern server management this seems
> to be a lost property).
As a fallback, you can boot hd0b:/netbsd
The dev
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:50:39PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> I thought about it, but requiring the user to enter an UUID to boot
> seems harsh.
Yes, but as a fallback it is good (and sometimes you have "serial console"
and working copy & paste - though with modern server management this
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:45:52PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> P.S.: sysinst offer naming the partitions (in the partitions detail menu),
> but it does not come up with names by itself. Could the boot code fall back
> to the guid if no name is available?
I thought about it, but requiring the
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 08:52:29AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the bug by avoid using NAME= when there
> is no label. Once applied, rebuild src/sts/arch/i386/stand and
> install updated bootstrap.
This makes my old installation boot again!
Please commit + request
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 08:41:15AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Yes, it is. I took a bootable UEFI installation (in VirtualBox) and replaced
> the efi/boot/*.efi files on the MSDOS/EFI partition with the ones from
> the latest netbsd-9 build and it stopped booting as you describe.
I have a fix
13 matches
Mail list logo
