Updating src tree:
P src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi
P src/etc/root/dot.profile
P src/share/man/man4/ess.4
P src/share/man/man4/options.4
P src/share/man/man4/sf2r.4
P src/share/man/man4/sony.4
P src/share/man/man4/viomb.4
P src/share/man/man4/wss.4
P src/share/man/man4/man4.i386/elansc.4
P
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 15:08, Robert Nestor wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2020, at 1:57 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 15:41, Robert Nestor wrote:
> >>
> >> I received a couple of messages off list that suggested a few things and
> >> it prompted me to try investigating
Hi Nia,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 5:57 PM nia wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> > We still need to protect the unique identity and reputation of
> > WireGuard (our "brand"). This ensures that when people see the
> > WireGuard name or logo, they know it is something we, the
> > WireGuard developers, have
>> We still need to protect the unique identity and reputation of
>> WireGuard (our "brand").
If someone feels this way about it, in my opinion it should be
summarily yanked out and never, ever, EVER let back in - at least if
there is any legal force behind that attitude. NetBSD's users already
Hi Jason,
> We still need to protect the unique identity and reputation of
> WireGuard (our "brand"). This ensures that when people see the
> WireGuard name or logo, they know it is something we, the
> WireGuard developers, have worked on."
Personally, I would be in favour of entirely rebranding
On Aug 23, 2020, at 1:57 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 at 15:41, Robert Nestor wrote:
>>
>> I received a couple of messages off list that suggested a few things and it
>> prompted me to try investigating further with just components found in
>> NetBSD.
>>
>> This test
