Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer

2022-12-21 Thread Martin Husemann
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 08:05:02AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote: > Ok. So, it appears the -bios image has become redundant now. Or hasn't it? No, there are BIOSes out there that don't work with the hybrid bootloader. Martin

daily CVS update output

2022-12-21 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/external/bsd/nsd/Makefile.inc P src/external/bsd/unbound/Makefile.inc P src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_interceptors_ioctl_netbsd.inc P src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_netbsd.cc P

Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer

2022-12-21 Thread Mayuresh
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 06:18:41AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote: > I used the second (non-BIOS) image because I guessed it might be a hybrid > installer. I think that my old NUCs only support BIOS booting from USB > sticks, but I could easily be wrong. Ok. So, it appears the -bios image has become

Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer

2022-12-21 Thread Salil Wadnerkar
Greg Troxel wrote: Salil Wadnerkar writes: Mayuresh wrote: On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote: I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT, I notice a separate image marked "bios" NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz

Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer

2022-12-21 Thread Greg Troxel
Salil Wadnerkar writes: > Mayuresh wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote: >>> I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT, >> I notice a separate image marked "bios" >> >> NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz >>

Re: nss_winbind not functional anymore on NetBSD 9.99.106 and Samba 4.16.5

2022-12-21 Thread Christos Zoulas
Does this help? https://ogris.de/samba/unix-active-directory.html christos > On Dec 21, 2022, at 11:31 AM, Kunihiro Yasukouchi > wrote: > > Hi, > > little bit old topic,,, > >> combination NetBSD 9.99.106 and Samba 4.16.5(from pkgsrc 2022Q3), >> the name resolution for usernames / groups

Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer

2022-12-21 Thread Lloyd Parkes
On 22/12/22 02:33, Mayuresh wrote: On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote: I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT, I notice a separate image marked "bios" NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz

Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer

2022-12-21 Thread Salil Wadnerkar
Mayuresh wrote: On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote: I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT, I notice a separate image marked "bios" NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-install.img.gz So

Re: nss_winbind not functional anymore on NetBSD 9.99.106 and Samba 4.16.5

2022-12-21 Thread Kunihiro Yasukouchi
Hi, little bit old topic,,, > combination NetBSD 9.99.106 and Samba 4.16.5(from pkgsrc 2022Q3), > the name resolution for usernames / groups via nss_winbind does not work > anymore. I've also faced this issue on NetBSD 9.99.10[68], 10.99.1 and net/samba4 4.16.x, 4.17.x however, NetBSD

Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer

2022-12-21 Thread Mayuresh
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 09:25:30AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote: > I was installing on amd64 and the installer let me choose either MBR or GPT, I notice a separate image marked "bios" NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-bios-install.img.gz NetBSD-10.0_BETA-amd64-install.img.gz So wonder, which

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

2022-12-21 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the NetBSD test suite. The newly failing test case is: lib/libc/locale/t_mbstowcs:mbstowcs_basic The above test failed in each of the last 5 test runs, and passed in at least 25 consecutive runs before that. The following

panic in knote

2022-12-21 Thread Manuel Bouyer
Hello in my daily tests of HEAD: https://www-soc.lip6.fr/~bouyer/NetBSD-tests/xen/HEAD/ I've seen twice this panic: kernel/kqueue/t_proc4 (80/939): 1 test cases proc4: [ 538.1439841] uvm_fault(0xc287759c, 0, 2) -> 0xe [ 538.1642020] fatal page fault in supervisor mode [ 538.1755046] trap type