Updating src tree:
P src/lib/libc/cdb/cdbr.3
P src/share/misc/acronyms.comp
P src/sys/arch/x86/include/specialreg.h
P src/sys/arch/x86/x86/errata.c
P src/sys/sys/clock.h
Updating xsrc tree:
Killing core files:
Updating tar files:
src/top-level: collecting... replacing... done
src/bin:
Tobias Nygren wrote:
> The header being used from the tools build was an unexpected surprise
> but such reasons are why those ifdef guards exist. So I think it
> just just be put back the way it was. The example came from
> sys/atomic.h so it shouldn't be controversial.
I've just reverted the
Valery Ushakov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 19:10:09 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
>
> > isn't installed on all architectures? The original
> > change was to include but then that added #ifdef magic.
> >
> > Since is already a system header file, wouldn't it be
> > better to make sure is
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 19:10:09 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> isn't installed on all architectures? The original
> change was to include but then that added #ifdef magic.
>
> Since is already a system header file, wouldn't it be
> better to make sure is installed everywhere?
This happens
Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:49:53AM +0200, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> > The header being used from the tools build was an unexpected surprise
> > but such reasons are why those ifdef guards exist. So I think it
> > just just be put back the way it was. The example came from
>
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again.
The following commits were made between the last failed build and the
first successful build:
2023.10.27.06.31.48 mrg src/sys/arch/x86/include/specialreg.h 1.209
Logs can be found at:
This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386
build failure.
The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host,
using sources from CVS date 2023.10.27.05.45.00.
An extract from the build.sh output follows:
--- errata.o ---
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:49:53AM +0200, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> The header being used from the tools build was an unexpected surprise
> but such reasons are why those ifdef guards exist. So I think it
> just just be put back the way it was. The example came from
> sys/atomic.h so it shouldn't be
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:03:48 +0200
Adam wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This change:
>
> --- clock.h 26 Oct 2023 00:59:16 - 1.5
> +++ clock.h 26 Oct 2023 14:04:45 - 1.6
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* $NetBSD: clock.h,v 1.5 2023/10/26 00:59:16 jschauma Exp $ */
> +/* $NetBSD: clock.h,v 1.6 2023/10/26
Greetings,
This change:
--- clock.h 26 Oct 2023 00:59:16 - 1.5
+++ clock.h 26 Oct 2023 14:04:45 - 1.6
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $NetBSD: clock.h,v 1.5 2023/10/26 00:59:16 jschauma Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: clock.h,v 1.6 2023/10/26 14:04:45 jschauma Exp $ */
/*-
* Copyright (c) 1996 The NetBSD
10 matches
Mail list logo