Re: vmstat

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:12:14 + Patrick Welche wrote: > # vmstat -C > Pool cache statistics. > Name Spin GrpSz Full Emty PoolLayer CacheLayer Hit% > CpuLayer Hit% amappl 863 660496221 > 1592973 68.8 563372236 99.7 anonpl 6077263 11400 0 >

Re: Weird vnodes use count

On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:59:56 +0200 "J. Hannken-Illjes" wrote: > > On 18. Jun 2020, at 11:20, Lars Reichardt > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > currently I see these use counts on NetBSD current (amd64): > > > > 190698 active vnodes &g

Weird vnodes use count

Hi, currently I see these use counts on NetBSD current (amd64): 190698 active vnodes *** MOUNT ffs /dev/sd0a on / (log,local,root file system) ADDR TYP VFLAG USE HOLD TAG NPAGE FILEID IFLAG RDEV|SZ 957a316fd4c0 dirRM -2147483630 1 1 0 2 - 512 957a319c2040

Re: current: completely stuck after four minutes of uptime

On 2020-03-16 10:45, Thomas Klausner wrote: On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:29:15AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: I've just upgraded my 9.99.49 kernel from March 12 to today's from an hour ago. After rebooting, the machine got stuck in less than five minutes. No reaction to CTRL-ALT-ESC from the

Re: Display glitches with radeon display

On 19.02.2020 16:51, Robert Swindells wrote: Is anyone else seeing black boxes and distorted bitmap text when using an older radeon display in -current. I last updated this machine in early Jan and everything was fine then. Yes, I've seen some glitches if a lot of redrawing is happening

Re: nouveau unhappy with EFI

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:16:00 +0100 Patrick Welche wrote: > With biosboot set on the root partition of a GPT disk, I can now > biosboot or EFI boot the same computer. > > Thanks to mlelstv@'s hint, I can get a serial console on the EFI side > with consdev com,0x3f8,115200 > as well as the

Re: i386 9.99.17 build fails for NET4501 kernel

On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:31:08 +0100 Patrick Welche wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 04:31:08PM -0500, John D. Baker wrote: > > Building the NET4501 kernel with 9.99.17 sources fails with: > > > > [...] > > # compile NET4501/vm_machdep.o > >

Re: What to do with base X11 for netbsd-9 ?

* matthew green : > Lars Reichardt writes: > > > > > matthew green hat am 4. Juni 2019 um 07:19 > > > geschrieben: > > > > > > > > > unfortunately, you need the as-yet non-functional amdgpu driver > > > i believe: > > &g

re: What to do with base X11 for netbsd-9 ?

> matthew green hat am 4. Juni 2019 um 07:19 geschrieben: > > > unfortunately, you need the as-yet non-functional amdgpu driver > i believe: > > [ 1594.209] (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "OLAND" (ChipID =3D 0x6613) > > means a GCN v1. radeon supports this minimally, but the GL does > not. > >

Re: What to do with base X11 for netbsd-9 ?

* Robert Swindells : > > Lars Reichardt wrote: > >On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 09:35:02 +0200 > >Lars Reichardt wrote: > > > >> Hi there, > >> > >> for me netbsd-current as of yesterday with an upto date xsrc looks > >> stable (light desktop u

Re: X server being killed a lot

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:46:34 +0100 Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:18:01PM -0400, Michael wrote: > > I've had firefox starting to get swapped out ( and everything > > slowing to a crawl because of it ) while in active use, with more > > than half of RAM being used as file

Re: HEADS UP: drmkms update incoming

Thanks a lot for effort! On 8/27/18 6:37 PM, Taylor R Campbell wrote: > The drmkms update commit bomb is finished. I've compile-tested amd64, > i386, macppc, sparc64, and evbarm/TEGRA, and they all build. I'll be > around this evening US/Eastern to clean up fallout, of which I'm sure > there

Re: tools build failure?

I've seen that exact failure half a day ago.

Re: -current boot failure @ wm(4)

> Masanobu SAITOH hat am 18. Juli 2017 um 12:04 > geschrieben: > > > On 2017/07/14 13:34, Masanobu SAITOH wrote: > > Hi, Brad. > > > > On 2017/07/14 3:12, bch wrote: > >> Hello NetBSD. > >> > >> I think this maybe related to msaitoh@ work in ./sys/dev/pci/*wm*. > >> The