On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 08:30:17PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> On 2020/10/21 20:10, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> > Two days ago, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> > > This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> > > NetBSD test suite.
> > >
> > > The newly failing test cases
On 2020/10/21 20:10, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
Two days ago, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v0_8192
Two days ago, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
> sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v0_8192
> sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v1_16384
>
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v0_8192
sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v1_16384
sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v2_32768
On 16/10/2020 15:54, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_basic_ipv6_over_ipv4
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_basic_ipv6_over_ipv6
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_basic_ipv6_over_ipv4
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_basic_ipv6_over_ipv6
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_payload_sizes_ipv6_over_ipv4
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv4overipv4
net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv4overipv6
net/if_l2tp/t_l2tp:l2tp_basic_ipv6overipv4
On 14/10/2020 07:15, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
On Oct 8, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
The newly failing test cases are:
net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_halt_carpdevip
net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_halt_nocarpdevip
net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_ifdown_carpdevip
On Oct 8, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
> net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_halt_carpdevip
> net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_halt_nocarpdevip
> net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_ifdown_carpdevip
>
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
usr.bin/make/t_make:archive
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_halt_carpdevip
net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_halt_nocarpdevip
net/carp/t_basic:carp_handover_ipv4_ifdown_carpdevip
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/if_tap/t_tap:tap_bridged
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made
On 23/09/2020 11:42, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/if/t_ifconfig:ifconfig_options
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/if/t_ifconfig:ifconfig_options
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were
On 20/09/2020 04:40, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:02:45 +0100
From:Roy Marples
Message-ID: <51d2f8dc-d059-5eae-9899-5c91539d1...@marples.name>
| The test case just needed fixing.
That is not uncommon after changes elsewhere.
| The ping
Date:Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:02:45 +0100
From:Roy Marples
Message-ID: <51d2f8dc-d059-5eae-9899-5c91539d1...@marples.name>
| The test case just needed fixing.
That is not uncommon after changes elsewhere.
| The ping to an invalid address caused the ARP entry to
On 13/09/2020 23:10, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Sun, 13 Sep 2020 22:14:00 +0100
From:Roy Marples
Message-ID:
| >| > net/arp/t_arp:arp_proxy_arp_pub
| >| > net/arp/t_arp:arp_proxy_arp_pubproxy
| >
| > Those two are still failing.
|
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/ndp/t_ndp:ndp_rtm
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made between
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/arp/t_arp:arp_rtm
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 25 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made between
Date:Sun, 13 Sep 2020 22:14:00 +0100
From:Roy Marples
Message-ID:
| >| > net/arp/t_arp:arp_proxy_arp_pub
| >| > net/arp/t_arp:arp_proxy_arp_pubproxy
| >
| > Those two are still failing.
|
| Works fine on my box.
| Can you say how
On 13/09/2020 22:07, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:06:45 +0100
From:Roy Marples
Message-ID: <9e977478-d209-2dbb-49d9-3fa9acd25...@marples.name>
| > net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_10s
| > net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_5s
Date:Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:06:45 +0100
From:Roy Marples
Message-ID: <9e977478-d209-2dbb-49d9-3fa9acd25...@marples.name>
| > net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_10s
| > net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_5s
Those two are "fixed" (if you can call deleted
On 12/09/2020 22:57, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_10s
net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_5s
net/arp/t_arp:arp_command
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/arp/t_arp:arp_proxy_arp_pubproxy
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_10s
net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_5s
net/arp/t_arp:arp_command
net/arp/t_arp:arp_proxy_arp_pub
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/if_wg/t_misc:wg_malformed
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 25 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_basic_ipv4_over_ipv4
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_basic_ipv4_over_ipv6
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_multiple_interfaces
net/if_wg/t_basic:wg_multiple_peers
The NetBSD Test Fixture reported this test failure twice:
> net/net/t_unix:sockaddr_un_local_peereid
Sorry about the duplicate report. The testbed is now using Python 3
and that appears to have broken the duplicate suppression. I'll fix it.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/net/t_unix:sockaddr_un_local_peereid
The above test failed in each of the last 6 test runs, and passed in
at least 24 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/net/t_unix:sockaddr_un_local_peereid
The above test failed in each of the last 5 test runs, and passed in
at least 25 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
usr.bin/make/t_make:moderrs
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
share/mk/t_test:one_cxx
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
Between the last successful test and
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_ah_keys:ipsec_ah_keyedmd5_valid_keys
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_ah_keys:ipsec_ah_keyedsha1_valid_keys
Hi,
On 2020/06/19 21:04, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 08:56:32PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
I will make these tests (and similar ones in kernel/t_trapsignal) skipped on
QEMU, if there's no objection.
No objections from me.
Could you file a qemu bug for this, please?
Thank
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 08:56:32PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> I will make these tests (and similar ones in kernel/t_trapsignal) skipped on
> QEMU, if there's no objection.
No objections from me.
Could you file a qemu bug for this, please?
Thanks!
Martin
This seems due to QEMU bug, as also observed in
tests/lib/libc/gen/t_siginfo:sigfpe_flt, see:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/tests/lib/libc/gen/t_siginfo.c#rev1.20
Actually, these tests pass on
(1) VirtualBox, and
(2) real hardware under amd64 kernel with COMPAT_NETBSD32.
I will make
I will examine this.
Thanks,
rin
On 2020/06/19 19:28, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait3:traceme_crash_fpe
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait3:traceme_crash_fpe
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait3:traceme_signalignored_crash_fpe
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait3:traceme_signalmasked_crash_fpe
> On 16. Jun 2020, at 12:42, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
>
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
>fs/vfs/t_full:nfs_fillfs
[snip]
>2020.06.14.23.38.25 kamil src/sys/rump/include/rump/rump.h,v
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
fs/vfs/t_full:nfs_fillfs
fs/vfs/t_io:nfs_extendfile
fs/vfs/t_io:nfs_extendfile_append
fs/vfs/t_io:nfs_holywrite
fs/vfs/t_io:nfs_overwrite512
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
dev/cgd/t_cgd_blowfish:cgd_bf_cbc_128_encblkno8
dev/cgd/t_cgd_blowfish:cgd_bf_cbc_448_encblkno8
The above tests failed in each of the last 5 test runs, and passed in
at
> On Jun 8, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 8, 2020, at 10:02 AM, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
>>
>> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
>> NetBSD test suite.
>>
>> The newly failing test cases are:
>>
>>
> On Jun 8, 2020, at 10:02 AM, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
>
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
>net/if/t_ifconfig:ifconfig_description
>sbin/gpt/t_gpt:backup_2part
I think this is just a
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/if/t_ifconfig:ifconfig_description
sbin/gpt/t_gpt:backup_2part
The above tests failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
fs/ffs/t_miscquota:npsnapshot_unconf_user
fs/ffs/t_miscquota:npsnapshot_user
fs/ffs/t_miscquota:psnapshot_unconf_user
fs/ffs/t_miscquota:psnapshot_user
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
rump/rumpkern/t_sp:signal
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_natt:ipsec_natt_transport_ipv4_null
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_natt:ipsec_natt_transport_ipv4_rijndaelcbc
The above tests failed in each of the last 4 test
Fixed, thanks!
christos
> On May 22, 2020, at 4:15 AM, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
>
> Christos,
>
> On May 18, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
>> The newly failing test cases are:
>>
>>atf/atf-c/detail/fs_test:mkdtemp_err
>>atf/atf-c/detail/fs_test:mkstemp_err
>>
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
atf/atf-c/detail/fs_test:mkdtemp_err
atf/atf-c/detail/fs_test:mkstemp_err
bin/cp/t_cp:dir_to_dir
fs/vfs/t_unpriv:ext2fs_owner
fs/vfs/t_unpriv:ext2fs_times
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_ah_keys:ipsec_ah_aesxcbcmac_invalid_keys
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_ah_keys:ipsec_ah_hmacmd5_invalid_keys
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
> dev/audio/t_audio:AUDIO_ERROR_RDWR
> dev/audio/t_audio:AUDIO_ERROR_WRONLY
[and many more]
That message got stuck somewhere
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
dev/audio/t_audio:AUDIO_ERROR_RDWR
dev/audio/t_audio:AUDIO_ERROR_WRONLY
dev/audio/t_audio:AUDIO_GETENC_error
dev/audio/t_audio:AUDIO_GETENC_range
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
usr.bin/make/t_make:varmod_edge
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were
There are actually now more than 2,000 failing test cases in total,
but the email message reporting most of them has failed to appear on
current-users, perhaps because of its size.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/if_pppoe/t_pppoe:pppoe6_chap
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 21 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
fs/vfs/t_mtime_otrunc:puffs_otrunc_mtime_update
net/if_vlan/t_vlan:vlan_vlanid6
The above tests failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 23
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
fs/vfs/t_full:nfs_fillfs
net/if_ipsec/t_ipsec_natt:ipsecif_natt_transport_null
The above tests failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 24
Date:Fri, 24 Apr 2020 19:59:31 + (UTC)
From:NetBSD Test Fixture
Message-ID: <158775837076.23438.17159050926672197...@babylon5.netbsd.org>
| The newly failing test cases are:
|
| usr.bin/printf/t_builtin:A_floats
| usr.bin/printf/t_command:A_floats
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
bin/cp/t_cp:file_to_file
lib/librumphijack/t_sh:runscript
lib/librumphijack/t_vfs:cpcopy
lib/librumphijack/t_vfs:mv_x
The above tests failed in each of the last
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:32:18AM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> The NetBSD Test Fixture sent three reports listing the following
> groups of commits, respectively:
>
> >2020.04.16.14.39.58 joerg src/lib/libc/gen/pthread_atfork.c,v 1.13
> >2020.04.16.14.39.58 joerg
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 01:09:52AM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
> lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:fork10
> lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:fork2
>
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:unrelated_tracer_fork10
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait6:unrelated_tracer_fork12
The above tests failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and
The NetBSD Test Fixture sent three reports listing the following
groups of commits, respectively:
>2020.04.16.14.39.58 joerg src/lib/libc/gen/pthread_atfork.c,v 1.13
>2020.04.16.14.39.58 joerg src/libexec/ld.elf_so/rtld.c,v 1.204
>2020.04.16.14.39.58 joerg
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:fork16
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:unrelated_tracer_fork14
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait6:fork12
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait6:fork16
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_waitid:fork10
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:fork10
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:fork2
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:fork4
lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait4:fork6
NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
> fs/puffs/t_basic:root_chrdev
> fs/puffs/t_basic:root_fifo
> fs/puffs/t_basic:root_lnk
(etc)
These are already reported in
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
fs/puffs/t_basic:root_chrdev
fs/puffs/t_basic:root_fifo
fs/puffs/t_basic:root_lnk
fs/puffs/t_basic:root_reg
fs/puffs/t_fuzz:mountfuzz8
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_10s
net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_expiration_5s
net/arp/t_arp:arp_cache_overwriting
net/arp/t_arp:arp_command
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/if_bridge/t_bridge:bridge_member_ipv6
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 20 consecutive runs before that.
The following
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_misc:ipsec_lifetime_ipv6_esp_rijndaelcbc
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_misc:ipsec_spi_esp_null_preferred_new_delete
The above tests failed in each of the last 4
On 31/03/2020 12:22, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
The newly failing test case is:
usr.bin/infocmp/t_terminfo:basic
This error in infocmp is now fixed.
Roy
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
usr.bin/infocmp/t_terminfo:basic
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 26 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
kernel/t_filedesc:getfilerace
kernel/t_rnd:RNDADDDATA
kernel/t_rnd:RNDADDDATA2
kernel/t_rnd:read_random
The above tests failed in each of the last 4 test runs,
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
crypto/libcrypto/t_libcrypto:bn
net/arp/t_arp:arp_purge_on_route_change
net/arp/t_arp:arp_purge_on_route_delete
net/icmp/t_icmp6_redirect:icmp6_redirect_basic
Probably mine - working on it
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
dev/sysmon/t_swsensor:alarm_sensor
dev/sysmon/t_swsensor:entropy_interrupt_sensor
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
dev/sysmon/t_swsensor:alarm_sensor
dev/sysmon/t_swsensor:entropy_interrupt_sensor
dev/sysmon/t_swsensor:entropy_polled_sensor
dev/sysmon/t_swsensor:limit_sensor
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/ndp/t_ndp:ndp_rtm
The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made between
This morning, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> The newly failing test case is:
>
> net/if_ipsec/t_ipsec_natt:ipsecif_natt_transport_rijndaelcbc
>
> The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
> at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
>
> The following commits were
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/if_ipsec/t_ipsec_natt:ipsecif_natt_transport_rijndaelcbc
The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/if_vlan/t_vlan:vlan_multicast
net/if_vlan/t_vlan:vlan_multicast6
The above tests failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
rump/rumpkern/t_vm:uvmwait
The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits were made
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
usr.bin/awk/t_awk:period
usr.bin/awk/t_awk:regex_caret_2_rs
usr.bin/awk/t_awk:string1
The above tests failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
fs/vfs/t_mtime_otrunc:lfs_otrunc_mtime_update
fs/vfs/t_renamerace:lfs_renamerace
fs/vfs/t_renamerace:lfs_renamerace_dirs
fs/vfs/t_rmdirrace:lfs_race
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> The newly failing test case is:
>
> net/ipsec/t_ipsec_l2tp:ipsec_l2tp_ipv6_transport_ah_null
>
> The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
> at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
The fourth test run passed, so this looks like
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_l2tp:ipsec_l2tp_ipv6_transport_ah_null
The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
The
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
net/if_pppoe/t_pppoe:pppoe6_pap
net/if_pppoe/t_pppoe:pppoe_chap
The above tests failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs before
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> The newly failing test case is:
>
> net/ipsec/t_ipsec_tunnel:ipsec_tunnel_ipv4_ah_keyedmd5
>
> The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
> at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
>
> The following commits were made between the
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
net/ipsec/t_ipsec_tunnel:ipsec_tunnel_ipv4_ah_keyedmd5
The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
The
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 02:45:22AM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> The newly failing test case is:
>
> lib/libpthread/t_detach:pthread_detach
...
> 2020.01.27.20.50.05 ad src/lib/libpthread/pthread.c,v 1.157
Wrong error code from the kernel (ESRCH vs EINVAL) worked around with
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
lib/libpthread/t_detach:pthread_detach
The above test failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
usr.bin/vmstat/t_vmstat:default
usr.bin/vmstat/t_vmstat:opt_s
The above tests failed in each of the last 3 test runs, and passed in
at least 27 consecutive runs before
The remaining failures should be fixed by:
1.181 src/sys/rump/librump/rumpkern/vm.c
Cheers,
Andrew
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 01:26:42PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> I think this is likely fixed already but will take a look now.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 08:35:09AM +,
I think this is likely fixed already but will take a look now.
Andrew
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 08:35:09AM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:27:32PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:25:15AM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
>
> > This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> > NetBSD test suite.
> >
> > The newly failing test cases are:
> >
> >
Andrew Doran wrote:
> > sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v1_16384
> > sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v2_32768
> > sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow_swapped:grow_16M_v0_65536
> > sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow_swapped:grow_16M_v1_4096
> > sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow_swapped:grow_16M_v2_8192
> >
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:25:15AM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
> NetBSD test suite.
>
> The newly failing test cases are:
>
> fs/vfs/t_full:lfs_fillfs
> fs/vfs/t_io:lfs_extendfile
>
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote:
> The newly failing test case is:
>
> sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v0_8192
>
> The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
> at least 36 consecutive runs before that.
>
> The following commits were made between the last successful
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
fs/vfs/t_full:lfs_fillfs
fs/vfs/t_io:lfs_extendfile
fs/vfs/t_io:lfs_extendfile_append
fs/vfs/t_io:lfs_holywrite
fs/vfs/t_io:lfs_overwrite512
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test case is:
sbin/resize_ffs/t_grow:grow_16M_v0_8192
The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in
at least 36 consecutive runs before that.
The following commits
101 - 200 of 401 matches
Mail list logo
