Hi,
I’ve stumbled upon this too with recently upgraded machine (to NetBSD 8.0_BETA
(GENERIC.201803261630Z))
Kernel RNG “5887 68 5” runs test FAILURE: too many runs of 1 1s (2691 >=2685)
cprng 5887 68 5: failed statistical RNG test
The difference here is that the machine also loses netw
Hi!
What's the plan with these kernel messages?
Kernel RNG "23504 8 17" runs test FAILURE: too many runs of 3 0s (726 >= 723)
cprng 23504 8 17: failed statistical RNG test
I think I understand what they want to do, but they have too many
false positives and spam the console.
Can w
Hello,
dmesg reported:
Kernel RNG 2105 0 2 runs test FAILURE: too many runs of 3 1s (728 723)
cprng 2105 0 2: failed statistical RNG test
Any ideas what could be the problem?
kernel version: NetBSD 7.99.9
distribution: netbsd-7 (version May 11)
Regards
Uwe
In article pine.neb.4.64.150520400.29...@6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de,
6b...@6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
Hello,
dmesg reported:
Kernel RNG 2105 0 2 runs test FAILURE: too many runs of 3 1s (728 723)
cprng 2105 0 2: failed statistical RNG test
Any ideas what could
Perhaps we could make the messages a little bit less frightening?
Perhaps s/FAILURE/NOTICE/
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article pine.neb.4.64.150520400.29...@6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de,
6b...@6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
Hello,
dmesg reported:
Kernel
On May 21, 5:46am, p...@vps1.whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Kernel RNG ???
| Perhaps we could make the messages a little bit less frightening?
|
| Perhaps s/FAILURE/NOTICE/
|
That's not a bad idea.
christos
Haven't see this in a while, so, fyi:
Kernel RNG 22663 3552 13 runs test FAILURE: too many runs of 3 0s (737 723)
cprng 22663 3552 13: failed statistical RNG test
$ uname -a
NetBSD kamloops 7.99.13 NetBSD 7.99.13 (GENERIC) #1186: Mon Apr 27
11:29:33 PDT 2015
root@kamloops:/usr/obj/sys/arch
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) writes:
In article 20150206073215.gb6...@mail.duskware.de,
Martin Husemann mar...@duskware.de wrote:
I see them too, a lot.
The message was hidden under some debug #define untill sometime last year,
when Christos enabled it by default.
I think the issue
I'm getting kernel msgs to the effect of:
Kernel RNG ... long run test FAILURE: Run of nn 0s found
Should I file a report for this, or is this a WIP, known issue, ???
-bch
For posterity (transcribed):
Kernel RNG 5118 2849 161 long run test FAILURE: Run of 27 0s found
cprng 5118 2849 161: failed statistical RNG test
Kernel RNG 5118 2997 5 long run test FAILURE: Run of 32 0s found
cprng 5118 2997 5: failed statistical RNG test
On 2/5/15, bch brad.har...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:53:17PM -0800, bch wrote:
For posterity (transcribed):
Kernel RNG 5118 2849 161 long run test FAILURE: Run of 27 0s found
cprng 5118 2849 161: failed statistical RNG test
Kernel RNG 5118 2997 5 long run test FAILURE: Run of 32 0s found
cprng 5118 2997 5: failed
11 matches
Mail list logo
