Re: 8.99.41 panic in nvm_poll

2019-06-10 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 05:38:56PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote: > On 2019/06/10 17:17, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > I tried some more stuff. > > > > Enabling the NVME_QUIRK_DELAY_B4_CHK_RDY quirk didn't help, it paniced > > during boot. However, forcing nvme_pci_force_intx to 1 makes it boot > >

Re: 8.99.41 panic in nvm_poll

2019-06-10 Thread Masanobu SAITOH
On 2019/06/10 17:17, Thomas Klausner wrote: > I tried some more stuff. > > Enabling the NVME_QUIRK_DELAY_B4_CHK_RDY quirk didn't help, it paniced > during boot. However, forcing nvme_pci_force_intx to 1 makes it boot > successfully! Please show the following information: - "FULL" dmesg

Re: 8.99.41 panic in nvm_poll

2019-06-10 Thread Thomas Klausner
I tried some more stuff. Enabling the NVME_QUIRK_DELAY_B4_CHK_RDY quirk didn't help, it paniced during boot. However, forcing nvme_pci_force_intx to 1 makes it boot successfully! Should this variable default to 1, or how do we improve the situation in general? Cheers, Thomas

Re: 8.99.41 panic in nvm_poll

2019-05-31 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 09:04:25AM +1000, Matthew Green wrote: > i have a change in testing that makes nvme mostly attach after interrupts > happen. i need it on arm64 where the interrupt controller isn't setup > properly yet and attemtping to setup affinity doesn't work. > > i wonder if this

re: 8.99.41 panic in nvm_poll

2019-05-28 Thread matthew green
i have a change in testing that makes nvme mostly attach after interrupts happen. i need it on arm64 where the interrupt controller isn't setup properly yet and attemtping to setup affinity doesn't work. i wonder if this would help here, since nvm_poll() would be called later. unfortunately, i