Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2023-03-14 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:40:18 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <167873641838.21770.3334724647239982...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 | build failure. | | The failure occurred on

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2023-01-08 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sat, 7 Jan 2023 20:41:01 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <167312406178.23291.2878684022518773...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, | using sources from CVS date 2023.01.07.19.41.30.

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2022-10-30 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sun, 30 Oct 2022 02:23:22 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <166709660251.4897.4957055195986461...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | An extract from the build.sh output follows: | | ./usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Rainy_River |

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-12-14 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The build is still failing, now with: --- release-bootcd-com --- Copying set gpufw pax: line 206: ./libdata/firmware/nouveau/nvidia/gp107/gr/fecs_bl.bin: type mismatch: specfile link, tree file This is from:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-09-26 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
Hi maya, The build is still failing with: > ./libdata/firmware/nouveau/nvidia/LICENCE.nvidia > ./libdata/firmware/nouveau/nvidia/gm206/fecs_data.bin > ./libdata/firmware/nouveau/nvidia/gm206/fecs_inst.bin > ./libdata/firmware/nouveau/nvidia/gm206/gpccs_data.bin >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-08-18 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
Yesterday, the NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > nbmake[3]: stopped in /tmp/build/2021.08.17.17.31.59-i386/src > nbmake[2]: stopped in /tmp/build/2021.08.17.17.31.59-i386/src > nbmake[1]: stopped in /tmp/build/2021.08.17.17.31.59-i386/src > nbmake: stopped in

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-08-08 Thread Dave B
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 11:51:57PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: ... > Or should I try with hg? I have devel/mercurial built and installed. > > Now to find a tutorial for Mercurial for git users: There was one, but I can > no longer find it. ... There's a related resource which isn't a tutorial

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-08-06 Thread David Holland
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:32:37AM +0200, Reinoud Zandijk wrote: > > > it looks like CVS randomly didn't commit some of my changes, > > > investigating... > > > > Yeah, not sure what happened; something caused it to, apparently, > > think a few of the files in the second changeset still

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-25 Thread Thomas Mueller
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 01:28:06AM +, David Holland wrote: > > that is... less than helpful :-( > > it looks like CVS randomly didn't commit some of my changes, > > investigating... > Yeah, not sure what happened; something caused it to, apparently, > think a few of the files in the

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-24 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
On Monday, David Holland wrote: > Right... I wonder what happened to bracket's error-matching script; it > usually does better than that. I have now deployed bracket 2.15 on babylon5.netbsd.org, and the latest build failure report looks much better:

make(1) enhancements (was Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure)

2021-07-22 Thread Reinoud Zandijk
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 08:13:19AM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > David Holland wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:32:20AM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote: > > > Logs below are usually more helpful. > > > > Right... I wonder what happened to bracket's error-matching script; it > > usually does

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-18 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
David Holland wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:32:20AM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote: > > Logs below are usually more helpful. > > Right... I wonder what happened to bracket's error-matching script; it > usually does better than that. There are multiple causes, but a major one is that since

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-18 Thread Rin Okuyama
On 2021/07/19 10:28, David Holland wrote: that is... less than helpful :-( it looks like CVS randomly didn't commit some of my changes, investigating... Logs below are usually more helpful. On 2021/07/19 9:42, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: Logs can be found at:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-07-18 Thread David Holland
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:42:49AM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, > using sources from CVS date 2021.07.18.23.57.34. > > An

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-05-27 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <24751.41935.824926.178...@guava.gson.org>, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: >The i386 build is still failing, but now with a different error: > > --- in6_pcb.o --- > /tmp/build/2021.05.27.08.58.29-i386/src/sys/netinet6/in6_pcb.c: In >function 'in6_pcblookup_port': > cc1: error: function

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-05-27 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article , Christos Zoulas wrote: >In article <24751.41935.824926.178...@guava.gson.org>, >Andreas Gustafsson wrote: >>The i386 build is still failing, but now with a different error: >> >> --- in6_pcb.o --- >> /tmp/build/2021.05.27.08.58.29-i386/src/sys/netinet6/in6_pcb.c: In >>function

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-05-27 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <24751.41935.824926.178...@guava.gson.org>, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: >The i386 build is still failing, but now with a different error: > > --- in6_pcb.o --- > /tmp/build/2021.05.27.08.58.29-i386/src/sys/netinet6/in6_pcb.c: In >function 'in6_pcblookup_port': > cc1: error: function

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-05-27 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The i386 build is still failing, but now with a different error: --- in6_pcb.o --- /tmp/build/2021.05.27.08.58.29-i386/src/sys/netinet6/in6_pcb.c: In function 'in6_pcblookup_port': cc1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-04-18 Thread Christos Zoulas
Fixed... christos > On Apr 18, 2021, at 9:39 AM, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > > The i386 build is still failing, with errors like these: > > --- dependall-tmux --- > > /tmp/build/2021.04.18.12.05.29-i386/src/external/bsd/tmux/dist/cmd-display-menu.c: > In function

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-04-18 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The i386 build is still failing, with errors like these: --- dependall-tmux --- /tmp/build/2021.04.18.12.05.29-i386/src/external/bsd/tmux/dist/cmd-display-menu.c: In function 'cmd_display_menu_get_position':

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-04-06 Thread jkoshy
> This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, > using sources from CVS date 2021.04.06.20.13.43. ... > *** Failed target: dependall-../external/bsd/elftoolchain ... > The following

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-15 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sun, 14 Feb 2021 21:40:21 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <161333882137.19912.5576154194224308...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 | build failure. | | The failure occurred on

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-03 Thread Ryo ONODERA
Hi, Roy Marples writes: > On 03/02/2021 17:55, Ryo ONODERA wrote: >> Exactly. It happens in dtrace userland build. > > Fixed. Sorry about that. > > Maybe we should not define CTASSERT ourselves and just use __CTASSERT to > avoid > this in the future? Thank you. I have no idea what is the

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-03 Thread Roy Marples
On 03/02/2021 17:55, Ryo ONODERA wrote: Exactly. It happens in dtrace userland build. Fixed. Sorry about that. Maybe we should not define CTASSERT ourselves and just use __CTASSERT to avoid this in the future? Roy

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-03 Thread Ryo ONODERA
Hi, Martin Husemann writes: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 05:31:11PM +, Roy Marples wrote: >> I cannot replicate this? >> I'm just building a stock kernel - what extra options do I need? > > It happens in the userland build. Exactly. It happens in dtrace userland build. > Martin -- Ryo

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-03 Thread Martin Husemann
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 05:31:11PM +, Roy Marples wrote: > I cannot replicate this? > I'm just building a stock kernel - what extra options do I need? It happens in the userland build. Martin

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-03 Thread Roy Marples
On 03/02/2021 14:42, Ryo ONODERA wrote: Hi, It seems that CTASSERT in netinet/in.h conflicts with CTASSERT in external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/sys/debug.h. Ryo ONODERA writes: Hi, However I have gotten another failure: --- dt_print.pico --- In file included from

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-03 Thread Ryo ONODERA
Hi, It seems that CTASSERT in netinet/in.h conflicts with CTASSERT in external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/sys/debug.h. Ryo ONODERA writes: > Hi, > > However I have gotten another failure: > > --- dt_print.pico --- > In file included from /usr/src/external/cddl/osnet/sys/sys/debug.h:51, >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-03 Thread Ryo ONODERA
Hi, However I have gotten another failure: --- dt_print.pico --- In file included from /usr/src/external/cddl/osnet/sys/sys/debug.h:51, from /usr/src/external/cddl/osnet/sys/sys/uio.h:64, from /usr/world/9.99/amd64/dest/usr/include/sys/socket.h:99,

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-02-03 Thread Ryo ONODERA
Hi, NetBSD Test Fixture writes: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, > using sources from CVS date 2021.02.03.12.11.34. > > An extract from the build.sh output follows: > >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-25 Thread Martin Husemann
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 12:10:46PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > > On Jan 24, 2021, at 11:31 AM, Robert Elz wrote: > > > > /tmp/build/2021.01.24.17.44.16-i386/tools/lib/gcc/i486--netbsdelf/9.3.0/../../../../i486--netbsdelf/bin/ld: > >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-24 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Jan 24, 2021, at 5:38 PM, Robert Elz wrote: > >Date:Sun, 24 Jan 2021 16:25:55 -0800 >From:Jason Thorpe >Message-ID: > > | > If would be nice if rump weren't so bloody fragile. > > It would indeed. > > | I am not able to reproduce the build failure: > >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-24 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sun, 24 Jan 2021 16:25:55 -0800 From:Jason Thorpe Message-ID: | > If would be nice if rump weren't so bloody fragile. It would indeed. | I am not able to reproduce the build failure: Odd, it is still failing on b5, on all of i386 amd64 and evbarm (the

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-24 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Jan 24, 2021, at 12:10 PM, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > >> On Jan 24, 2021, at 11:31 AM, Robert Elz wrote: >> >> /tmp/build/2021.01.24.17.44.16-i386/tools/lib/gcc/i486--netbsdelf/9.3.0/../../../../i486--netbsdelf/bin/ld: >> /tmp/build/2021.01.24.17.44.16-i386/destdir/usr/lib/librump.so:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-24 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:45:38 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <161151393856.1140.6101421274186394...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | An extract from the build.sh output follows: The actual error lines (with intervening unrelated stuff deleted) are: #

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-24 Thread Roland Illig
On 23.01.2021 19:34, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2021.01.23.17.58.03. An extract from the build.sh output follows:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-21 Thread Martin Husemann
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 04:33:40PM +0100, Reinoud Zandijk wrote: > I'd like to fix this ASAP but what is the correct way of dealing with this? Is > this an i386 failure or should code just not use bus_space_read_8() or > bus_space_write_8() ? Unless the spec requires it, you should just avoid

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-21 Thread Reinoud Zandijk
I'd like to fix this ASAP but what is the correct way of dealing with this? Is this an i386 failure or should code just not use bus_space_read_8() or bus_space_write_8() ? In the VirtIO case, it doesn't have to be written atomically though. What I could do is define a bus_space_write_8()

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-21 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Wed, 20 Jan 2021 21:17:40 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <161117746032.12857.1128493575446...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 | build failure. | | The failure occurred on

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2021-01-03 Thread Roland Illig
On 03.01.2021 21:00, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2021.01.03.19.15.36. An extract from the build.sh output follows:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-12-19 Thread Rin Okuyama
Sorry for breakage. I'll fix this. rin On 2020/12/19 17:40, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2020.12.19.07.19.30. An

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-12-07 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
Roland Illig wrote: > >=== 2 extra files in DESTDIR = > Fixed in distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi 1.984. Confirmed fixed, thanks. The i386 build is still failing, though - it's now back to failing in mpu_acpi.c: --- kern-GENERIC ---

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-12-06 Thread Roland Illig
On 07.12.2020 07:42, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: The build is now failing differently: === 2 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? --

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-12-06 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The build is now failing differently: === 2 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? -- ./usr/tests/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/opt-keep-going-multiple.exp

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-12-06 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > nbmake[2]: stopped in > /tmp/build/2020.12.06.12.54.32-i386/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/LEGACY More specifically: --- mpu_acpi.o --- /tmp/build/2020.12.06.12.23.13-i386/src/sys/dev/acpi/mpu_acpi.c: In function 'mpu_acpi_attach':

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-11-13 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > The build is now failing with: Ah, sorry there's some step I missed > > === 2 extra files in DESTDIR = > Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. > File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-11-13 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > The build is now failing with: Hopefully fixed now. > > === 2 extra files in DESTDIR = > Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. > File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? > -- >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-11-13 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The build is now failing with: === 2 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? -- ./usr/tests/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/objdir-writable.exp

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-11-13 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The build is still failing, but now with a different error: nbmake[5]: "/tmp/build/2020.11.13.08.33.07-i386/src/external/ofl/Makefile" line 3: Malformed conditional (${MKX11} != "no") -- Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-11-09 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > nbmake[7]: nbmake[7]: don't know how to make -ltermlib. Stop The build is still failing. The problems started with this commit: 2020.11.08.21.56.47 nia src/external/bsd/kyua-cli/Makefile.inc,v 1.8 2020.11.08.21.56.47 nia

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-11-04 Thread Paul Goyette
Should be fixed now... On Wed, 4 Nov 2020, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2020.11.04.18.12.19. An extract from the

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-11-04 Thread Paul Goyette
Working on it ... On Wed, 4 Nov 2020, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2020.11.04.18.12.19. An extract from the build.sh

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-10-30 Thread Martin Husemann
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 03:02:16PM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote: > On 2020/10/30 2:10, Rin Okuyama wrote: > > On 2020/10/30 1:58, nia wrote: > > > It should be fixed already. > > > > Please also try build for sun2, which does not support shlib; > > All programs linked to libsqlite3 need -lm

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-10-30 Thread Rin Okuyama
On 2020/10/30 2:10, Rin Okuyama wrote: On 2020/10/30 1:58, nia wrote: It should be fixed already. Please also try build for sun2, which does not support shlib; All programs linked to libsqlite3 need -lm explicitly. Periodic build for sun2 and vax is broken due to the sqlite3 change:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-10-29 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
nia wrote: > It should be fixed already. It's not, it's now failing earlier in the build: http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/i386/commits-2020.10.html#2020.10.29.16.35.33 -- Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-10-29 Thread Robert Elz
Yes, your commit message arrived here while I was typing the message containing my (obviously incorrect, and now discarded) patch, along with the rant. kre

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-10-29 Thread Rin Okuyama
On 2020/10/30 1:58, nia wrote: It should be fixed already. Please also try build for sun2, which does not support shlib; All programs linked to libsqlite3 need -lm explicitly. Thanks, rin

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-10-29 Thread nia
It should be fixed already.

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-10-29 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:53:25 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <160398680587.14474.16594358311982355...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | /tmp/build/2020.10.29.12.38.06-i386/tools/lib/gcc/i486--netbsdelf/9.3.0/../../../../i486--netbsdelf/bin/ld:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-09-12 Thread Roy Marples
On 12/09/2020 07:40, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2020.09.12.01.36.26. An extract from the build.sh output follows:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-08-09 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > --- kern-XEN3PAE_DOMU --- > *** [netbsd] Error code 1 > nbmake[2]: stopped in > /tmp/bracket/build/2020.08.09.11.04.05-i386/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/XEN3PAE_DOMU Specifically: --- kern-XEN3PAE_DOMU ---

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-07-26 Thread Taylor R Campbell
> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:20:05 +0300 > From: Andreas Gustafsson > > The build is still failing, current error as of 2020.07.26.09.17.24: > > === 1 extra files in DESTDIR = > Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. > File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-07-26 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The build is still failing, current error as of 2020.07.26.09.17.24: === 1 extra files in DESTDIR = Files in DESTDIR but missing from flist. File is obsolete or flist is out of date ? --

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-07-19 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
> I just committed usr.bin/make/var.c r1.270 which seems to fix > everything. Confirmed. Thanks for a quick response. --- Izumi Tsutsui

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-07-19 Thread Roland Illig
On 19.07.2020 19:34, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > The build is still broken as of source date 2020.07.19.16.22.44: > > > http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/i386/commits-2020.07.html#2020.07.19.16.22.44 I'm sorry, I should have had a build running in parallel to my changes all the time. I just

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-07-19 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The build is still broken as of source date 2020.07.19.16.22.44: http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/i386/commits-2020.07.html#2020.07.19.16.22.44 -- Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-07-03 Thread Paul Goyette
This has already been fixed - thanks, Roy! On Fri, 3 Jul 2020, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2020.07.03.11.03.42. An

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Luke Mewburn
On 20-06-21 13:21, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: | Luke, | | You wrote: | > I think I've fixed it with 2 follow up commits in tests/lib | | There's a new error: | | http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/i386/2020/2020.06.21.08.02.43/build.log.tail | | -- | Andreas

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > I'll change bracket to look for that and see how it works. > > > BTW if this behavior change is a problem for your automation, you can > > disable it by setting .MAKE.DIE_QUIETLY=no > > That would be counter to my principle of testing with default settings. Sure,

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > > It would be helpful for both human and robotic users if error messages > > > consistently included the word "error", or if there was some other easy > > > way of identifying them in the build log. > > > > The regex 'make.*stopped' is the

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > It would be helpful for both human and robotic users if error messages > > consistently included the word "error", or if there was some other easy > > way of identifying them in the build log. > > The regex 'make.*stopped' is the best clue to look for since it will >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > Martin pointed me to this error some 63 lines from the end of the log: > > --- dependall-tests --- > nbmake[7]: nbmake[7]: don't know how to make t_cabsl.cc. Stop > > I think the reason I didn't find it myself is

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Hi Andreas The failure is: --- dependall-tests --- dependall ===> tests/lib/libm --- dependall-tests --- nbmake[7]: nbmake[7]: don't know how to make t_cabsl.cc. Stop .. --- dependall-tests --- nbmake[7]: stopped in /tmp/bracket/build/2020.06.21.03.39.21-i386/src/tests/lib/libm btw the log

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Luke Mewburn
Thanks for the heads up. I think I've fixed it with 2 follow up commits in tests/lib Cheers, Luke > On 21 Jun 2020, at 19:10, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > > Martin pointed me to this error some 63 lines from the end of the log: > > --- dependall-tests --- > nbmake[7]: nbmake[7]: don't know

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Martin Husemann
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 12:00:41PM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > Martin pointed me to this error some 63 lines from the end of the log: > > --- dependall-tests --- > nbmake[7]: nbmake[7]: don't know how to make t_cabsl.cc. Stop > > I think the reason I didn't find it myself is that I

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
Martin pointed me to this error some 63 lines from the end of the log: --- dependall-tests --- nbmake[7]: nbmake[7]: don't know how to make t_cabsl.cc. Stop I think the reason I didn't find it myself is that I have developed a habit of searching for the message "Error code 1" (or similar

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-21 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, > using sources from CVS date 2020.06.21.03.39.21. > > The following commits were made between the last

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-06-18 Thread Roy Marples
On 12/06/2020 16:13, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 build failure. The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, using sources from CVS date 2020.06.12.11.21.36. An extract from the build.sh output follows:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-05-21 Thread Andrew Doran
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:07:52AM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, > using sources from CVS date 2020.05.21.21.12.31. ... > ---

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-05-16 Thread maya
I am using this diff but I am not sure what I am doing. Index: tests/rump/modautoload/Makefile === RCS file: /cvsroot/src/tests/rump/modautoload/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 Makefile ---

re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-04-19 Thread matthew green
Andrew Doran writes: > Doesn't show up in Opengrok, maybe it dislikes rump. Already fixed. opengrok is missing massive portions of src, please don't rely upon it to find "all" of anything. ... or can we have it fixed please? :) (grep -r across 'src' is really fast on a modern system when it's

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-04-19 Thread Andrew Doran
Doesn't show up in Opengrok, maybe it dislikes rump. Already fixed. Andrew On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 09:56:55PM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-04-17 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Fri, 17 Apr 2020 14:08:27 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <158713250771.23564.16282845902177835...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, | using sources from CVS date 2020.04.17.11.21.06.

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-04-10 Thread Jaromír Doleček
Fix committed. The compiler was correct - I reused code around frame_list from setup, didn't notice the type is different. Thank yo. Jaromir Le ven. 10 avr. 2020 à 22:35, Robert Elz a écrit : > > Date:Thu, 9 Apr 2020 22:24:47 + (UTC) > From:NetBSD Test Fixture >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-04-10 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 9 Apr 2020 22:24:47 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <158647108721.6125.11585167398565454...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 | build failure. The i386 build remains broken since

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-04-04 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
On 05.04.2020 01:14, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, > using sources from CVS date 2020.04.04.21.36.15. > > An extract from the build.sh output

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-04-03 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > --- dependall-gdb --- > > CC=/tmp/bracket/build/2020.04.02.11.52.41-i386/tools/bin/i486--netbsdelf-c++ > /tmp/bracket/build/2020.04.02.11.52.41-i386/tools/bin/nbmkdep -f maint.d.tmp > -- -std=gnu++11 >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-04-02 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:09:14 + (UTC) From:NetBSD Test Fixture Message-ID: <158583655484.15292.8162724620486601...@babylon5.netbsd.org> | An extract from the build.sh output follows: | | #create libgdb/maint.d | --- dependall-gcc --- |

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-26 Thread Andrew Doran
Fixed with 1.18 src/sys/rump/librump/rumpkern/sleepq.c Apologies, forgot to commit earlier. Andrew On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:36:27PM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-22 Thread Andrew Doran
Fixed with src/sys/kern/vfs_vnode.c 1.115. Andrew On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 04:23:47PM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, > using sources

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-14 Thread Andrew Doran
Should be fixed with 1.91 src/sys/miscfs/genfs/genfs_io.c. Andrew On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 07:46:02PM +, NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a NetBSD-current/i386 > build failure. > > The failure occurred on babylon5.netbsd.org, a NetBSD/amd64 host, >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-07 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
On 07.03.2020 20:43, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: >> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors >> *** [t_ptrace_wait.o] Error code 1 > > The compiler error message did not appare because it was too far > back from the end of the build log (5149 lines): > >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-07 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > *** [t_ptrace_wait.o] Error code 1 The compiler error message did not appare because it was too far back from the end of the build log (5149 lines): --- dependall-sys ---

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-03 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <20200303122717.gb...@mail.duskware.de>, Martin Husemann wrote: >On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 01:29:39PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: >> Would it be too much to ask that imports of entire new subsystems like >> this be at least build tested with "build.sh release"? > >The lossage in

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-03 Thread Martin Husemann
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 01:29:39PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > Would it be too much to ask that imports of entire new subsystems like > this be at least build tested with "build.sh release"? The lossage in this case seems to depend on -j values and whether you do incremental builds, so not

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-03 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > *** [cleandir-pamu2fcfg] Error code 2 > nbmake[7]: stopped in > /tmp/bracket/build/2020.03.03.00.47.33-i386/src/external/bsd/pam-u2f/bin The build is still broken as of source date 2020.03.03.08.56.05:

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-03-01 Thread Jason Thorpe
> On Mar 1, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Andrius V wrote: > > Hi, > > Was the build failure noticed? Seems like this commit is at fault: > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/pci/if_stge.c.diff?r1=1.79=1.80_with_tag=MAIN=h > Working on this now. > ../../../../dev/pci/if_stge.c: In

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-02-29 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > *** [hifn7751.o] Error code 1 > nbmake[8]: stopped in > /tmp/bracket/build/2020.02.29.11.03.44-i386/src/sys/modules/hifn Specifically: --- dependall-hifn --- In file included from

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-02-27 Thread Rares Aioanei
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 09:18:59AM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > > nbmake[8]: nbmake[8]: don't know how to make libpam_echo.so.. Stop > > This was fixed but the build is still broken as of 2020.02.27.03.25.08: > > # link rescue/rescue > [...] >

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

2020-02-26 Thread Andreas Gustafsson
The NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > nbmake[8]: nbmake[8]: don't know how to make libpam_echo.so.. Stop This was fixed but the build is still broken as of 2020.02.27.03.25.08: # link rescue/rescue [...]

  1   2   3   >