Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-09-04 Thread Greg Troxel
Chavdar Ivanov writes: > Yes, it was replacing cmake at the time, which eventually needed libxslt. In that case your choice is to fix the real issue first, work around with a large number of -X, or use -k and see what gets done. >> I don't know what's going on, and would suggest turning on set

Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-09-01 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, Greg Troxel wrote: Riccardo Mottola writes: the man page for pkg_rr asks that people not report "some make replace that pkg_rr did failed" as a pkg_rr problem, because it's not really true but mostly because the subset of peopel that don't like pkg_rr then ignore your report, whereas some o

Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-08-31 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 14:14, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Chavdar Ivanov writes: > > > > > --- > > ===> Building binary package for libxslt-1.1.38nb1 > > => Creating binary package /usr/pkgsrc/packages/All/libxslt-1.1.38nb1.tgz > > ===> Installing binary package of libxslt-1.1.38nb1 > > pkg_add: A dif

Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-08-31 Thread Greg Troxel
Chavdar Ivanov writes: > > --- > ===> Building binary package for libxslt-1.1.38nb1 > => Creating binary package /usr/pkgsrc/packages/All/libxslt-1.1.38nb1.tgz > ===> Installing binary package of libxslt-1.1.38nb1 > pkg_add: A different version of libxslt-1.1.38nb1 is already > installed: libxslt

Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-08-31 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
While on the topic of pkg_rr, if I'm permitted to cut in, I have been getting strange errors suggesting a problem with the topological order of replacement perhaps: --- ===> Building binary package for libxslt-1.1.38nb1 => Creating binary package /usr/pkgsrc/packages/All/libxslt-1.1.38nb1.tgz ===>

Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-08-30 Thread Greg Troxel
Riccardo Mottola writes: > Hi, > > Greg Troxel wrote: >> did you cd to devel/scons (or really the PKGPATH of the installed pkg) >> and type "make replace". The pkg_rr man page says, or should say, to do >> that, and then to deal with that error as if it were not from pkg_rr. > > no, I didn't...

Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-08-30 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, Riccardo Mottola wrote: In fact at the moment I have this one installed, according to pkg_info py310-scons-3.1.2nb4 Python-based, open-source build system so I suppose pkg_rr was right trying to subdtitute the py3 version right now I found that py310-scons could be removed without bre

Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-08-30 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, Greg Troxel wrote: did you cd to devel/scons (or really the PKGPATH of the installed pkg) and type "make replace". The pkg_rr man page says, or should say, to do that, and then to deal with that error as if it were not from pkg_rr. no, I didn't... I thought to have encountered some weird

Re: ERROR: No valid Python version

2023-08-29 Thread Greg Troxel
Riccardo Mottola writes: > Hi, > > pkg_rolling-replace of current pksgrc on 10.99.7 stops with this error: > > RR> Replacing py310-scons-3.1.2nb4 > ===> Cleaning for none-scons-3.1.2nb7 > ERROR: This package has set PKG_FAIL_REASON: > ERROR: No valid Python version > *** Error code 1 did you cd