Thomas Klausner writes:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:24:33AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> That's not entirely clear. In theory programs that use that, rather
>> than how SANE has changed, might still want it. Whether there are any
>> such programs that any actual user wants
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Gary Duzan wrote:
=>Dave Tyson writes:
=>
=>> I note that PR 50340 has been closed and with the latest pkgsrc
=>>under current (amd64) my Mustek 1200 UB scanner seems to work OK
=>>- but I have comment out the uscanner device in the kernel and use
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:24:33AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> That's not entirely clear. In theory programs that use that, rather
> than how SANE has changed, might still want it. Whether there are any
> such programs that any actual user wants to use is unclear.
Do you know any such
Nick Hudson writes:
> On 03/19/16 19:12, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> Martin Husemann writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 07:17:50PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
I think we should disable uscanner in GENERIC now. I have been doing
that on my own
On 03/19/16 19:12, Greg Troxel wrote:
Martin Husemann writes:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 07:17:50PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
I think we should disable uscanner in GENERIC now. I have been doing
that on my own systems for years, as uscanner has never worked for me.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 05:12:11PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > The ACL would be evaluated in addition to filesystem
> > permissions and would match attributes like class/vendor/product/serial/...
> > The driver and/or a sysctl setting could determine how an empty
> > ACL is handled,
Martin Husemann writes:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 07:17:50PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
>> I think we should disable uscanner in GENERIC now. I have been doing
>> that on my own systems for years, as uscanner has never worked for me.
>> The permissions issues can be
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 07:17:50PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> I think we should disable uscanner in GENERIC now. I have been doing
> that on my own systems for years, as uscanner has never worked for me.
> The permissions issues can be fixed later.
I agree.
Martin
Dave Tyson writes:
> I note that PR 50340 has been closed and with the latest pkgsrc under current
> (amd64) my Mustek 1200 UB scanner seems to work OK - but I have comment out
> the uscanner device in the kernel and use it as a ugen device. It seems that
> this is the
Do people think that solving the permissions issue should be related to
disabling uscanner in */GENERIC? Here's the list of what I'd change:
./alpha/conf/GENERIC:uscanner* at uhub? port ?
./amd64/conf/GENERIC:uscanner* at uhub? port ?
./amd64/conf/XEN3_DOM0:uscanner* at uhub? port ?
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 03:12:08PM +0100, Michael van Elst wrote:
> Changing ownerships of the filesystem entries isn't sufficient.
> After all some ugen* can be changed quickly.
I expected devpubd to deal with that for us - not sure what you mean
here.
> I'd prefer either some separate ACLs
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:29:09AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 08:45:59AM +, Michael van Elst wrote:
> > That's a can of worms. You don't even know what a particular ugen*
> > device is until you opened and queried it.
>
> Here is my original suggestion:
>
>
Date:Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:48:07 -0400
From:"Gary Duzan"
Message-ID: <20160319004807.2b63d115...@xen1.duzan.org>
| In Message ,
|Greg Troxel wrote:
| =>Perhaps if we had something called
mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) writes:
>I tried to get the non-libusb (i.e. uscanner0) version to work with latest
>sane-backends, but failed.
Does it work in FreeBSD (with /dev/usb/scanner0) ?
>Instead we should improve our device ownership handling in a more
>general way. Jared
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 09:04:32PM +, Dave Tyson wrote:
> I am of the same opinion as the PR originator that it is easier to control
> access permissions with a uscanner device rather than having to open up a
> whole raft of ugen devices, but I guess the sane developers feel that using
>
In Message ,
Greg Troxel wrote:
=>Dave Tyson writes:
=>
=>> I note that PR 50340 has been closed and with the latest pkgsrc
=>>under current (amd64) my Mustek 1200 UB scanner seems to work OK
=>>- but I have comment out
16 matches
Mail list logo