On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 02:00:31PM -, Michael van Elst wrote:
> bou...@antioche.eu.org (Manuel Bouyer) writes:
>
> >But the clock softint shouldn't be locked out for 16s, ever.
>
> Then the clock softint must have a higher priority than
> everything else including hard interrupts.
>
>
bou...@antioche.eu.org (Manuel Bouyer) writes:
>But the clock softint shouldn't be locked out for 16s, ever.
Then the clock softint must have a higher priority than
everything else including hard interrupts.
Obviously that's not how the system is designed, there
are no limits on how long
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 09:19:04AM -, Michael van Elst wrote:
> mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) writes:
>
> >On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:17:58PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
> >> I think it would be good to change the default behavior from
> >> panic to something others because GENERIC
mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) writes:
>On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:17:58PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
>> I think it would be good to change the default behavior from
>> panic to something others because GENERIC kernel enables HEARTBEAT.
>> by default. One of idea is to print warning
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:17:58PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
> I think it would be good to change the default behavior from
> panic to something others because GENERIC kernel enables HEARTBEAT.
> by default. One of idea is to print warning message at sufficient intervals.
I disagree. It is
