Should we have a list of kernel grovelling pkgsrc packages we are
interested in keeping working? lsof, xosview...
Definitely not a "these must keep working they way they currently do",
or even "these must remain able to extract every piece of information
they currently do", but more of a "these
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 13:02, Paul Goyette wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020, Roy Marples wrote:
>
> >> "struct ifnet" is private to the kernel. This application should be using
> >> the properly exported data that's available via ioctls for this purpose.
> >
> > We have far too many kernel only
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020, Roy Marples wrote:
"struct ifnet" is private to the kernel. This application should be using
the properly exported data that's available via ioctls for this purpose.
We have far too many kernel only things exposed to userland.
Totally agree.
A constant beef of mine is
On 09/02/2020 01:52, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Feb 8, 2020, at 4:04 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
The package no longer builds. Fails with (among others)
error: 'struct ifnet' has no member named 'if_ibytes'; did you mean 'if_index'?
"struct ifnet" is private to the kernel. This application
> On Feb 8, 2020, at 4:04 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
>
> The package no longer builds. Fails with (among others)
>
> error: 'struct ifnet' has no member named 'if_ibytes'; did you mean
> 'if_index'?
"struct ifnet" is private to the kernel. This application should be using the
properly
The package no longer builds. Fails with (among others)
error: 'struct ifnet' has no member named 'if_ibytes'; did you mean
'if_index'?
++--+---+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
|
