Thanks :-)
Am 29.11.21 um 21:03 schrieb Jaromír Doleček:
UFS_ACL enabled in XEN3_DOMU now.
Le lun. 29 nov. 2021 à 17:46, Matthias Petermann a écrit
:
Am 28.11.21 um 17:32 schrieb Christos Zoulas:
Thanks for the bug report :-)
christos
You're welcome :-)
One more small question:
UFS_ACL enabled in XEN3_DOMU now.
Le lun. 29 nov. 2021 à 17:46, Matthias Petermann a écrit
:
>
> Am 28.11.21 um 17:32 schrieb Christos Zoulas:
> > Thanks for the bug report :-)
> >
> > christos
> >
>
> You're welcome :-)
>
> One more small question: currently the UFS_ACL option in the XEN3_DOMU
Am 28.11.21 um 17:32 schrieb Christos Zoulas:
Thanks for the bug report :-)
christos
You're welcome :-)
One more small question: currently the UFS_ACL option in the XEN3_DOMU
is not enabled by default for the amd64 architecture. For XEN_DOM0 the
option is enabled. I guess that the main
Hello all,
it turned out that my problem was a result of an inconsistency in the
ACL variant (NFSv4 vs. POSIX1e) that existed in NetBSD-current for about
2 months. Christos was kind enough to look at it and fix it right
away[1]. My big thanks for that!
With all NetBSD-current builds with
On 25.11.21 14:49, Matthias Petermann wrote:
I am using Samba 4.13.11 from pkgsrc-2021Q3 (compiled with acl-Option).
The NetBSD version is: NetBSD net.local 9.99.92 NetBSD 9.99.92
(XEN3_DOMU_CUSTOM) #0: Thu Nov 25 06:26:36 CET 2021
Hello all,
has anyone tried provisioning a Samba DC on NetBSD current recently?
I managed to do this about half a year ago. Currently, however, there
seems to be a problem that I can't quite figure out yet.
I use as storage for Samba / Sysvol a FFS with Posix ACLs enabled. I
have enabled
