FW: forgot to include current-users
-- Forwarded message -
From: Andrius V
Date: Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: Unfinished unichrome driver
To: Paul Goyette
Regarding removal, I believed that it should be removed because there
were no references to them
BTW, we should _not_ remove things from the ALL configs. The ALL is
supposed to contain "just about everything". ALL is _never_ guaranteed
to work, or even reliably build! :)
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, m...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:18:09PM +0300, Andrius V wrote:
Hi,
Since
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:18:09PM +0300, Andrius V wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since my VIA based hardware wasn't attaching a unichrome driver, I decided
> to take a look at it. After investigation, I found out that the driver had
> been mainly unfinished:
> * It matches only one unichrome graphics ID from
Hi,
Since my VIA based hardware wasn't attaching a unichrome driver, I decided
to take a look at it. After investigation, I found out that the driver had
been mainly unfinished:
* It matches only one unichrome graphics ID from (CN700 and related
chipsets) and have some hard coded values
