On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 02:29:01 -0400, William D. Jones thor0...@comcast.net
wrote:
For the time being, does anyone know offhand the date of the most
recent CVS commit in current that successfully compiles and does NOT
have this problem?
I have a machine on which I've routinely updated -current
On Sat 25 Oct 2014 at 06:30:24 -0400, William D. Jones wrote:
Oops, I should've just tested this- it appears that [ is a built-in on my
current machines. I misunderstood and thought that the [ command wasn't
included at all in the source tree due to a recent commit error (implying
that all
On 10/23/14 6:05 AM, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014, Markus Kilbinger wrote:
While looking for old / outdated binaries in userland I noticed that
'./bin/[' is no longer updated / part of base.tgz (or any other
*.tgz file) in HEAD and netbsd-7,
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014, Markus Kilbinger wrote:
While looking for old / outdated binaries in userland I noticed that
'./bin/[' is no longer updated / part of base.tgz (or any other *.tgz
file) in HEAD and netbsd-7, though it still seems to be listed in
'src/distrib/sets/lists/base/mi'.
I can
Hi!
While looking for old / outdated binaries in userland I noticed that
'./bin/[' is no longer updated / part of base.tgz (or any other *.tgz
file) in HEAD and netbsd-7, though it still seems to be listed in
'src/distrib/sets/lists/base/mi'.
Is this a known bug?
Otherwise I can send-pr ...
