On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 11:33:54AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:49:12AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Should we back out ad's changes until he has time to look at them?
>
> I just did that on behalf of core.
> Can you test if this solves your problem?
Thank you,
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 10:33, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:49:12AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Should we back out ad's changes until he has time to look at them?
>
> I just did that on behalf of core.
> Can you test if this solves your problem?
I rebuilt the system
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:49:12AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Should we back out ad's changes until he has time to look at them?
I just did that on behalf of core.
Can you test if this solves your problem?
Martin
Should we back out ad's changes until he has time to look at them?
Thomas
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:36:01AM +, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> This weird hang still takes place on
>
> ❯ uname -a
> NetBSD ymir.lorien.lan 10.99.10 NetBSD 10.99.10 (GENERIC) #13: Mon Oct
> 30 19:45:39 GMT 2023
>
This weird hang still takes place on
❯ uname -a
NetBSD ymir.lorien.lan 10.99.10 NetBSD 10.99.10 (GENERIC) #13: Mon Oct
30 19:45:39 GMT 2023
sysbu...@ymir.lorien.lan:/dumps/sysbuild/amd64/obj/home/sysbuild/src/sys/arch/amd64/com
pile/GENERIC amd64
- again during building a haskell package:
===>
... and probably
3. PR kern/57660
https://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=57660
Markus
Am So., 22. Okt. 2023 um 23:10 Uhr schrieb Thomas Klausner :
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 11:06:25PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:37:54PM +0200, Thomas
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 11:06:25PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:37:54PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > I've just updated my kernel from 10.99.10 to 10.99.10 (~ Oct 11 to Oct
> > 20) to test the rge(4) changes, and started a bulk build, and the
> > packages using
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 10:37:54PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> I've just updated my kernel from 10.99.10 to 10.99.10 (~ Oct 11 to Oct
> 20) to test the rge(4) changes, and started a bulk build, and the
> packages using ghc seem to wait for something and make no progress.
...
> I see one other
Hi!
I've just updated my kernel from 10.99.10 to 10.99.10 (~ Oct 11 to Oct
20) to test the rge(4) changes, and started a bulk build, and the
packages using ghc seem to wait for something and make no progress.
In one of my sandboxes there is a hs-data-array-byte build but it's not
doing anything.
