daily CVS update output

2019-06-10 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi P src/sys/arch/aarch64/aarch64/fault.c P src/sys/dev/audio/audio.c P src/sys/dev/audio/audiodef.h P src/sys/dev/audio/audiovar.h P src/tests/lib/libc/sys/t_ptrace_wait.c Updating xsrc tree: Killing core files: Updating file list:

Re: iwm driver leads to kernel crash

2019-06-10 Thread ng0
Martin Husemann transcribed 430 bytes: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 04:18:20PM +, n...@n0.is wrote: > > It's an T440s, so one module can be exchanged, the other is soldered > > to the board. > > > > I can give exchanging the replacable one a try. > > I have had good experience with running

Re: equivalent flag or code to MSG_MORE in NetBSD?

2019-06-10 Thread Erik Fair
There is an ancient BSD ioctl(2) which might cover this case: FIONREAD. The point of it back in the day was to be able to know just how much data could be read from a file descriptor (e.g., from TTY input buffers) without blocking. Erik Fair

Re: What to do with base X11 for netbsd-9 ?

2019-06-10 Thread Michael van Elst
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: > It doesn't seem to help. Another difference is that consdev com0 works > for the biosboot, but not for efiboot, which means I can't be sure > where nouveau gets stuck. Maybe EFI doesn't initialize com0. With e.g. consdev

Re: What to do with base X11 for netbsd-9 ?

2019-06-10 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 09:55:08AM -, Michael van Elst wrote: > pr...@cam.ac.uk (Patrick Welche) writes: > > >This has changed! The above is still true with EFI, but with BIOS booting, > >nouveau attaches successfully, and I can run xdm+twm! > > What happens in EFI mode when, before booting

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build success

2019-06-10 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again. The following commits were made between the last failed build and the successful build: 2019.06.10.10.28.41 mrg src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi,v 1.2277 Log files can be found at:

Re: 8.99.41 panic in nvm_poll

2019-06-10 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 05:38:56PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote: > On 2019/06/10 17:17, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > I tried some more stuff. > > > > Enabling the NVME_QUIRK_DELAY_B4_CHK_RDY quirk didn't help, it paniced > > during boot. However, forcing nvme_pci_force_intx to 1 makes it boot > >

Re: 8.99.41 panic in nvm_poll

2019-06-10 Thread Thomas Klausner
I tried some more stuff. Enabling the NVME_QUIRK_DELAY_B4_CHK_RDY quirk didn't help, it paniced during boot. However, forcing nvme_pci_force_intx to 1 makes it boot successfully! Should this variable default to 1, or how do we improve the situation in general? Cheers, Thomas

Re: 8.99.41 panic in nvm_poll

2019-06-10 Thread Masanobu SAITOH
On 2019/06/10 17:17, Thomas Klausner wrote: > I tried some more stuff. > > Enabling the NVME_QUIRK_DELAY_B4_CHK_RDY quirk didn't help, it paniced > during boot. However, forcing nvme_pci_force_intx to 1 makes it boot > successfully! Please show the following information: - "FULL" dmesg