Re: /etc/protocols generation

2022-11-28 Thread Christos Zoulas
Sounds good to me, perhaps something like src/etc/refresh-data/ with some structure under there? christos > On Nov 28, 2022, at 2:46 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > > Hello, > > I just spent some time shaving the /etc/protocols > generation yak. As best as I can tell the process how > that file

/etc/protocols generation

2022-11-28 Thread Jan Schaumann
Hello, I just spent some time shaving the /etc/protocols generation yak. As best as I can tell the process how that file is maintained is not documented and consists of: 1) building the pkgsrc/net/iana-etc package This package pulls a few scripts from http://sethwklein.net/iana-etc, which

daily CVS update output

2022-11-28 Thread NetBSD source update
Updating src tree: P src/doc/CHANGES P src/etc/protocols P src/sys/ufs/files.ufs P src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_extattr.c P src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_extern.h P src/tests/lib/libc/net/t_protoent.sh Updating xsrc tree: Killing core files: Updating file list: -rw-rw-r-- 1 srcmastr netbsd 42786706 Nov

Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

2022-11-28 Thread NetBSD Test Fixture
This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the NetBSD test suite. The newly failing test case is: lib/libc/net/t_protoent:protoent The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in at least 26 consecutive runs before that. The following commits were

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure

2022-11-28 Thread Jan Schaumann
NetBSD Test Fixture wrote: > This is an automatically generated notice of a new failure of the > NetBSD test suite. > > The newly failing test case is: > > lib/libc/net/t_protoent:protoent > > The above test failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in > at least 26 consecutive