This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the
NetBSD test suite.
The newly failing test cases are:
fs/vfs/t_full:ext2fs_fillfs
fs/vfs/t_io:ext2fs_extendfile
fs/vfs/t_io:ext2fs_extendfile_append
fs/vfs/t_io:ext2fs_holywrite
fs/vfs/t_io:ext2fs_overwrite512
Updating src tree:
P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/man/mi
P src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi
P src/doc/3RDPARTY
P src/etc/Makefile
P src/etc/mtree/NetBSD.dist.base
P src/etc/mtree/NetBSD.dist.tests
P src/external/mpl/Makefile
U src/external/mpl/mozilla-certdata/Makefile
The NetBSD-current/i386 build is working again.
The following commits were made between the last failed build and the
first successful build:
2023.08.26.05.18.17 riastradh src/sys/ufs/ext2fs/ext2fs.h 1.50
2023.08.26.05.22.50 riastradh src/sys/ufs/ext2fs/ext2fs.h 1.51
Hi!
I have a Laminar CI server running, queueing all cpu/port
configurations every now and then. Should I also drop an email to this
list for new-success, new-failure or any build?
Thanks,
Jan-Benedict
--
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nia writes:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 08:55:13PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
>> Picking up on this, particularly with netbsd-10 looming, I think we
>> should at least whitelist some known good-with-modesetting Intel GPUs,
>> with a plan to swapping over to whitelisting keep-on-intel Intel over
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 06:47:01AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I am new to modern intel graphics. I have a UHD 630 with a 9th
> generation (coffee lake?) CPU. It is using intel, and it works for
> xterm :-) But I see artifacts while typing into github comment boxes.
> Is this something I should
